NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server vs Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data contains only one benchmark result for the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server, a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5996. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has no benchmark entries in the database, and there are no head-to-head comparisons available. This absence of direct comparative data makes a conventional win/loss breakdown impossible. Instead, the analysis must rely on the single recorded score for the NVIDIA card and its position relative to other GPUs in the database.

The NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server's score of 5996 places it at the 34th percentile among all GPUs tracked. Its nearest rivals in the database are the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M with an average score of 6000, a delta of -0.1 percent, and the AMD Radeon RX 6400, also at 6001 with a -0.1 percent delta. The AMD FirePro W4100 scores 5987, putting the NVIDIA card 0.2 percent ahead, and the NVIDIA Quadro K4000M sits at 5986, also 0.2 percent behind. These deltas are extraordinarily small, indicating that the RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server's measured performance in this specific test is nearly identical to a set of much older, lower-tier mobile and entry-level desktop GPUs. The data suggests the 3DMark Steel Nomad workload, which is a DX12 test, does not scale with the RTX PRO 6000's massive compute resources, or that the measured score reflects a driver or configuration state that is not representative of its theoretical capacity.

For the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100, the database records an average benchmark score of zero, a 50th percentile ranking, and no nearest rivals. A zero score typically indicates the absence of any submitted or validated benchmark run. The 50th percentile value appears to be a placeholder or default assignment rather than a computed ranking, as a percentile cannot be derived without a score. Therefore, the data cannot confirm any performance level for this GPU, and any comparison between the two cards in terms of measured performance is not supported by the available records.

FAQ

Q: What is the only recorded benchmark score for the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server?

A: The database contains a single 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5996 for the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server.

Q: Does the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 have any benchmark results?

A: No, the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has an empty benchmarks list and an average benchmark score of zero, indicating no recorded performance data.

Q: How does the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server compare to its nearest rivals?

A: Its score of 5996 is 0.1 percent behind both the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M (6000) and the AMD Radeon RX 6400 (6001), and 0.2 percent ahead of the AMD FirePro W4100 (5987) and the NVIDIA Quadro K4000M (5986).

Q: What is the memory configuration difference between the two GPUs?

A: The NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server has 96 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 512-bit bus with 1.79 TB/s bandwidth, while the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What are the process node and architecture differences?

A: The NVIDIA card uses a 5 nm process at TSMC with a Blackwell 2.0 architecture and the GB202 chip. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 uses a 6 nm process at TSMC with a TrueGPU architecture and the 7G106 chip.

Q: Which card has higher pixel and texture rates?

A: The NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server delivers 502.5 GPixel/s and 1,968.0 GTexel/s, while the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 delivers 192.0 GPixel/s and 384.0 GTexel/s.

The Verdict

Based strictly on the recorded data, the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server is the only card with a measurable benchmark result. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 5996, while modest in the context of its specifications, is at least a real data point. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has no benchmark entries, no average score, and no rivals, making its performance entirely unquantified in this database.

For any user relying on the database to compare actual performance, the NVIDIA card is the only option with evidence of operation. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 cannot be recommended on the basis of measured results because none exist. However, the NVIDIA card's percentile ranking of 34 and its near-identical score to the GTX 770M and RX 6400 raise questions about its real-world standing in this specific test. The data does not support a claim that the RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server dominates its nearest rivals; it is statistically tied with them in the Steel Nomad run.

The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100's specifications, such as 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 12 GB of memory, are present in the database, but without benchmark confirmation, those numbers remain theoretical. The verdict is therefore split: the NVIDIA card has measured data but a low percentile, while the Lisuan card has specifications but no validation. From a pure data standpoint, the NVIDIA card is the safer choice because its performance is at least known, even if that knowledge is limited to a single test.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ across nearly every recorded specification. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server uses the GB202 chip with a Blackwell 2.0 architecture on a 5 nm process at TSMC, with 92,200 million transistors on a 750 mm² die and a transistor density of 122.9M per mm². The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 uses the 7G106 chip with a TrueGPU architecture on a 6 nm process, also at TSMC, but its transistor count, die size, and density are all listed as unknown.

Clock speeds differ substantially. The NVIDIA card has a base clock of 1590 MHz and a boost clock of 2617 MHz, with memory at 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective). The Lisuan card has no base or boost clock listed, and its memory runs at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective).

Memory configurations are vastly different: the NVIDIA card has 96 GB of GDDR7 on a 512-bit bus with 1.79 TB/s bandwidth, while the Lisuan card has 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. The NVIDIA card has 24,064 shading units, 752 TMUs, 192 ROPs, 188 RT cores, and 752 tensor cores. The Lisuan card has 6,144 shading units, 192 TMUs, 96 ROPs, and no recorded RT or tensor cores.

