AMD Instinct MI350P vs Intel Arc Graphics 24EU Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark results between the AMD Instinct MI350P and the Intel Arc Graphics 24EU. The two products occupy entirely different segments, with the MI350P being a dedicated accelerator and the Arc Graphics 24EU being an integrated graphics processor. The AMD Instinct MI350P has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, while the Intel Arc Graphics 24EU has a single entry: a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 733.

The Intel Arc Graphics 24EU sits in the 3rd percentile of all GPUs in the database, indicating that it performs below the vast majority of recorded graphics processors. Its average benchmark score of 733 places it in close proximity to several rivals. The Intel Arc Graphics 32EU records an identical average score of 733 with a 0% delta, and the Intel Arc Graphics 64EU also matches at 733 with a 0% delta. The AMD Radeon HD 6470M trails slightly with a score of 723, a 1.4% delta behind the Arc 24EU. The NVIDIA GeForce GT 415M leads this small group with a score of 751, representing a 2.4% advantage over the Arc 24EU.

The MI350P has no benchmark entries, no average score, and no nearest rivals listed in the database. Its percentile rank of 50 is a placeholder value rather than a measurement from recorded tests. Consequently, any direct performance comparison between these two products must rely on their architectural specifications rather than empirical benchmark data.

The Arc Graphics 24EU produces a texture rate of 24.00 GTexel/s and a pixel rate of 12.00 GPixel/s, while the MI350P achieves a texture rate of 1,126.4 GTexel/s and a pixel rate of 0 MPixel/s. The MI350P's FP32 throughput reaches 36.04 TFLOPS, compared to 768.0 GFLOPS for the Arc 24EU. These figures indicate a substantial performance gap, but the absence of shared benchmark tests prevents a direct numerical comparison.

FAQ

Q: What is the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score for the Intel Arc Graphics 24EU?

A: The Intel Arc Graphics 24EU records a score of 733 in the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test.

Q: How does the Intel Arc Graphics 24EU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Intel Arc Graphics 32EU and Intel Arc Graphics 64EU both score 733 with a 0% delta. The AMD Radeon HD 6470M scores 723, which is 1.4% lower. The NVIDIA GeForce GT 415M scores 751, which is 2.4% higher.

Q: Does the AMD Instinct MI350P have any benchmark scores in the database?

A: No, the AMD Instinct MI350P has an empty benchmark array and an average benchmark score of 0.

Q: What is the memory configuration of the AMD Instinct MI350P?

A: The MI350P features 144 GB of HBM3e memory with an 8192-bit bus width and a bandwidth of 8.19 TB/s.

Q: What memory does the Intel Arc Graphics 24EU use?

A: The Intel Arc Graphics 24EU uses System Shared memory, with system-dependent bandwidth and a system-shared bus width.

Q: What is the FP32 performance of each product?

A: The AMD Instinct MI350P delivers 36.04 TFLOPS, while the Intel Arc Graphics 24EU delivers 768.0 GFLOPS.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Instinct MI350P is built on the CDNA 4.0 architecture, a compute-oriented design specifically intended for accelerated workloads. The chip, designated MI350 128CU, uses a 3 nm process node from TSMC and contains 73,000 million transistors on a die size of 1190 mm², yielding a transistor density of 61.3 million transistors per square millimeter. The architecture belongs to the Instinct (MIx) generation, with its predecessor listed as Radeon Instinct.

The Intel Arc Graphics 24EU uses the Xe-LPG architecture, a graphics-focused design from the Arc Graphics (Arrow Lake) generation. The chip is labeled Arrow Lake-S and also uses a 3 nm process node from TSMC, but contains 17,800 million transistors on a die size of 243 mm², resulting in a transistor density of 73.3 million transistors per square millimeter. Its predecessor is listed as HD Graphics.

The MI350P has 8192 shading units, 512 texture mapping units, and no raster output pipelines, resulting in a pixel rate of 0 MPixel/s. The Arc 24EU has 192 shading units, 12 texture mapping units, and 6 raster output pipelines, producing a pixel rate of 12.00 GPixel/s. The MI350P's texture rate of 1,126.4 GTexel/s vastly exceeds the Arc 24EU's 24.00 GTexel/s.

