AMD Instinct MI350P vs Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows no benchmark entries for either the AMD Instinct MI350P or the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100. Both cards sit at the 50th percentile among all GPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of zero. This means no direct performance measurements exist to compare frame rates, compute throughput, or synthetic scores. The absence of data is itself informative: neither card has been validated through the database's testing pipeline, and any performance conclusions must be drawn from architectural specifications rather than measured results.

Without benchmark runs, the closest comparison available is theoretical peak throughput. The AMD Instinct MI350P delivers 36.04 TFLOPS FP32 and 36.04 TFLOPS FP16, with a 1:1 ratio between the two precisions. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 delivers 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 and 49.15 TFLOPS FP16, with a 2:1 ratio. In single-precision work, the AMD part leads by 11.46 TFLOPS, roughly 47% higher. In half-precision workloads, the Lisuan part leads by 13.11 TFLOPS, roughly 36% higher. These figures indicate a fundamental split: the Instinct MI350P favors FP32 compute, while the LX 7G100 doubles its FP16 throughput at the expense of FP32 rate.

Memory bandwidth presents a similar divergence. The Instinct MI350P reaches 8.19 TB/s through an 8192-bit HBM3e interface, while the LX 7G100 reaches 432.0 GB/s through a 192-bit GDDR6 interface. The AMD card's bandwidth advantage is roughly 19x, which matters for memory-bound workloads. The Lisuan card counters with a much smaller memory footprint of 12 GB versus 144 GB, and a lower effective memory clock of 18 Gbps versus 8 Gbps. The effective clock difference does not offset the bus width disparity.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Instinct MI350P uses the CDNA 4.0 architecture on a 3 nm TSMC process, built around the MI350 128CU chip. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 uses the TrueGPU architecture on a 6 nm TSMC process, built around the 7G106 chip. Both come from TSMC foundries, but the node difference is substantial: 3 nm versus 6 nm. The AMD part packs 73,000 million transistors onto a 1190 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 61.3M per square millimeter. The Lisuan part's transistor count and die size are unknown in the database, so density cannot be calculated.

The Instinct MI350P contains 8192 shading units, 512 texture mapping units, and no ROPs, delivering a texture rate of 1,126.4 GTexel/s and a pixel rate of 0 MPixel/s. The LX 7G100 contains 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs, delivering a texture rate of 384.0 GTexel/s and a pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s. The AMD card has 2048 more shading units and 320 more TMUs, but it lacks ROPs entirely, which is consistent with a compute-oriented accelerator that does not drive display outputs. The Lisuan card includes 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.3. The Instinct MI350P has no display outputs and no API support listed for DirectX, OpenGL, or Vulkan.

Clock behavior differs as well. The Instinct MI350P runs at 1000 MHz base and 2200 MHz boost, with memory at 2000 MHz (8 Gbps effective). The LX 7G100 has no base or boost clock recorded, but its memory runs at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). The AMD card's boost clock is 2.2x its base clock, while the Lisuan card's core clocks are simply not documented. Power delivery also diverges: the Instinct MI350P draws 600 W TDP with a 1x 16-pin connector and a suggested 1000 W PSU, while the LX 7G100 draws 225 W TDP with a 1x 8-pin connector and a suggested 550 W PSU.

FAQ

Q: Which card has higher FP32 throughput?

A: The AMD Instinct MI350P delivers 36.04 TFLOPS FP32, which is 11.46 TFLOPS higher than the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100's 24.58 TFLOPS.

Q: Which card has higher FP16 throughput?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 delivers 49.15 TFLOPS FP16, which is 13.11 TFLOPS higher than the AMD Instinct MI350P's 36.04 TFLOPS.

Q: How do memory capacities and bandwidths compare?

A: The AMD Instinct MI350P has 144 GB of HBM3e with 8.19 TB/s bandwidth. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has 12 GB of GDDR6 with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. The AMD card offers 132 GB more capacity and roughly 19x more bandwidth.

Q: Can either card output video?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs. The AMD Instinct MI350P has no display outputs.

Q: What are the power requirements?

A: The AMD Instinct MI350P has a 600 W TDP and requires a 1000 W suggested PSU with a 1x 16-pin connector. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has a 225 W TDP and requires a 550 W suggested PSU with a 1x 8-pin connector.

Q: What process nodes do the two cards use?

A: The AMD Instinct MI350P uses a 3 nm TSMC process. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 uses a 6 nm TSMC process.

