NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell vs Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data presents an unusual comparison. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell has a complete set of recorded benchmark scores, while the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has no recorded benchmarks in the database. This means the head-to-head comparison relies entirely on the NVIDIA card's absolute performance and its position relative to other GPUs, not on direct measurements against the Lisuan product.

The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell delivers an average benchmark score of 25,269 across ten tests. This places it in the 70th percentile of all GPUs tracked. The nearest rivals in the database show how tightly grouped this performance tier is. The AMD Radeon RX 6700M averages 25,633, which is 1.4% ahead of the RTX PRO 2000. The AMD Radeon Pro W5700 scores 25,726, 1.8% higher. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile also sits 1.8% ahead with 25,740. Only the NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile sits behind, averaging 24,763, which is 2% slower than the RTX PRO 2000.

The individual benchmark results for the RTX PRO 2000 show a wide spread across test types. In Geekbench Vulkan, the card reaches 113,865 points, while Geekbench OpenCL scores 106,087. The Passmark G3D score is 20,049, and the Passmark GPU Compute score is 8,396. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test produces a score of 2,374.5. The legacy DirectX tests show lower figures: Passmark DirectX 10 scores 122, DirectX 11 scores 174, DirectX 12 scores 80, and DirectX 9 scores 241. The 2D test records 1,303 points.

The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has zero benchmarks recorded. Its average benchmark score is listed as 0, and it holds a 50th percentile position with no nearest rivals. The database shows no wins for either card in direct head-to-head tests because no such tests exist. The RTX PRO 2000's performance can be characterized relative to its known rivals, but no direct comparison to the LX ULTRA is possible from the recorded data.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs use fundamentally different designs. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell uses the GB206 chip built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. It is manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC, with 21,900 million transistors packed into a 181 mm² die. This produces a transistor density of 121.0 million per square millimeter. The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA uses the 7G105 chip on the TrueGPU architecture, built on a 6 nm process, also at TSMC. Its transistor count and die size are listed as unknown.

The processing resources differ substantially. The RTX PRO 2000 contains 4,352 shading units, 136 texture mapping units, and 48 raster output units. It includes 34 RT cores and 136 tensor cores. The LX ULTRA has higher raw counts: 6,144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. The Lisuan card lists no RT core or tensor core counts in the database.

Clock behavior also differs. The RTX PRO 2000 has specified clocks: 982 MHz base and 1,957 MHz boost. The LX ULTRA lists no base or boost clock. Memory clocks show the RTX PRO 2000 at 1,125 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed, while the LX ULTRA runs at 2,250 MHz with the same 18 Gbps effective speed.

The memory subsystems diverge in capacity and bandwidth. The RTX PRO 2000 uses 16 GB of GDDR7 on a 128-bit bus, delivering 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The LX ULTRA uses 24 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, delivering 432.0 GB/s. The wider bus and larger capacity give the Lisuan card a clear memory advantage.

Interface and connectivity differ as well. The RTX PRO 2000 uses PCIe 5.0 x8, while the LX ULTRA uses PCIe 4.0 x16. Display outputs are 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1b on the NVIDIA card versus 4x DisplayPort 1.4a on the Lisuan card. The NVIDIA card supports Vulkan 1.4, while the Lisuan card supports Vulkan 1.3. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6.

Power characteristics show a striking contrast. The RTX PRO 2000 has a 70 W TDP, requires no power connectors, and suggests a 250 W PSU. The LX ULTRA has a 225 W TDP, uses a single 16-pin connector, and suggests a 550 W PSU. Physical dimensions also differ: the RTX PRO 2000 measures 167 mm in length, 69 mm in height, and 20 mm in width. The LX ULTRA measures 268 mm in length, 112 mm in height, and 40 mm in width. Both are dual-slot cards.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell wins in efficiency and feature set. Its 70 W TDP is a fraction of the LX ULTRA's 225 W. It requires no external power connectors, making installation simpler in constrained systems. The card supports the newer PCIe 5.0 interface and DisplayPort 2.1b outputs, both of which are more current than the LX ULTRA's PCIe 4.0 and DisplayPort 1.4a. The NVIDIA card also includes dedicated RT cores and tensor cores, which the Lisuan card lacks according to the recorded data. Its Vulkan 1.4 support is newer than the LX ULTRA's Vulkan 1.3.

The RTX PRO 2000 has a complete benchmark profile. Its performance places it just below the AMD Radeon RX 6700M and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile, and just above the NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile. The differences are small, within 2% in either direction, indicating a well-established performance tier.

