AMD Radeon 680M vs Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The AMD Radeon 680M and Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 occupy different positions in the database, and the recorded measurements reflect that divergence clearly. The Radeon 680M has three benchmark entries, while the LX 7G100 currently has no recorded benchmark scores. This absence of data for the Lisuan Tech part makes direct numerical comparison impossible, but the available specifications and the Radeon 680M's placement among rivals provide a framework for analysis.

The Radeon 680M delivers a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 378. Its Geekbench OpenCL score reaches 23,468, and its Geekbench Vulkan score lands at 21,965. These three results combine into an average benchmark score of 15,270, which places the integrated GPU at the 57th percentile among all GPUs in the database. The LX 7G100, by contrast, has an average benchmark score of 0 and sits at the 50th percentile purely as a placeholder, since percentile calculations require actual test data.

When the Radeon 680M is positioned against its nearest rivals, the margins are exceptionally tight. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 averages 15,283, which is 0.1% ahead of the AMD part. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 averages 15,290, also 0.1% ahead. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM averages 15,199, putting the Radeon 680M 0.5% ahead of that card. The AMD Radeon RX 7600 averages 15,171, with the Radeon 680M leading by 0.7%. These delta values indicate that the integrated Radeon 680M performs within a narrow band around these discrete graphics cards, a notable result for an IGP.

The LX 7G100 has no rivals listed and no benchmark scores, so the database offers no measured performance comparisons for it. The specifications, however, suggest a fundamentally different performance class. The LX 7G100 lists 6,144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 96 ROPs. The Radeon 680M lists 768 shading units, 48 TMUs, and 32 ROPs. The Lisuan Tech part also carries 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth, while the Radeon 680M uses system shared memory with bandwidth described as system dependent.

The FP32 compute figures reinforce the gap. The LX 7G100 delivers 24.58 TFLOPS, and the Radeon 680M delivers 3.379 TFLOPS. That is a substantial theoretical compute difference, though without benchmark results for the LX 7G100, the database cannot confirm how that theoretical output translates into real-world test scores.

Where Each One Wins

The Radeon 680M wins in the category of measured, verified performance data. It has three benchmark scores recorded, an average score of 15,270, and a percentile ranking of 57. The LX 7G100 has zero recorded benchmark scores, an average score of 0, and no nearest rivals. Any discussion of where the LX 7G100 wins must rely on its listed specifications rather than test results.

In raw compute throughput, the LX 7G100 wins decisively on paper. Its FP32 output of 24.58 TFLOPS is roughly 7.3 times the Radeon 680M's 3.379 TFLOPS. The texture rate tells a similar story: 384.0 GTexel/s for the LX 7G100 versus 105.6 GTexel/s for the Radeon 680M. The pixel rate follows the pattern: 192.0 GPixel/s versus 70.40 GPixel/s. These are large margins in theoretical peak rates.

Memory capacity and bandwidth also favor the LX 7G100. The 12 GB GDDR6 frame buffer with a 192-bit interface and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth stands apart from the Radeon 680M's system shared memory configuration. The Radeon 680M's memory bandwidth is listed as system dependent, which means it varies with the host platform's memory subsystem. The LX 7G100's dedicated memory provides a fixed, specification-level bandwidth that does not depend on external factors.

In terms of API support, both parts list DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The Radeon 680M lists Vulkan 1.4, while the LX 7G100 lists Vulkan 1.3. The Radeon 680M also includes 12 ray tracing cores, while the LX 7G100 lists no ray tracing core count. The AMD part's RDNA 2.0 architecture incorporates hardware ray tracing support, while the Lisuan Tech's TrueGPU architecture does not list any ray tracing hardware in the database.

The Radeon 680M wins on power efficiency by specification. Its TDP is 50 W, and it uses no power connectors as an IGP. The LX 7G100 has a 225 W TDP, requires a single 8-pin power connector, and carries a suggested PSU of 550 W. The Radeon 680M's slot width is listed as IGP, while the LX 7G100 is dual-slot with a length of 294 mm, height of 120 mm, and width of 49 mm.

Physical footprint favors the Radeon 680M for compact systems, as it integrates directly into a processor package. The LX 7G100 is a standalone dual-slot expansion card with four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs. The Radeon 680M's display outputs are described as portable device dependent, meaning they vary by the host device.

The Verdict

The data supports a clear split based on what each product is designed to do. The AMD Radeon 680M is an integrated GPU built for Rembrandt Mobile platforms. Its 50 W TDP, system shared memory, and IGP slot width indicate it belongs in laptops and compact portable devices. Its measured benchmark scores place it at the 57th percentile, within 0.7% of the AMD Radeon RX 7600 and within 0.1% of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060. For an integrated solution, that is a strong measured position.

The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 is a discrete, dual-slot graphics card with dedicated GDDR6 memory, a 225 W TDP, and a 550 W suggested PSU. Its specification sheet describes a high-throughput part with 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 compute, 384.0 GTexel/s texture rate, and 432.0 GB/s memory bandwidth. But the database contains no benchmark scores for this product, so its real-world performance cannot be validated against the Radeon 680M or any other GPU.

