AMD Instinct MI300A vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Comparison

AMD Instinct MI300A and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 occupy opposite ends of the hardware spectrum, one a data-center accelerator with no display outputs and the other a mainstream consumer graphics card. The recorded benchmark data for the MI300A is empty, while the RTX 4060 carries a full suite of scores, making direct numerical comparison impossible. The analysis below focuses on what the database shows for each part, their architectural identities, and how the RTX 4060’s measured results position it against its nearest recorded rivals.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no head-to-head benchmark entries for the AMD Instinct MI300A versus the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060. The MI300A has zero recorded benchmark scores and no nearest rivals, while the RTX 4060 has ten individual benchmark results across multiple test suites. Without overlapping metrics, no direct performance delta can be stated. The RTX 4060’s average benchmark score is 17639, which places it at the 61st percentile of all GPUs in the database. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon HD 7790, scores 17666, a difference of -0.2%, meaning the RTX 4060 trails that card by a fraction of a percent. The AMD Radeon 780M scores 17588, putting the RTX 4060 ahead by 0.3%. The AMD Radeon Pro 560 scores 17551, with the RTX 4060 leading by 0.5%, and the AMD Radeon Pro 460 scores 17509, giving the RTX 4060 a 0.7% advantage. These deltas are tiny, indicating the RTX 4060 sits in a tightly clustered performance band among these recorded rivals.

Looking at the RTX 4060’s individual benchmark scores, the highest raw figure appears in Geekbench OpenCL at 95057, followed by Geekbench Vulkan at 48643. In Passmark tests, the G3D score is 19545, GPU Compute is 9213, G2D is 1037, DirectX 9 is 236, DirectX 11 is 175, DirectX 10 is 103, and DirectX 12 is 76. These numbers show a wide spread across different API workloads, with synthetic compute tests far exceeding legacy DirectX performance. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 2302, a modern test that reflects current-generation gaming workload demands. The MI300A, by contrast, has no such entries, so the database records no measurable wins for either side. The MI300A’s percentile rank is 50 with an average score of zero, which is a placeholder rather than a tested result.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 4060 wins in any scenario involving consumer-facing graphics workloads, as its benchmark results demonstrate. The Passmark DirectX 11 score of 175 and DirectX 12 score of 76 indicate functional support for modern gaming APIs, while the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 result of 2302 confirms it handles current-generation rasterization tests. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 95057 and Vulkan score of 48643 show strong compute and graphics throughput for client applications. Its 61st percentile rank among all GPUs places it above half the database entries, and its nearest rivals all sit within a 0.7% band, meaning it trades positions with older cards rather than dominating them. For users running DirectX 9 workloads, the Passmark score of 236 is the highest among its DirectX entries, suggesting legacy compatibility remains functional.

The MI300A wins in contexts where its hardware specifications matter more than benchmark scores, since no measured data exists. Its 128 GB of HBM3 memory with 5.32 TB/s bandwidth and 8192-bit bus width targets memory-bound data-center tasks, far beyond the RTX 4060’s 8 GB GDDR6 with 272.0 GB/s and 128-bit bus. The MI300A’s 61.29 TFLOPS FP32 throughput dwarfs the RTX 4060’s 15.11 TFLOPS, a 4-fold gap in raw floating-point capacity. The MI300A also has 14592 shading units versus 3072 on the RTX 4060, and 912 texture mapping units versus 96. These figures indicate the MI300A is built for massive parallel compute, while the RTX 4060 targets single-GPU desktop workloads. The MI300A has no display outputs, so it cannot drive a monitor, whereas the RTX 4060 provides 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a.

FAQ

Q: Does the AMD Instinct MI300A have any recorded benchmark scores?

A: No. The database lists zero benchmarks for the MI300A, with an average score of 0 and a percentile rank of 50. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 has ten recorded benchmark scores across 3DMark, Geekbench, and Passmark suites.

Q: How does the RTX 4060 compare to its nearest rivals in the database?

A: The RTX 4060’s average score of 17639 is 0.2% behind the AMD Radeon HD 7790 (17666), 0.3% ahead of the AMD Radeon 780M (17588), 0.5% ahead of the AMD Radeon Pro 560 (17551), and 0.7% ahead of the AMD Radeon Pro 460 (17509). These are all sub-1% differences.

Q: What is the memory configuration difference between the two cards?

A: The MI300A has 128 GB of HBM3 memory on a 8192-bit bus with 5.32 TB/s bandwidth. The RTX 4060 has 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 272.0 GB/s bandwidth. The MI300A’s memory bandwidth is roughly 19.5 times higher, based on the recorded figures.

Q: Which card supports modern graphics APIs?

