NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server vs Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA Comparison

The NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server and the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA represent two distinct approaches to workstation graphics, and the recorded data shows a stark contrast in their benchmark positioning and architectural priorities. The NVIDIA card delivers a single recorded 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5996, while the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, resulting in an average score of 0. This fundamental difference in measured performance is the primary takeaway from the head-to-head data.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark results for these two cards, so the comparison relies on the individual recorded scores and the nearest rival data. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server posts a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5996. This places it at the 34th percentile of all GPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals, based on average score, are the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M at 6000 (a delta of -0.1%), the AMD Radeon RX 6400 at 6001 (a delta of -0.1%), the AMD FirePro W4100 at 5987 (a delta of 0.2%), and the NVIDIA Quadro K4000M at 5986 (a delta of 0.2%). The benchmark results indicate that the RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server is effectively tied with these older, lower-tier cards in this specific test, despite its massive architectural advantages. The performance difference is within 0.2% across all four rivals, suggesting that the Steel Nomad workload does not scale with the RTX PRO 6000's raw compute resources.

The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has no recorded benchmarks, meaning its average benchmark score is zero and it holds no nearest rival entries. The data shows no wins for either card in the head-to-head section, as the headToHeadBenchmarks array is empty. This absence of data for the LX ULTRA makes a direct numerical comparison impossible; the only conclusion available is that the NVIDIA card has a measurable score while the Lisuan card does not. For the NVIDIA card, the 5996 score is its sole benchmark, and the percentile data confirms it sits in the lower third of all recorded GPUs, which is surprising given its specifications but is what the measurements show.

FAQ

Q: What is the recorded 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score for the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server?

A: The NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server records a score of 5996 in the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test. This places it at the 34th percentile of all GPUs in the database.

Q: Does the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA have any benchmark scores in the database?

A: No. The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has an empty benchmarks array and an average benchmark score of 0. It also has no nearest rival entries.

Q: How does the NVIDIA card compare to its nearest rivals in average score?

A: The NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server is within 0.2% of four rivals: the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M (6000, -0.1%), AMD Radeon RX 6400 (6001, -0.1%), AMD FirePro W4100 (5987, 0.2%), and NVIDIA Quadro K4000M (5986, 0.2%). The deltas are negligible.

Q: What are the memory specifications for each card?

A: The NVIDIA card uses 96 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 512-bit bus with 1.79 TB/s bandwidth. The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA uses 24 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Which card has a higher FP32 compute rating?

A: The NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server delivers 126.0 TFLOPS FP32, while the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA delivers 24.58 TFLOPS FP32. The NVIDIA card also provides 126.0 TFLOPS FP16 (1:1), whereas the Lisuan card provides 49.15 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1).

Q: What are the TDP requirements for each card?

A: The NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server has a TDP of 600 W with a suggested PSU of 1000 W. The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has a TDP of 225 W with a suggested PSU of 550 W.

Architecture Differences

The two cards use fundamentally different silicon. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server is built on the GB202 chip using the Blackwell 2.0 architecture, fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC. It contains 92,200 million transistors on a 750 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 122.9M per mm². The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA uses the 7G105 chip with the TrueGPU architecture, fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC. Its transistor count and die size are listed as unknown, and no transistor density is provided. These process differences are minor in node size, but the NVIDIA card's much larger die and transistor count indicate a far more complex design.

The NVIDIA card features 24,064 shading units, 752 TMUs, and 192 ROPs. It also includes 188 ray tracing cores and 752 tensor cores, which are absent from the Lisuan card's specification sheet (both rtCores and tensorCores are null). The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has 6,144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs, with no RT or tensor core data. In terms of memory, the NVIDIA card uses 96 GB of GDDR7 on a 512-bit bus, while the Lisuan card uses 24 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus. The NVIDIA card supports PCIe 5.0 x16 and DisplayPort 2.1b outputs, whereas the Lisuan card uses PCIe 4.0 x16 and DisplayPort 1.4a outputs. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6, but the NVIDIA card supports Vulkan 1.4 while the Lisuan card supports Vulkan 1.3.

The NVIDIA card's release date is recorded as 2025-03-17, with a predecessor of Server Hopper and a successor of Server Rubin. The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has a release date of 2026-03-16 and no predecessor or successor listed. The NVIDIA card is in the Server Blackwell (Bxx) generation, while the Lisuan card is in the 7G100 generation.

The Verdict

Based strictly on the recorded data, the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server is the only card with a measurable benchmark score. Its 5996 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, while modest relative to its architectural specs, is a concrete data point. The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has no recorded benchmarks, so its performance profile is entirely absent from the database. For any user relying on the database for performance validation, the NVIDIA card has verifiable results; the Lisuan card does not.

