GPU Comparison

AMD
RADEON

AMD Radeon 680M

CORE STATE Rembrandt+
VRAM System Shared
CLOCK SPEED 2200 MHz
TDP 50 W
BUS WIDTH System Shared
ARCHITECTURE RDNA 2.0
nm
PROCESS 6 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2023
VS
AMD
RADEON

Radeon 890M

CORE STATE Strix Point
VRAM System Shared
CLOCK SPEED 2900 MHz
TDP 15 W
BUS WIDTH System Shared
ARCHITECTURE RDNA 3.5
nm
PROCESS 4 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
378
590
geekbench_opencl
23,468
37,254
geekbench_vulkan
21,965
40,808
passmark_directx_10
N/A
33
passmark_directx_11
N/A
73
passmark_directx_12
N/A
37
passmark_directx_9
N/A
97
passmark_g2d
N/A
979
passmark_g3d
N/A
8,076
passmark_gpu_compute
N/A
4,157

Analysis: AMD Radeon 680M vs AMD Radeon 890M

Visual performance benchmarks between AMD AMD Radeon 890M graphics card and AMD AMD Radeon 680M GPU reveal a obvious champion. AMD AMD Radeon 890M graphics card delivers substantially stronger FPS throughout contemporary titles. This VRAM edge and architectural improvements lead into visibly smoother rendering performance. Performance data supports this finding. Enthusiasts wanting top-tier performance will take note.

This graphics memory benefit of AMD AMD Radeon 890M graphics card becomes increasingly significant at elevated detail settings. High resolution rendering requires notable VRAM, and AMD AMD Radeon 890M graphics card provides extra buffer. The results into better gameplay in memory-intensive scenarios. Upcoming games can only demand additional VRAM. This edge widens over releases.

All things considered, AMD AMD Radeon 890M graphics card provides the superior choice in this matchup. The performance edges support attention for those constructing a demanding visual PC. Although AMD AMD Radeon 680M GPU possesses its positives, the performance results obviously favors AMD AMD Radeon 890M graphics card. Base your choice accordingly. This gaming difference is notable enough to influence.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
680M
890M
Core Specs
Shading Units
768
1,024 +33.3%
Shaders
768
1,024 +33.3%
TMUs
48
64 +33.3%
ROPs
32
32 0.0%
Compute Units
12
16 +33.3%
Clocks
Base Clock
2000 MHz
400 MHz
Boost Clock
2200 MHz
2900 MHz
Memory Clock
System Shared
System Shared
Memory
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Shared
Bandwidth
System Dependent
System Dependent
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
128 KB per Array
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB
L0 Cache
32 KB per WGP
32 KB per WGP
Performance
Pixel Rate
70.40 GPixel/s
92.80 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
105.6 GTexel/s
185.6 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
3.379 TFLOPS
5.939 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
211.2 GFLOPS (1:16)
371.2 GFLOPS (1:16)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
6.758 TFLOPS (2:1)
5.939 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
12
16 +33.3%
Power
TDP
50 W
15 W
TDP (W)
50
15 -70.0%
Power Connectors
None
None
Architecture
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
RDNA 3.5
GPU Name
Rembrandt+
Strix Point
Generation
Navi II IGP (Rembrandt Mobile)
Navi III IGP (Strix Point Mobile)
Process Size
6 nm
4 nm
Transistors
13,100 million
34,000 million
Die Size
208 mm²
233 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
TSMC
Density
63.0M / mm²
145.9M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
2.0
2.1
Shader Model
6.8
6.8
Physical
Slot Width
IGP
IGP
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
Portable Device Dependent
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
PCIe 4.0 x8
Other
Production
Active
Active
Predecessor
Vega II IGP
Navi II IGP
Successor
Navi III IGP
View Radeon 680M Details View Radeon 890M Details