The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA wins on raw specifications. It offers 24 GB of memory versus 16 GB, a 192-bit bus versus 128-bit, and 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth versus 288.0 GB/s. Its compute resources are higher: 6,144 shading units versus 4,352, 192 TMUs versus 136, and 96 ROPs versus 48. The FP32 throughput is 24.58 TFLOPS versus 17.03 TFLOPS. In FP16, the LX ULTRA reaches 49.15 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio, while the RTX PRO 2000 delivers 17.03 TFLOPS at a 1:1 ratio. Pixel rate is 192.0 GPixel/s versus 93.94 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 384.0 GTexel/s versus 266.2 GTexel/s.

The Lisuan card also has a more recent release date, coming after the RTX PRO 2000. Its production status is active, matching the NVIDIA card.

The Verdict

The data presents a clear split between measured performance and theoretical capability. The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell has verified benchmark scores and a known position among its peers. The LX ULTRA has no recorded benchmarks, so its real-world performance cannot be confirmed from the database.

Users who require confirmed performance should select the RTX PRO 2000. Its average score of 25,269 is within 2% of the AMD Radeon RX 6700M, the AMD Radeon Pro W5700, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile. It outperforms the NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile by 2%. The card's 70 W power draw and lack of external power connectors make it suitable for systems with limited power delivery. The Blackwell 2.0 architecture includes RT and tensor cores, providing hardware acceleration for ray tracing and AI workloads.

Users who prioritize memory capacity and raw compute specifications should consider the LX ULTRA. Its 24 GB of GDDR6 memory and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth exceed the RTX PRO 2000's 16 GB and 288.0 GB/s. The higher shading unit count, TMU count, and ROP count suggest higher theoretical throughput in compute-heavy tasks. The FP32 performance of 24.58 TFLOPS is 44% higher than the RTX PRO 2000's 17.03 TFLOPS. However, the lack of benchmark data means these specifications have not been verified in testing.

The RTX PRO 2000 is the only card with evidence of performance. The LX ULTRA's specifications are impressive on paper, but the database contains no measurements to confirm how they translate into actual scores. The 225 W power draw and 550 W suggested PSU also impose greater system requirements.

FAQ

Q: Which card has better benchmark performance?

A: Only the NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell has recorded benchmark scores. Its average score is 25,269, placing it in the 70th percentile of all GPUs. The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has no recorded benchmarks, so no comparison is possible.

Q: How does the RTX PRO 2000 compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 6700M is 1.4% ahead with an average score of 25,633. The AMD Radeon Pro W5700 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile are both 1.8% ahead, scoring 25,726 and 25,740 respectively. The NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile is 2% behind with 24,763.

Q: Which card has more memory?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has 24 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 has 16 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit bus.

Q: What are the power requirements for each card?

A: The NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 has a 70 W TDP, requires no power connectors, and suggests a 250 W PSU. The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has a 225 W TDP, uses one 16-pin connector, and suggests a 550 W PSU.

Q: Does either card support ray tracing or tensor operations?

A: The NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 includes 34 RT cores and 136 tensor cores. The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA lists no RT core or tensor core counts in the database.

Q: What are the release dates for these cards?

A: The NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 was released earlier, while the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has a later release date. Both are listed as active in production.

Specification Differences

The two cards differ in every major specification category. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 uses the GB206 chip on a 5 nm process, while the LX ULTRA uses the 7G105 chip on a 6 nm process. The NVIDIA card has 21,900 million transistors on a 181 mm² die; the Lisuan card's transistor count and die size are unknown. The RTX PRO 2000 has 4,352 shading units, 136 TMUs, and 48 ROPs, while the LX ULTRA has 6,144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. The NVIDIA card includes 34 RT cores and 136 tensor cores; the Lisuan card lists none.

Clock speeds show the NVIDIA card at 982 MHz base and 1,957 MHz boost, while the LX ULTRA has no recorded base or boost clocks. Memory configuration differs: 16 GB GDDR7 on a 128-bit bus with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth versus 24 GB GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. The memory clock is 1,125 MHz on the NVIDIA card versus 2,250 MHz on the Lisuan card, both with 18 Gbps effective speed.

Compute rates favor the LX ULTRA: 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 versus 17.03 TFLOPS, 49.15 TFLOPS FP16 versus 17.03 TFLOPS, 192.0 GPixel/s versus 93.94 GPixel/s, and 384.0 GTexel/s versus 266.2 GTexel/s. Power consumption favors the NVIDIA card: 70 W versus 225 W TDP, no power connectors versus one 16-pin connector, and 250 W versus 550 W suggested PSU.

Interface differences include PCIe 5.0 x8 versus PCIe 4.0 x16, and 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1b versus 4x DisplayPort 1.4a. The NVIDIA card supports Vulkan 1.4, while the Lisuan card supports Vulkan 1.3. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. Physical dimensions are 167 mm by 69 mm by 20 mm for the NVIDIA card versus 268 mm by 112 mm by 40 mm for the Lisuan card, both dual-slot. The NVIDIA card has a predecessor in Workstation Ada, while the Lisuan card lists no predecessor.