Who should pick which depends entirely on the use case. For a portable device or an integrated system where power draw and physical space are constrained, the Radeon 680M is the only option that fits, and its measured scores show it competes with older discrete cards like the GTX 580 and RTX 2060 within a fraction of a percent. For a desktop system with a 550 W power supply and room for a 294 mm dual-slot card, the LX 7G100 offers far higher theoretical compute, but the absence of recorded benchmarks means the database cannot confirm whether that theoretical advantage materializes in actual tests.

The production status of both parts is listed as active. The Radeon 680M was released on January 2, 2023, while the LX 7G100 has a release date of June 17, 2026. The Radeon 680M has a predecessor listed as Vega II IGP and a successor listed as Navi III IGP. The LX 7G100 has no predecessor or successor listed.

FAQ

Q: How does the AMD Radeon 680M compare to its nearest rivals in the database?

A: The Radeon 680M averages 15,270 across its three benchmark scores. It sits 0.1% behind the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 (15,283) and 0.1% behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (15,290). It sits 0.5% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM (15,199) and 0.7% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 7600 (15,171).

Q: What benchmark scores does the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 have?

A: The database lists no benchmark scores for the LX 7G100. Its average benchmark score is 0, and it has no nearest rivals recorded.

Q: What memory configuration does each GPU use?

A: The Radeon 680M uses system shared memory with a system dependent bandwidth. The LX 7G100 uses 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth and a memory clock of 2250 MHz, which is 18 Gbps effective.

Q: What are the power requirements for each GPU?

A: The Radeon 680M has a TDP of 50 W and uses no power connectors. The LX 7G100 has a TDP of 225 W, requires one 8-pin power connector, and has a suggested PSU of 550 W.

Q: Which GPU has higher theoretical compute performance?

A: The LX 7G100 lists FP32 performance of 24.58 TFLOPS, while the Radeon 680M lists 3.379 TFLOPS. The LX 7G100 also lists 6,144 shading units versus 768 for the Radeon 680M.

Q: Do both GPUs support ray tracing?

A: The Radeon 680M lists 12 ray tracing cores as part of its RDNA 2.0 architecture. The LX 7G100 does not list any ray tracing core count in the database.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from different architectural lineages. The AMD Radeon 680M uses the RDNA 2.0 architecture with a chip called Rembrandt+, belonging to the Navi II IGP generation for Rembrandt Mobile platforms. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 uses a TrueGPU architecture with a chip called 7G106, belonging to the 7G100 generation. Both are fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC, but the similarities largely end there.

The Radeon 680M integrates 13,100 million transistors on a 208 mm² die, resulting in a transistor density of 63.0M per mm². The LX 7G100's transistor count and die size are listed as unknown in the database, so no density figure can be calculated. The Radeon 680M's base clock is 2000 MHz with a boost clock of 2200 MHz. The LX 7G100 has no base or boost clock listed, only a memory clock of 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective data rate.

Compute resources differ sharply. The Radeon 680M has 768 shading units, 48 TMUs, 32 ROPs, and 12 ray tracing cores. The LX 7G100 has 6,144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs, with no ray tracing cores listed. The Radeon 680M's pixel rate is 70.40 GPixel/s and its texture rate is 105.6 GTexel/s. The LX 7G100's pixel rate is 192.0 GPixel/s and its texture rate is 384.0 GTexel/s. FP16 performance for the Radeon 680M is 6.758 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio, while the LX 7G100 lists 49.15 TFLOPS with the same 2:1 ratio.

Memory architecture represents a fundamental design difference. The Radeon 680M shares system memory with the host processor, with no dedicated frame buffer, no bus width specification, and bandwidth dependent on the system. The LX 7G100 uses dedicated GDDR6 memory with a fixed 192-bit bus and a fixed 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. This dedicated memory configuration is typical of discrete graphics cards, while the Radeon 680M's system shared design is typical of integrated GPUs.

The bus interface also differs. The Radeon 680M connects via PCIe 4.0 x8, while the LX 7G100 uses PCIe 4.0 x16. The wider interface on the LX 7G100 provides additional bandwidth for data transfers between the card and the host system, though the database notes that the Radeon 680M's memory bandwidth is system dependent.

Physical design separates the two products completely. The Radeon 680M is an IGP with no slot width, no power connectors, and display outputs described as portable device dependent. The LX 7G100 is a dual-slot card measuring 294 mm in length, 120 mm in height, and 49 mm in width, with four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs, one 8-pin power connector, and a suggested PSU of 550 W.

API support shows minor differences. Both list DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The Radeon 680M lists Vulkan 1.4, while the LX 7G100 lists Vulkan 1.3. The Radeon 680M's ray tracing cores give it hardware support for ray-traced workloads under DirectX 12 Ultimate, while the LX 7G100's TrueGPU architecture does not list any ray tracing hardware.

The Radeon 680M has a documented lineage: its predecessor is Vega II IGP and its successor is Navi III IGP. The LX 7G100 has no predecessor or successor recorded. The Radeon 680M's release date is January 2, 2023, and the LX 7G100's release date is June 17, 2026. Both parts are listed as active in production.

The database records the Radeon 680M at the 57th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 15,270. The LX 7G100 sits at the 50th percentile with an average score of 0, reflecting the lack of measured data. These percentile values should be read with that caveat: the Radeon 680M's ranking comes from actual test runs, while the LX 7G100's ranking is a default position pending benchmark submissions.