NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell vs Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 Comparison

Where Each One Wins

The recorded data presents an unusual comparison because the two products occupy different tiers of the benchmark database. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell has a complete set of measured scores across ten tests, while the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 currently has no benchmark entries at all. This means the head-to-head win count is zero for both cards, and any performance conclusions must be drawn from the architectural specifications rather than direct test results.

The NVIDIA card shows a clear strength in standardized workloads. Its average benchmark score sits at 25269, which places it in the 70th percentile of all GPUs in the database. The nearest rivals around this score include the AMD Radeon RX 6700M at 25633 (1.4% higher), the AMD Radeon Pro W5700 at 25726 (1.8% higher), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile at 25740 (1.8% higher). The NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile trails at 24763, meaning the RTX PRO 2000 sits 2% ahead of that mobile workstation card. These deltas are tight, indicating the RTX PRO 2000 competes in a crowded performance band where small percentage differences separate products.

The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has no recorded scores, so its percentile of 50 is a placeholder rather than a measured rank. The database shows zero average benchmark score and no nearest rivals. This makes any discussion of wins for the Lisuan card purely speculative. What the database does reveal is that the LX 7G100 carries substantially higher raw throughput numbers on paper, with an fp32 rating of 24.58 TFLOPS compared to 17.03 TFLOPS for the NVIDIA card. The pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s versus 93.94 GPixel/s and texture rate of 384.0 GTexel/s versus 266.2 GTexel/s all favor the Lisuan part. However, without actual benchmark results, these specifications have not yet been validated in the database.

The practical interpretation is that the NVIDIA card wins in every measured category because it is the only one with measurements. The Lisuan card wins in several specification categories, but those advantages remain unverified by test data. For users who rely on the database for validated performance, the RTX PRO 2000 is the only option with tangible results.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from different architectural lineages. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell uses the GB206 chip built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture, fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC. The die measures 181 mm² with 21,900 million transistors, yielding a transistor density of 121.0 million per square millimeter. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 uses the 7G106 chip with a TrueGPU architecture, also fabricated at TSMC but on a 6 nm process. The database lists the transistor count and die size as unknown for the Lisuan card, with no density figure available.

Core configuration differs significantly. The NVIDIA card has 4352 shading units, 136 texture mapping units, 48 raster operation units, 34 ray tracing cores, and 136 tensor cores. The Lisuan card has 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs, but the database records no ray tracing cores and no tensor cores for this product. This is a notable divergence: the NVIDIA architecture includes dedicated hardware for both ray tracing and tensor operations, while the Lisuan architecture does not list either in the database. The TrueGPU naming suggests a different design philosophy, but the absence of RT and tensor core counts leaves those capabilities undocumented.

Clock behavior also differs. The NVIDIA card has explicit base and boost clocks of 982 MHz and 1957 MHz respectively. The Lisuan card has no base or boost clock values recorded. Memory clocks are similar in effective data rate: both run at 18 Gbps effective. The NVIDIA memory clock is listed as 1125 MHz, while the Lisuan card lists 2250 MHz, but the effective 18 Gbps figure is identical for both.

Memory subsystems take different approaches. The NVIDIA card uses 16 GB of GDDR7 on a 128-bit bus, delivering 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The Lisuan card uses 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, delivering 432.0 GB/s. The Lisuan card has a wider bus and higher bandwidth despite having less total memory. The NVIDIA card has more capacity but a narrower pipeline. The fp16 compute rates also differ: the NVIDIA card achieves 17.03 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio to fp32, while the Lisuan card reaches 49.15 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio, indicating half-precision throughput is doubled relative to single-precision.

The Verdict

The data supports a straightforward conclusion for the NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell: it is the only card in this comparison with validated benchmark scores. The database shows it performing at the 70th percentile among all GPUs, with an average score of 25269 and competitive positioning against established AMD and NVIDIA parts. For anyone requiring measured performance data, this card delivers.

The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 presents a specification sheet that is numerically stronger in several raw throughput categories, including fp32 compute, pixel fill rate, texture fill rate, and memory bandwidth. It also uses a wider 192-bit memory bus and carries a higher TDP of 225 W versus 70 W for the NVIDIA card. However, the complete absence of benchmark scores in the database means there is no evidence that those specifications translate into real-world performance. The percentile of 50 is not a measured rank; it is the default value for a card with no data.

From the recorded information, the NVIDIA card wins on validation and efficiency. It offers a lower power draw of 70 W, no external power connectors, a suggested power supply of 250 W, and a compact 167 mm length. The Lisuan card requires a 225 W power draw, one 8-pin connector, a 550 W suggested power supply, and measures 294 mm in length. The NVIDIA card also uses a newer PCIe 5.0 x8 interface compared to the PCIe 4.0 x16 on the Lisuan card, and it supports DisplayPort 2.1b outputs versus DisplayPort 1.4a. The Lisuan card supports Vulkan 1.3 while the NVIDIA card supports Vulkan 1.4.