The MI350P supports FP16 at a 1:1 ratio with FP32, both at 36.04 TFLOPS. The Arc 24EU supports FP16 at a 2:1 ratio, delivering 1.536 TFLOPS compared to its FP32 figure of 768.0 GFLOPS.

The MI350P has no display outputs, while the Arc 24EU's display outputs are motherboard dependent. The MI350P does not support DirectX, OpenGL, or Vulkan, whereas the Arc 24EU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Specification Differences

The AMD Instinct MI350P and Intel Arc Graphics 24EU differ across nearly every recorded specification. The MI350P uses a base clock of 1000 MHz and a boost clock of 2200 MHz with memory clocked at 2000 MHz (8 Gbps effective). The Arc 24EU uses a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 2000 MHz with no dedicated memory clock.

Memory configurations are fundamentally different. The MI350P has 144 GB of HBM3e memory on an 8192-bit bus with 8.19 TB/s bandwidth. The Arc 24EU relies on System Shared memory with system-dependent bandwidth.

The MI350P has a thermal design power of 600 W, a dual-slot form factor, and a 1x 16-pin power connector with a suggested PSU of 1000 W. The Arc 24EU has a TDP of 65 W, an IGP slot width, no power connectors, and no suggested PSU.

The MI350P uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 bus interface, while the Arc 24EU uses a Ring Bus interface. The MI350P measures 267 mm in length, 111 mm in height, and 40 mm in width. The Arc 24EU has no recorded dimensions.

The MI350P has no production status recorded and a release date of May 6, 2026. The Arc 24EU has a production status of Active and a release date of October 23, 2024.

The Verdict

The recorded data indicates that these two products serve entirely different purposes. The AMD Instinct MI350P is a dedicated accelerator with 144 GB of HBM3e memory, 8192 shading units, and 36.04 TFLOPS of FP32 performance. The Intel Arc Graphics 24EU is an integrated graphics processor with 192 shading units, system-shared memory, and 768.0 GFLOPS of FP32 performance.

The MI350P has no benchmark scores, no nearest rivals, and no percentile measurement in the database. The Arc 24EU has a measurable benchmark score of 733 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, placing it in the 3rd percentile of all GPUs. This percentile rank indicates that the Arc 24EU is among the lower-performing graphics processors in the database.

The MI350P's architecture, memory subsystem, and compute throughput are designed for workloads that do not involve graphics output. The Arc 24EU is designed for standard display output and supports modern graphics APIs including DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

The data supports the conclusion that the MI350P is intended for compute-intensive applications where raw FP32 and FP16 throughput matter, while the Arc 24EU is intended for basic graphics acceleration within a processor package. The MI350P's lack of display outputs and graphics API support confirms that it is not a consumer graphics solution.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Instinct MI350P wins in compute throughput. Its FP32 performance of 36.04 TFLOPS is 46.9 times higher than the Arc 24EU's 768.0 GFLOPS. Its texture rate of 1,126.4 GTexel/s is 46.9 times higher than the Arc 24EU's 24.00 GTexel/s. The MI350P's memory bandwidth of 8.19 TB/s is a figure the Arc 24EU cannot match with system-shared memory.

The Intel Arc Graphics 24EU wins in graphics output capability. It features 6 raster output pipelines with a pixel rate of 12.00 GPixel/s, while the MI350P has 0 raster output pipelines and a pixel rate of 0 MPixel/s. The Arc 24EU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, whereas the MI350P supports none of these APIs.

The Arc 24EU wins in power efficiency. Its TDP of 65 W is substantially lower than the MI350P's 600 W. The Arc 24EU also wins in physical integration, using an IGP slot width with no power connectors, while the MI350P requires a dual-slot form factor, a 1x 16-pin power connector, and a suggested PSU of 1000 W.

The MI350P wins in memory capacity and bandwidth, offering 144 GB of HBM3e with an 8192-bit bus. The Arc 24EU has no dedicated memory and depends entirely on system memory.

The Arc 24EU wins in the only recorded benchmark test. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 733 places it in the 3rd percentile, which is a measurable result. The MI350P has no recorded benchmark scores, so no comparable metric exists.

The MI350P wins in transistor count and die area, with 73,000 million transistors on a 1190 mm² die. The Arc 24EU uses 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die. The Arc 24EU achieves a higher transistor density at 73.3 million per mm² versus 61.3 million per mm² for the MI350P.