GPU Comparison

NVIDIA
GEFORCE

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation

CORE STATE AD107
VRAM 16 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2130 MHz
TDP 70 W
BUS WIDTH 128 bit
ARCHITECTURE Ada Lovelace
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

T1000

CORE STATE TU117
VRAM 4 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1395 MHz
TDP 50 W
BUS WIDTH 128 bit
ARCHITECTURE Turing
nm
PROCESS 12 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2021

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
1,767
N/A
geekbench_opencl
78,074
37,704
geekbench_vulkan
83,360
34,874
passmark_directx_10
82
N/A
passmark_directx_11
138
N/A
passmark_directx_12
71
N/A
passmark_directx_9
216
N/A
passmark_g2d
1,072
N/A
passmark_g3d
16,927
N/A
passmark_gpu_compute
7,834
N/A

Analysis: NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA T1000

Visual performance comparisons between GeForce RTX 2000 and NVIDIA T1000 show a definite leader. GeForce RTX 2000 offers notably higher performance throughout contemporary AAA releases. This VRAM superiority and engineering upgrades convert into noticeably smoother rendering quality. Score numbers validates this assessment. Gamers looking for premium visuals would pay attention.

For RT, GeForce RTX 2000 leaps considerably forward of NVIDIA T1000. Its RT units handle heavy global illumination calculations far more efficiently. Enthusiasts demanding premium visuals should definitely consider GeForce RTX 2000. The real-time ray tracing superiority is significant. Current releases progressively use RT capabilities.

NVIDIA T1000 encounters issues to compete with GeForce RTX 2000's absolute capability. In price-conscious builders, NVIDIA T1000 might nonetheless deliver adequate results, though users wanting the best performance should gravitate toward GeForce RTX 2000. This benchmark gap is sufficiently considerable to overlook. Intensive workloads particularly demonstrate this margin. The cost difference provides benefits in capability.

When buyers considering a investment determination, GeForce RTX 2000 comes out as the preferred choice. Its steady frame rate edge over NVIDIA T1000 renders it the better investment for demanding builders. Evaluate your individual needs, yet the results leads toward GeForce RTX 2000. Reach an educated choice. The frame rate gap is real and substantial.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
T1000
Core Specs
Shading Units
2,816
896 -68.2%
Shaders
2,816
896 -68.2%
TMUs
88
56 -36.4%
ROPs
48
32 -33.3%
SM Count
22
14 -36.4%
Clocks
Base Clock
1620 MHz
1065 MHz
Boost Clock
2130 MHz
1395 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz 16 Gbps effective
1250 MHz 10 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
16 GB
4 GB
VRAM (MB)
16,384
4,096 -75.0%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory Bus
128 bit
128 bit
Bandwidth
256.0 GB/s
160.0 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
64 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
12 MB
1024 KB
Performance
Pixel Rate
102.2 GPixel/s
44.64 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
187.4 GTexel/s
78.12 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
12.00 TFLOPS
2.500 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
187.4 GFLOPS (1:64)
78.12 GFLOPS (1:32)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
12.00 TFLOPS (1:1)
5.000 TFLOPS (2:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
22
Tensor Cores
88
Power
TDP
70 W
50 W
TDP (W)
70
50 -28.6%
Suggested PSU
250 W
250 W
Power Connectors
None
None
Architecture
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
Turing
GPU Name
AD107
TU117
Generation
Workstation Ada (x000A)
Quadro Turing (Tx000)
Process Size
5 nm
12 nm
Transistors
18,900 million
4,700 million
Die Size
159 mm²
200 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
TSMC
Density
118.9M / mm²
23.5M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 (12_1)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
3.0
3.0
CUDA
8.9
7.5
Shader Model
6.9
6.8
Physical
Slot Width
Dual-slot
Single-slot
Length
168 mm 6.6 inches
156 mm 6.1 inches
Height
69 mm 2.7 inches
69 mm 2.7 inches
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
PCIe 3.0 x16
Other
Launch Price
649 USD
Production
Active
End-of-life
Predecessor
Workstation Ampere
Quadro Volta
Successor
Blackwell PRO W
Workstation Ampere
View RTX 2000 Ada Generation Details View T1000 Details