The verdict from the data is that the NVIDIA card is the usable, measured product. The Lisuan card remains an unverified entry with promising specifications but no test results to confirm them.

FAQ

Q: Which card has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell has an average benchmark score of 25269. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has an average benchmark score of 0 because no benchmarks are recorded for it.

Q: How does the NVIDIA card compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell sits 1.4% below the AMD Radeon RX 6700M, 1.8% below the AMD Radeon Pro W5700 and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile, and 2% above the NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile.

Q: What memory configurations do the two cards use?

A: The NVIDIA card uses 16 GB of GDDR7 on a 128-bit bus with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Lisuan card uses 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Do both cards support ray tracing and tensor operations?

A: The NVIDIA card lists 34 ray tracing cores and 136 tensor cores. The Lisuan card has no ray tracing core or tensor core counts recorded in the database.

Q: What are the power requirements for each card?

A: The NVIDIA card has a TDP of 70 W, uses no external power connectors, and requires a 250 W suggested power supply. The Lisuan card has a TDP of 225 W, uses one 8-pin connector, and requires a 550 W suggested power supply.

Q: Which card has a higher fp32 compute rating?

A: The Lisuan card is rated at 24.58 TFLOPS fp32, while the NVIDIA card is rated at 17.03 TFLOPS fp32.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

Direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons are impossible because the database contains no test scores for the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100. The head-to-head benchmark array is empty, and the win counts for both cards are zero. The only measured data comes from the NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell.

The NVIDIA card's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 2374.5. In Geekbench, it records 106087 for OpenCL and 113865 for Vulkan. Passmark results show a G3D score of 20049, a G2D score of 1303, and a GPU compute score of 8396. Legacy DirectX tests in Passmark show 122 for DirectX 10, 174 for DirectX 11, 80 for DirectX 12, and 241 for DirectX 9. These ten scores combine into the average of 25269.

The specification comparison provides the only basis for projecting how the Lisuan card might perform. Its fp32 rating of 24.58 TFLOPS is 44% higher than the NVIDIA card's 17.03 TFLOPS. The pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s is more than double the NVIDIA's 93.94 GPixel/s. The texture rate of 384.0 GTexel/s exceeds the NVIDIA's 266.2 GTexel/s by roughly 44%. Memory bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s is 50% higher than the NVIDIA's 288.0 GB/s. These are substantial theoretical advantages, but the database has no evidence to confirm they produce higher actual scores.

The NVIDIA card counters with architectural features that the Lisuan card does not list: tensor cores and ray tracing cores. The NVIDIA card also has a higher memory capacity of 16 GB versus 12 GB, though at lower bandwidth. The NVIDIA card's 70 W power draw is dramatically lower than the Lisuan's 225 W, suggesting better efficiency per watt, though no efficiency metric is directly recorded.

Specification Differences

The two cards differ across nearly every major specification field. The process nodes differ: NVIDIA uses 5 nm while Lisuan uses 6 nm, both at TSMC. The NVIDIA chip is the GB206 with the Blackwell 2.0 architecture, while the Lisuan chip is the 7G106 with the TrueGPU architecture. The NVIDIA generation is listed as Blackwell PRO W (x000), while the Lisuan generation is 7G100.

Compute resources diverge sharply. The NVIDIA card has 4352 shading units, 136 TMUs, and 48 ROPs. The Lisuan card has 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. The NVIDIA card is the only one with recorded ray tracing cores (34) and tensor cores (136). The Lisuan card has no entries for either. The NVIDIA fp32 is 17.03 TFLOPS; the Lisuan fp32 is 24.58 TFLOPS. The NVIDIA fp16 is 17.03 TFLOPS at a 1:1 ratio; the Lisuan fp16 is 49.15 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio.

Memory specifications differ in capacity, type, bus width, and bandwidth. The NVIDIA card uses 16 GB of GDDR7 on a 128-bit bus with 288.0 GB/s. The Lisuan card uses 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s. Both run at 18 Gbps effective memory speed.

Power and physical specifications show the NVIDIA card as the more compact and efficient option. The NVIDIA TDP is 70 W with no power connectors and a 250 W suggested PSU. The Lisuan TDP is 225 W with one 8-pin connector and a 550 W suggested PSU. The NVIDIA card is 167 mm long, 69 mm high, and 20 mm wide. The Lisuan card is 294 mm long, 120 mm high, and 49 mm wide. Both are dual-slot cards.

Interface support differs. The NVIDIA card uses PCIe 5.0 x8 and 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1b outputs. The Lisuan card uses PCIe 4.0 x16 and 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The NVIDIA card supports Vulkan 1.4, while the Lisuan card supports Vulkan 1.3. Production status is Active for both. The NVIDIA release date is 2025-08-10, and the Lisuan release date is 2026-06-17. Neither card has a recorded launch MSRP.