The NVIDIA card's specifications are overwhelmingly higher: 126.0 TFLOPS FP32 versus 24.58 TFLOPS, 96 GB versus 24 GB of memory, and 1.79 TB/s versus 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The NVIDIA card also has 24,064 shading units versus 6,144, and 188 RT cores versus none listed. However, the benchmark score of 5996 does not reflect this advantage, as it sits at the 34th percentile and is nearly identical to a GeForce GTX 770M. This suggests the Steel Nomad workload is not representative of these cards' intended server workloads. The Lisuan card's 50th percentile ranking (with zero average score) is based on its position in the database, not on any measured performance.

For a user choosing between these two, the data supports the NVIDIA card for any task requiring the documented throughput numbers, such as FP32 compute or memory bandwidth. The Lisuan card wins on power efficiency: 225 W TDP versus 600 W, with a suggested PSU of 550 W versus 1000 W. The Lisuan card is also smaller in memory footprint and uses a simpler architecture with no RT or tensor cores, which may be sufficient for specific workloads but cannot be verified from benchmark results. The verdict is clear: the NVIDIA card has the data and the specs, the Lisuan card has neither in terms of measured performance.

Specification Differences

The two cards differ across nearly every specification field. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server uses a 5 nm process, while the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA uses a 6 nm process. The NVIDIA chip (GB202) has 92,200 million transistors on a 750 mm² die, while the Lisuan chip (7G105) has unknown transistor count and die size. The NVIDIA card has a base clock of 1590 MHz and a boost clock of 2617 MHz, while the Lisuan card has no base or boost clock listed. Memory clocks differ: the NVIDIA card uses 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective), while the Lisuan card uses 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective).

Memory configuration is a major split: 96 GB GDDR7 on a 512-bit bus for NVIDIA, versus 24 GB GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus for Lisuan. The NVIDIA card has 24,064 shading units, 752 TMUs, 192 ROPs, 188 RT cores, and 752 tensor cores. The Lisuan card has 6,144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs, with no RT or tensor cores listed. Pixel and texture rates reflect this: NVIDIA at 502.5 GPixel/s and 1,968.0 GTexel/s, Lisuan at 192.0 GPixel/s and 384.0 GTexel/s. FP32 is 126.0 TFLOPS versus 24.58 TFLOPS, and FP16 is 126.0 TFLOPS (1:1) versus 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1).

TDP is 600 W for NVIDIA versus 225 W for Lisuan. Both are dual-slot with a single 16-pin power connector, but the suggested PSU is 1000 W for NVIDIA and 550 W for Lisuan. Bus interfaces differ: PCIe 5.0 x16 versus PCIe 4.0 x16. Display outputs are 4x DisplayPort 2.1b for NVIDIA and 4x DisplayPort 1.4a for Lisuan. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6, but Vulkan support is 1.4 for NVIDIA and 1.3 for Lisuan. The NVIDIA card is 267 mm long, 111 mm high, and 40 mm wide; the Lisuan card is 268 mm long, 112 mm high, and 40 mm wide.

Where Each One Wins

The NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server wins in every measurable performance category. Its FP32 throughput of 126.0 TFLOPS is more than five times the Lisuan card's 24.58 TFLOPS. Its memory bandwidth of 1.79 TB/s is over four times the Lisuan card's 432.0 GB/s. The NVIDIA card has 188 RT cores and 752 tensor cores, while the Lisuan card has none listed. The NVIDIA card's pixel rate of 502.5 GPixel/s and texture rate of 1,968.0 GTexel/s are both significantly higher than the Lisuan card's 192.0 GPixel/s and 384.0 GTexel/s. The NVIDIA card also supports a newer PCIe revision (5.0 versus 4.0) and a newer DisplayPort standard (2.1b versus 1.4a). For any workload that relies on raw compute, ray tracing, tensor operations, or memory capacity, the NVIDIA card is the clear choice based on the specifications.

The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA wins on power efficiency and system integration. Its 225 W TDP is 37.5% of the NVIDIA card's 600 W, and its suggested PSU of 550 W is significantly lower than the NVIDIA card's 1000 W. This makes the Lisuan card suitable for systems with smaller power delivery capabilities. The Lisuan card also uses a smaller memory footprint (24 GB versus 96 GB), which may be sufficient for tasks that do not require large datasets. Its FP16 performance of 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1) is higher than its FP32 rate, indicating a design that favors mixed-precision workloads, though the absolute number is still lower than the NVIDIA card's FP16. The Lisuan card has a later release date (2026-03-16 versus 2025-03-17), suggesting a newer product cycle. The Lisuan card also has no recorded benchmark scores, so in terms of verified performance, the NVIDIA card wins by default; the Lisuan card's only documented advantages are its power draw and PSU requirement.