NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile vs Lisuan Tech LX PRO Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains a full benchmark profile for the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile, while the Lisuan Tech LX PRO has no recorded benchmark scores. This makes a direct numerical comparison impossible on a test-by-test basis. However, the available data allows for a meaningful comparison through the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile's average benchmark score, its percentile ranking, and the LX PRO's theoretical compute figures.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile delivers an average benchmark score of 35435 across all recorded tests. This places it in the 80th percentile among all GPUs in the database. Its closest rivals, based on average score, are the NVIDIA Quadro GV100 at 35520 (0.2% higher), the AMD Radeon Pro Duo at 35860 (1.2% higher), the NVIDIA A2 at 34690 (2.1% lower), and the NVIDIA T1000 at 36289 (2.4% higher). The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile sits within a tight cluster of professional and workstation cards, all within roughly 2.5% of each other.

The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has no benchmark entries, so its average benchmark score is recorded as 0. Its percentile ranking is 50, which places it in the median position of the database distribution, but this figure is based on its specification profile rather than measured performance.

In raw compute specifications, the LX PRO presents a higher theoretical ceiling. Its FP32 throughput is 24.58 TFLOPS, which is 44% higher than the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile's 17.04 TFLOPS. The LX PRO also shows a texture rate of 384.0 GTexel/s, which is 44% higher than the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile's 266.2 GTexel/s. The pixel rate difference is more pronounced: the LX PRO delivers 192.0 GPixel/s versus 115.8 GPixel/s for the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile, a 66% advantage.

The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile counters with memory bandwidth. Its GDDR7 memory runs at 1750 MHz with 28 Gbps effective speed, producing 672.0 GB/s across a 192-bit bus. The LX PRO uses GDDR6 at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective, yielding 432.0 GB/s over the same 192-bit bus width. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile holds a 56% bandwidth advantage despite having half the memory capacity.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile wins in scenarios that depend on memory bandwidth and existing software optimization. Its 672.0 GB/s bandwidth is substantially higher than the LX PRO's 432.0 GB/s, which benefits high-resolution texture streaming, ray tracing workloads, and compute tasks that repeatedly access large datasets. The recorded Geekbench scores, 143870 in OpenCL and 139213 in Vulkan, indicate strong general compute performance in cross-platform benchmarks. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile also supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, matching the LX PRO's DirectX and OpenGL support while exceeding its Vulkan version (1.3).

The LX PRO wins in raw throughput categories. Its FP32 figure of 24.58 TFLOPS is 44% higher than the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile, which matters for workloads that are purely shader-bound and do not rely on specialized hardware. Its FP16 performance is 49.15 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio relative to FP32, compared to the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile's 17.04 TFLOPS at 1:1. This gives the LX PRO a 2.9x advantage in half-precision compute, which is relevant for AI inference and certain scientific workloads. The LX PRO also has more shading units (6144 versus 5888), more TMUs (192 versus 184), and more ROPs (96 versus 80).

The LX PRO's 24 GB memory capacity is double the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile's 12 GB. This is the clearest use-case split: the LX PRO targets large model inference, big dataset processing, and multi-application workflows where capacity matters more than speed. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile, with its higher bandwidth and lower power envelope, suits portable systems where thermal and electrical constraints are tight.

Architecture Differences

The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile uses the GB205 chip built on NVIDIA's Blackwell 2.0 architecture. It is manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC, containing 31,100 million transistors on a 263 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 118.3M per mm². The architecture includes 46 ray tracing cores and 184 tensor cores, which are absent from the LX PRO's specification sheet. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile's FP16 performance matches its FP32 at 17.04 TFLOPS, indicating a 1:1 ratio, which is typical for architectures that use the same execution units for both precision levels.

The LX PRO uses the 7G105 chip under the "TrueGPU" architecture, part of the 7G100 generation. It is built on a 6 nm TSMC process. Transistor count, die size, and transistor density are listed as unknown in the database. The LX PRO has no ray tracing cores and no tensor cores listed. Its FP16 performance is 49.15 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio, meaning the FP16 units run at twice the rate of FP32 units, a design choice for accelerated half-precision workloads.

The RTX 507 Ti Mobile relies on specialized tensor cores for AI tasks and RT cores for ray tracing. The LX PRO appears to be a pure rasterization design with no dedicated acceleration blocks, relying instead on raw shader throughput. The FP16 2:1 ratio on the LX PRO suggests an architecture optimized for half-precision compute, potentially for inference workloads, but without tensor cores the efficiency of that compute may differ from NVIDIA's approach.

