NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile vs Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded database contains benchmark results for the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile, while the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA currently has no benchmark entries. The RTX 5050 Mobile achieved a score of 2365 in the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test and 84171 in the Geekbench OpenCL test, producing an average benchmark score of 43268. The LX ULTRA has no recorded test scores, so its average benchmark score sits at zero. Direct head-to-head comparisons cannot be established from the data, as no paired test results exist for the two cards.

For the RTX 5050 Mobile, the average score places it at the 83rd percentile among all GPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals show a tightly clustered group: the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB scores 43262 with a 0% delta, the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 scores 43301 with a -0.1% delta, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER scores 43223 with a 0.1% delta, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile scores 43667 with a -0.9% delta. The RTX 5050 Mobile sits within 0.9% of all four rivals, indicating that its average performance is statistically indistinguishable from these established desktop and mobile parts. The LX ULTRA has no nearest rivals listed and no percentile ranking beyond the 50th percentile default, which reflects the absence of measured data rather than a performance estimate.

The biggest measurable win in the database belongs to the RTX 5050 Mobile, simply because it has recorded scores. Its Geekbench OpenCL result of 84171 demonstrates substantial compute throughput for a 50 W mobile part. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2365 provides a DirectX 12 gaming workload measurement. Without LX ULTRA scores, no relative win for that card can be quantified. The database shows the LX ULTRA as a card with specifications but no validated performance data, making any numerical comparison impossible.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from entirely different design lineages. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile uses the GB207 chip built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture, manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC. The chip contains 16,900 million transistors on a 149 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 113.4M per mm². The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA uses the 7G105 chip built on the TrueGPU architecture, manufactured on a 6 nm process, also at TSMC. Its transistor count and die size are listed as unknown in the database.

The shader configurations differ substantially. The RTX 5050 Mobile has 2560 shading units, 80 texture mapping units, 32 raster output units, 20 ray tracing cores, and 80 tensor cores. The LX ULTRA has 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs, but its ray tracing core count and tensor core count are listed as null. The LX ULTRA has 2.4 times the shading units, 2.4 times the TMUs, and 3 times the ROPs of the RTX 5050 Mobile. Pixel rate for the LX ULTRA is 192.0 GPixel/s versus 48.00 GPixel/s for the RTX 5050 Mobile, a 4x difference. Texture rate for the LX ULTRA is 384.0 GTexel/s versus 120.0 GTexel/s, a 3.2x difference.

Compute throughput shows the largest gap. The LX ULTRA delivers 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 and 49.15 TFLOPS FP16 with a 2:1 ratio. The RTX 5050 Mobile delivers 7.680 TFLOPS FP32 and 7.680 TFLOPS FP16 with a 1:1 ratio. The LX ULTRA has 3.2 times the FP32 throughput and 6.4 times the FP16 throughput. The RTX 5050 Mobile includes dedicated ray tracing and tensor hardware, while the LX ULTRA lists neither, suggesting a design focused on rasterization throughput rather than hybrid rendering features.

Both cards support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The RTX 5050 Mobile supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX ULTRA supports Vulkan 1.3. The API support is otherwise comparable, with the RTX 5050 Mobile having a one-version advantage in Vulkan.

The Verdict

The data clearly separates these two cards into different usage categories. The RTX 5050 Mobile is a low-power mobile GPU with a 50 W TDP, integrated form factor, and no power connectors. It has verified benchmark scores placing it at the 83rd percentile overall, with performance within 0.9% of the Quadro M6000 24 GB, Quadro M6000, RTX 4070 SUPER, and RTX 4090 Mobile. The LX ULTRA is a 225 W dual-slot card with a 16-pin connector, requiring a 550 W power supply, and has no benchmark scores in the database.

For users who need measured performance data, the RTX 5050 Mobile is the only card with evidence of real-world capability. Its 8 GB GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit bus delivers 384.0 GB/s bandwidth, and its 50 W power envelope fits portable devices. The LX ULTRA offers 24 GB GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth, 3 times the memory capacity and 12.5% more bandwidth. Its 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 throughput is 3.2 times higher than the RTX 5050 Mobile, but no test results confirm whether that theoretical throughput translates into actual benchmark wins.

The LX ULTRA targets a desktop environment with its dual-slot cooler, 268 mm length, 112 mm height, and 40 mm width. The RTX 5050 Mobile is an integrated mobile part with display outputs labeled as portable device dependent. The LX ULTRA has four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs, while the RTX 5050 Mobile relies on the host device for display connectivity. The RTX 5050 Mobile uses PCIe 5.0 x16, while the LX ULTRA uses PCIe 4.0 x16.

Based strictly on the database, the RTX 5050 Mobile is the card with proven performance, and the LX ULTRA is a specification sheet awaiting validation. The RTX 5050 Mobile's 83rd percentile ranking and tight clustering with the RTX 4070 SUPER and RTX 4090 Mobile indicate competitive average performance despite its modest 50 W budget. The LX ULTRA's 50th percentile default ranking reflects missing data, not a performance verdict.

Specification Differences

| Specification | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile | Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA |

|---|---|---|

| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | TrueGPU |

| Process Node | 5 nm | 6 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | TSMC |

| Transistors | 16,900 million | Unknown |

| Die Size | 149 mm² | Unknown |

| Memory Size | 8 GB | 24 GB |

| Memory Type | GDDR7 | GDDR6 |

| Memory Bus Width | 128 bit | 192 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | 384.0 GB/s | 432.0 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 2560 | 6144 |

| TMUs | 80 | 192 |

| ROPs | 32 | 96 |

| RT Cores | 20 | Null |

| Tensor Cores | 80 | Null |

| Pixel Rate | 48.00 GPixel/s | 192.0 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 120.0 GTexel/s | 384.0 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 7.680 TFLOPS | 24.58 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 7.680 TFLOPS (1:1) | 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| TDP | 50 W | 225 W |

| Slot Width | IGP | Dual-slot |

| Power Connectors | None | 1x 16-pin |

| Suggested PSU | Null | 550 W |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 5.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |

| Display Outputs | Portable Device Dependent | 4x DisplayPort 1.4a |

| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.3 |

| Release Date | 2025-06-23 | 2026-03-16 |

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has more memory bandwidth?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has 432.0 GB/s bandwidth versus 384.0 GB/s for the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile, a 12.5% advantage despite using GDDR6 instead of GDDR7.

Q: What is the FP32 performance difference?

A: The LX ULTRA delivers 24.58 TFLOPS FP32, which is 3.2 times the RTX 5050 Mobile's 7.680 TFLOPS.

Q: Does the RTX 5050 Mobile have ray tracing cores?

A: Yes, it has 20 ray tracing cores and 80 tensor cores. The LX ULTRA lists null for both categories in the database.

Q: What power connector does the LX ULTRA require?

A: The LX ULTRA uses a single 16-pin connector and has a 225 W TDP. The suggested power supply is 550 W. The RTX 5050 Mobile has no power connectors and a 50 W TDP.

Q: How well does the RTX 5050 Mobile rank among all GPUs?

A: Its average benchmark score of 43268 places it at the 83rd percentile. Its nearest rival, the RTX 4090 Mobile, scores 43667, which is only 0.9% higher.

Q: What is the memory configuration of each card?

A: The RTX 5050 Mobile has 8 GB of GDDR7 on a 128-bit bus. The LX ULTRA has 24 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, offering 3 times the capacity and a wider interface.

Q: Which card supports a newer Vulkan version?

A: The RTX 5050 Mobile supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX ULTRA supports Vulkan 1.3. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6.