GPU Comparison

AMD
RADEON

AMD Radeon 890M

CORE STATE Strix Point
VRAM System Shared
CLOCK SPEED 2900 MHz
TDP 15 W
BUS WIDTH System Shared
ARCHITECTURE RDNA 3.5
nm
PROCESS 4 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

T400

CORE STATE TU117
VRAM 2 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1425 MHz
TDP 30 W
BUS WIDTH 64 bit
ARCHITECTURE Turing
nm
PROCESS 12 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2021

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
590
N/A
geekbench_opencl
37,254
17,039
geekbench_vulkan
40,808
15,976
passmark_directx_10
33
N/A
passmark_directx_11
73
N/A
passmark_directx_12
37
N/A
passmark_directx_9
97
N/A
passmark_g2d
979
N/A
passmark_g3d
8,076
N/A
passmark_gpu_compute
4,157
N/A

Analysis: AMD Radeon 890M vs NVIDIA T400

Rendering performance benchmarks between the AMD Radeon 890M card from AMD and NVIDIA's NVIDIA T400 graphics demonstrate a decisive victor. the AMD Radeon 890M card from AMD offers notably stronger FPS throughout contemporary games. The video memory advantage and design improvements lead into clearly better gaming performance. Performance results validates this finding. Players demanding high-end performance would consider this.

The VRAM edge of the AMD Radeon 890M card from AMD turns particularly important at increased detail settings. Demanding rendering needs significant graphics memory, and the AMD Radeon 890M card from AMD delivers greater capacity. The converts into improved frame rates in memory-intensive scenarios. Modern releases should only need more VRAM. The edge increases over time.

The graphics memory benefit of the AMD Radeon 890M card from AMD gets more important at demanding quality levels. 4K workloads requires notable graphics memory, and the AMD Radeon 890M card from AMD provides additional capability. This converts into better performance in heavy titles. Upcoming games will only require extra VRAM. This benefit expands over time.

NVIDIA's NVIDIA T400 graphics cannot be ignored completely, though the benchmark shortfall relative to the AMD Radeon 890M card from AMD is tough to dismiss. In budget-conscious builders, NVIDIA's NVIDIA T400 graphics could nevertheless be sense if its lower MSRP adjusts for the lesser capabilities. Nevertheless, for raw visual power, the AMD Radeon 890M card from AMD stands as the obvious victor. This determination is clear. Power enthusiasts should gravitate toward the AMD Radeon 890M card from AMD.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
890M
T400
Core Specs
Shading Units
1,024
384 -62.5%
Shaders
1,024
384 -62.5%
TMUs
64
24 -62.5%
ROPs
32
16 -50.0%
Compute Units
16
SM Count
6
Clocks
Base Clock
400 MHz
420 MHz
Boost Clock
2900 MHz
1425 MHz
Memory Clock
System Shared
1250 MHz 10 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
System Shared
2 GB
VRAM (MB)
2,048
Memory Type
System Shared
GDDR6
Memory Bus
System Shared
64 bit
Bandwidth
System Dependent
80.00 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
64 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
2 MB
1024 KB
L0 Cache
32 KB per WGP
Performance
Pixel Rate
92.80 GPixel/s
22.80 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
185.6 GTexel/s
34.20 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
5.939 TFLOPS
1,094.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
371.2 GFLOPS (1:16)
34.20 GFLOPS (1:32)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
5.939 TFLOPS (1:1)
2.189 TFLOPS (2:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
16
Power
TDP
15 W
30 W
TDP (W)
15
30 +100.0%
Suggested PSU
200 W
Power Connectors
None
None
Architecture
Architecture
RDNA 3.5
Turing
GPU Name
Strix Point
TU117
Generation
Navi III IGP (Strix Point Mobile)
Quadro Turing (Tx000)
Process Size
4 nm
12 nm
Transistors
34,000 million
4,700 million
Die Size
233 mm²
200 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
TSMC
Density
145.9M / mm²
23.5M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 (12_1)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
2.1
3.0
CUDA
7.5
Shader Model
6.8
6.8
Physical
Slot Width
IGP
Single-slot
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
PCIe 3.0 x16
Other
Production
Active
End-of-life
Predecessor
Navi II IGP
Quadro Volta
Successor
Workstation Ampere
View Radeon 890M Details View T400 Details