Pixel and texture rates also differ: the NVIDIA card outputs 502.5 GPixel/s and 1,968.0 GTexel/s, versus 192.0 GPixel/s and 384.0 GTexel/s for the Lisuan card. FP32 performance is 126.0 TFLOPS for the NVIDIA card, while the Lisuan card delivers 24.58 TFLOPS. FP16 performance is 126.0 TFLOPS (1:1) for the NVIDIA card and 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1) for the Lisuan card.

Power requirements diverge sharply: the NVIDIA card has a 600 W TDP, a single 16-pin connector, and a suggested PSU of 1000 W. The Lisuan card has a 225 W TDP, a single 8-pin connector, and a suggested PSU of 550 W. The bus interface is PCIe 5.0 x16 for the NVIDIA card and PCIe 4.0 x16 for the Lisuan card. Display outputs are 4x DisplayPort 2.1b versus 4x DisplayPort 1.4a. Physical dimensions differ as well: the NVIDIA card is 267 mm long, 111 mm tall, and 40 mm wide, while the Lisuan card is 294 mm long, 120 mm tall, and 49 mm wide. Both are dual-slot.

Architecture Differences

The architectural split is fundamental. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server belongs to the Server Blackwell (Bxx) generation with a Blackwell 2.0 architecture, a successor to Server Hopper and a predecessor to Server Rubin. Its release date is recorded as 2025-03-17. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 belongs to the 7G100 generation with a TrueGPU architecture, has no predecessor or successor listed, and carries a release date of 2026-06-17.

The NVIDIA card's silicon is built on a 5 nm TSMC process with 92,200 million transistors and a 750 mm² die. The Lisuan card uses a 6 nm TSMC process with an unknown transistor count and die size. The NVIDIA card integrates 24,064 shading units, 752 TMUs, 192 ROPs, 188 RT cores, and 752 tensor cores, reflecting a design that includes dedicated ray tracing and tensor processing hardware. The Lisuan card has 6,144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs, with no RT cores or tensor cores listed, suggesting a simpler compute-focused design without dedicated acceleration for those workloads.

The FP16 ratio also indicates different compute philosophies: the NVIDIA card delivers FP16 at a 1:1 ratio with FP32, meaning equal throughput for both formats, while the Lisuan card provides FP16 at a 2:1 ratio, doubling its FP16 rate relative to FP32. This suggests the NVIDIA architecture prioritizes consistent performance across precision formats, while the Lisuan architecture emphasizes higher throughput in reduced precision. The NVIDIA card's API support includes DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, while the Lisuan card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.3, a minor version difference in the Vulkan API.

Where Each One Wins

The NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server wins on every measured or specified compute metric in the database. Its FP32 throughput of 126.0 TFLOPS is over five times the Lisuan card's 24.58 TFLOPS. Its FP16 output of 126.0 TFLOPS (1:1) is more than double the Lisuan card's 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1). The NVIDIA card's pixel rate of 502.5 GPixel/s is 2.6 times higher than the Lisuan card's 192.0 GPixel/s, and its texture rate of 1,968.0 GTexel/s is over five times the Lisuan card's 384.0 GTexel/s.

Memory capacity and bandwidth also favor the NVIDIA card decisively: 96 GB versus 12 GB, and 1.79 TB/s versus 432.0 GB/s. The NVIDIA card has more shading units (24,064 versus 6,144), more TMUs (752 versus 192), more ROPs (192 versus 96), and it has RT cores and tensor cores that the Lisuan card lacks entirely. The NVIDIA card also has a faster bus interface (PCIe 5.0 x16 versus PCIe 4.0 x16) and newer display outputs (DisplayPort 2.1b versus 1.4a). It uses a newer process node (5 nm versus 6 nm) and has a later architecture generation (Blackwell 2.0 versus TrueGPU).

The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 wins in areas of power efficiency and physical practicality. Its TDP of 225 W is 375 W lower than the NVIDIA card's 600 W, and its suggested PSU of 550 W is 450 W lower than the NVIDIA card's 1000 W requirement. It uses a single 8-pin power connector instead of a 16-pin connector. The Lisuan card is also shorter in length? No, the data shows the Lisuan card is longer at 294 mm versus 267 mm, taller at 120 mm versus 111 mm, and wider at 49 mm versus 40 mm. So the NVIDIA card is actually more compact in all dimensions despite its higher power draw. The Lisuan card has a higher memory clock of 2250 MHz versus 1750 MHz, but this does not compensate for its narrower bus and lower bandwidth.

The Lisuan card's TrueGPU architecture and 6 nm process are its distinguishing features, but without benchmark data, its real-world advantages cannot be quantified. The NVIDIA card's recorded benchmark score, while low in percentile, confirms it can execute a DX12 workload, whereas the Lisuan card has no such confirmation. In every measurable category except power consumption and memory clock speed, the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server holds the advantage in the recorded data.