Specification Differences

| Field | AMD Instinct MI350P | Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 |

|---|---|---|

| Architecture | CDNA 4.0 | TrueGPU |

| Process node | 3 nm | 6 nm |

| Transistors | 73,000 million | unknown |

| Die size | 1190 mm² | unknown |

| Transistor density | 61.3M / mm² | null |

| Base clock | 1000 MHz | null |

| Boost clock | 2200 MHz | null |

| Memory clock | 2000 MHz 8 Gbps effective | 2250 MHz 18 Gbps effective |

| Memory size | 144 GB | 12 GB |

| Memory type | HBM3e | GDDR6 |

| Memory bus width | 8192 bit | 192 bit |

| Memory bandwidth | 8.19 TB/s | 432.0 GB/s |

| Shading units | 8192 | 6144 |

| TMUs | 512 | 192 |

| ROPs | 0 | 96 |

| Pixel rate | 0 MPixel/s | 192.0 GPixel/s |

| Texture rate | 1,126.4 GTexel/s | 384.0 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 36.04 TFLOPS | 24.58 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 36.04 TFLOPS (1:1) | 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| TDP | 600 W | 225 W |

| Power connectors | 1x 16-pin | 1x 8-pin |

| Suggested PSU | 1000 W | 550 W |

| Bus interface | PCIe 5.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |

| Display outputs | No outputs | 4x DisplayPort 1.4a |

| DirectX | N/A | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |

| OpenGL | N/A | 4.6 |

| Vulkan | N/A | 1.3 |

| Length | 267 mm 10.5 inches | 294 mm 11.6 inches |

| Height | 111 mm 4.4 inches | 120 mm 4.7 inches |

| Width | 40 mm 1.6 inches | 49 mm 1.9 inches |

| Release date | 2026-05-06 | 2026-06-17 |

| Production status | null | Active |

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Instinct MI350P wins in raw compute density and memory capacity. Its 36.04 TFLOPS FP32 output exceeds the LX 7G100 by 47%, and its 144 GB HBM3e pool with 8.19 TB/s bandwidth dwarfs the 12 GB GDDR6 configuration. The 8192-bit bus width and 512 TMUs support high-throughput texture and matrix operations. The card runs on PCIe 5.0 x16, doubling the connection bandwidth of the LX 7G100's PCIe 4.0 x16. Its 73,000 million transistors on a 3 nm node indicate a much larger and more complex silicon design. The absence of ROPs and display outputs confirms this is a dedicated accelerator, not a graphics card.

The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 wins in FP16 throughput, rasterization, and power efficiency. Its 49.15 TFLOPS FP16 exceeds the AMD card by 36%, and its 2:1 FP16 ratio means it processes half-precision data faster than single-precision. The 96 ROPs and 192.0 GPixel/s pixel rate are features the Instinct MI350P lacks entirely. The 12 GB GDDR6 memory operates at 18 Gbps effective, more than double the effective clock of the AMD card's HBM3e. The 225 W TDP with a 550 W PSU requirement makes it far less demanding than the 600 W TDP and 1000 W PSU requirement of the AMD card. It also includes 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs and full DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.3 support, which the AMD card does not provide. The LX 7G100 is listed as Active in production status, while the Instinct MI350P has no production status recorded.

The Verdict

The database records no benchmark scores for either card, so the verdict rests on architectural data. The AMD Instinct MI350P is the choice for compute-heavy FP32 workloads and massive memory residency. Its 36.04 TFLOPS FP32, 144 GB HBM3e, and 8.19 TB/s bandwidth suit training and inference tasks where model weights exceed 12 GB. The 8192-bit bus and 1,126.4 GTexel/s texture rate indicate a device built for sustained throughput rather than interactive graphics. The 600 W TDP and 1000 W PSU requirement reflect the cost of that capability.

The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 is the choice for FP16 workloads, display output, and lower power envelopes. Its 49.15 TFLOPS FP16, 192.0 GPixel/s pixel rate, and 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs make it a dual-purpose card that can handle graphics and half-precision compute. The 225 W TDP and 550 W PSU requirement fit systems without high-end power delivery. The DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.3 support mean it can run graphics applications, while the AMD card cannot.

The 3 nm process node of the Instinct MI350P versus 6 nm for the LX 7G100 explains part of the performance gap, but the transistor count of the Lisuan card is unknown, so efficiency comparisons are incomplete. The release dates fall within weeks of each other: May 6, 2026 for the AMD card and June 17, 2026 for the Lisuan card. Both are dual-slot designs, but the LX 7G100 is longer, taller, and wider at 294 mm, 120 mm, and 49 mm versus 267 mm, 111 mm, and 40 mm for the Instinct MI350P. Users needing pure FP32 compute and large memory should select the AMD Instinct MI350P. Users needing FP16 speed, graphics outputs, and lower system demands should select the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100.