Specification Differences

| Specification | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile | Lisuan Tech LX PRO |

|---|---|---|

| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | TrueGPU |

| Process node | 5 nm | 6 nm |

| Transistors | 31,100 million | unknown |

| Die size | 263 mm² | unknown |

| Base clock | 847 MHz | None listed |

| Boost clock | 1447 MHz | None listed |

| Memory size | 12 GB | 24 GB |

| Memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR6 |

| Memory clock | 1750 MHz, 28 Gbps effective | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective |

| Memory bandwidth | 672.0 GB/s | 432.0 GB/s |

| Shading units | 5888 | 6144 |

| TMUs | 184 | 192 |

| ROPs | 80 | 96 |

| RT cores | 46 | None |

| Tensor cores | 184 | None |

| FP32 | 17.04 TFLOPS | 24.58 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 17.04 TFLOPS (1:1) | 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| Pixel rate | 115.8 GPixel/s | 192.0 GPixel/s |

| Texture rate | 266.2 GTexel/s | 384.0 GTexel/s |

| TDP | 60 W | 225 W |

| Slot width | IGP | Dual-slot |

| Power connectors | None | 1x 16-pin |

| Suggested PSU | None listed | 550 W |

| Bus interface | PCIe 5.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |

| Display outputs | Portable Device Dependent | 4x DisplayPort 1.4a |

| Vulkan version | 1.4 | 1.3 |

| Release date | 2025-02-28 | 2026-03-16 |

The power envelope difference is stark. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile draws 60 W with no power connectors, designed as an integrated GPU package (IGP). The LX PRO draws 225 W, requires a 16-pin connector, a 550 W suggested PSU, and occupies a dual-slot form factor. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is PCIe 5.0 x16 while the LX PRO uses PCIe 4.0 x16. The LX PRO has explicit dimensions (248 mm length, 118 mm height, 48 mm width), while the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile's dimensions are not recorded.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher memory bandwidth?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has 672.0 GB/s, which is 56% higher than the Lisuan Tech LX PRO's 432.0 GB/s, despite both using a 192-bit bus.

Q: Does the Lisuan Tech LX PRO support ray tracing?

A: The database lists no ray tracing cores for the LX PRO. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile includes 46 RT cores. The LX PRO's feature set appears limited to rasterization and compute.

Q: How do the FP32 compute figures compare?

A: The LX PRO delivers 24.58 TFLOPS FP32, which is 44% higher than the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile's 17.04 TFLOPS. The LX PRO also has more shading units (6144 vs 5888).

Q: What is the power consumption difference?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has a TDP of 60 W and no power connectors. The LX PRO has a TDP of 225 W, requires a 16-pin power connector, and a 550 W suggested PSU.

Q: Which GPU has more memory capacity?

A: The LX PRO has 24 GB of GDDR6, double the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile's 12 GB of GDDR7. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile compensates with higher bandwidth.

Q: What benchmark scores are available for each GPU?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has recorded scores including Geekbench OpenCL at 143870, Geekbench Vulkan at 139213, Passmark G3D at 24004, and Passmark GPU Compute at 10101, with an average score of 35435. The LX PRO has no recorded benchmark scores.

The Verdict

The data shows two fundamentally different products. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is a low-power, high-bandwidth mobile GPU with ray tracing and tensor core support, designed to fit within a 60 W envelope. Its benchmark profile is solid: the average score of 35435 places it in the 80th percentile, tightly grouped with professional cards like the Quadro GV100 and T1000. Its 672.0 GB/s bandwidth is a genuine advantage for texture-heavy and memory-intensive workloads.

The LX PRO is a high-power desktop card with double the memory, higher raw compute, and no specialized acceleration hardware. Its 24 GB capacity and 49.15 TFLOPS FP16 throughput suggest a purpose-built compute card for large datasets and half-precision workloads. But the absence of any recorded benchmarks means its real-world performance is unverified in the database. The 50th percentile ranking is a default position, not a measured result.

For mobile workstations and portable systems, the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is the only viable choice given the 60 W TDP and IGP form factor. For a desktop workstation requiring maximum memory capacity and raw shader throughput, the LX PRO offers compelling specifications on paper. However, without benchmark data, its actual competitiveness against the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile's measured scores remains uncertain. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has proven performance; the LX PRO has theoretical specifications. Buyers who need verified results should favor the NVIDIA part, while those who prioritize capacity and raw compute numbers may consider the LX PRO.