A: The RTX 4060 supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The MI300A lists N/A for DirectX, OpenGL, and Vulkan, meaning no consumer graphics API support is recorded.

Q: What is the power requirement for each card?

A: The MI300A has a TDP of 750 W and a suggested PSU of 1150 W. The RTX 4060 has a TDP of 115 W and a suggested PSU of 300 W. The MI300A uses no power connectors, while the RTX 4060 uses a single 12-pin connector.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the RTX 4060?

A: The RTX 4060 has a launch MSRP of 299 USD. The MI300A has no launch MSRP recorded in the database.

Specification Differences

The two parts diverge sharply across nearly every specification field. The MI300A uses a 5 nm process with 153,000 million transistors on a 1017 mm² die, while the RTX 4060 uses the same 5 nm process but with 18,900 million transistors on a 159 mm² die. Transistor density is 150.4M per mm² for the MI300A versus 118.9M per mm² for the RTX 4060. Clock speeds differ: the MI300A runs at a base of 1000 MHz and boost of 2100 MHz, while the RTX 4060 runs at 1830 MHz base and 2460 MHz boost. Memory clocks are 1300 MHz (5.2 Gbps effective) for the MI300A and 2125 MHz (17 Gbps effective) for the RTX 4060. The MI300A has 14592 shading units and 912 TMUs but 0 ROPs, whereas the RTX 4060 has 3072 shading units, 96 TMUs, and 48 ROPs. Pixel rate is 0 MPixel/s for the MI300A and 118.1 GPixel/s for the RTX 4060. Texture rate is 1,915.2 GTexel/s for the MI300A versus 236.2 GTexel/s for the RTX 4060. FP32 compute is 61.29 TFLOPS for the MI300A and 15.11 TFLOPS for the RTX 4060; the RTX 4060 also records FP16 at 15.11 TFLOPS (1:1), while the MI300A has no FP16 figure. The MI300A is an OAM Module with no power connectors and no display outputs, while the RTX 4060 is a Dual-slot card measuring 240 mm by 111 mm by 40 mm, using one 12-pin connector. Bus interfaces differ: PCIe 5.0 x16 for the MI300A versus PCIe 4.0 x8 for the RTX 4060. The RTX 4060 has 24 RT cores and 96 tensor cores; the MI300A lists neither field.

Architecture Differences

The MI300A is built on AMD’s CDNA 3.0 architecture, codenamed Aqua Vanjaram, and belongs to the Instinct (MIx) generation. It targets compute acceleration with no graphics pipeline, as indicated by zero ROPs and no display outputs. The RTX 4060 uses NVIDIA’s Ada Lovelace architecture on the AD107 chip, part of the GeForce 40 series. It includes dedicated RT cores for ray tracing and tensor cores for AI workloads, features absent from the MI300A’s recorded specifications. The MI300A’s predecessor is Radeon Instinct, and the RTX 4060’s predecessor is GeForce 30, with a successor in GeForce 50. The MI300A’s process node and foundry match the RTX 4060: both use TSMC’s 5 nm process. The MI300A’s memory type is HBM3, designed for bandwidth density, while the RTX 4060 uses GDDR6, a mainstream graphics memory standard. The MI300A has no API support recorded, reinforcing its non-graphics role. The RTX 4060’s production status is end-of-life, while the MI300A has no production status listed. Release dates differ: the MI300A launched on 2023-12-05 and the RTX 4060 on 2023-05-17.

The Verdict

The data indicates these cards serve mutually exclusive purposes. The RTX 4060 is the only one with measurable performance, and its benchmark profile shows a mid-range consumer GPU that clusters tightly with older AMD cards. Its average score of 17639 at the 61st percentile means it outperforms a majority of database entries but offers no significant lead over its nearest rivals, all within 0.7%. The MI300A’s complete lack of benchmark data means no performance claims can be made from the database; its value rests entirely on its specification sheet. Users needing a functional graphics card with display outputs, DirectX 12 Ultimate support, and a 299 USD launch MSRP should select the RTX 4060. Users requiring massive memory capacity, 128 GB of HBM3, and compute throughput of 61.29 TFLOPS for non-rendering workloads should consider the MI300A, provided they have the 1150 W PSU and OAM slot it requires. The RTX 4060’s end-of-life status and the MI300A’s undefined production status mean availability is not guaranteed for either. The RTX 4060’s 8 GB memory and 128-bit bus limit its high-resolution gaming potential, while the MI300A’s 8192-bit bus and 5.32 TB/s bandwidth are unmatched in the recorded data. Choose based on workload: the RTX 4060 for any task requiring a screen, the MI300A for server-side compute where graphics output is irrelevant.