GPU Comparison

Intel
GPU

Intel Arc A370M

CORE STATE DG2-128
VRAM 4 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2050 MHz
TDP 35 W
BUS WIDTH 64 bit
ARCHITECTURE Xe-HPG
nm
PROCESS 6 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2022
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

RTX A6000

CORE STATE GA102
VRAM 48 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1800 MHz
TDP 300 W
BUS WIDTH 384 bit
ARCHITECTURE Ampere
nm
PROCESS 8 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2020

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

geekbench_opencl
29,676
193,937
geekbench_vulkan
28,673
164,462
passmark_directx_10
N/A
155
passmark_directx_11
N/A
191
passmark_directx_12
N/A
87
passmark_directx_9
N/A
245
passmark_g2d
N/A
913
passmark_g3d
N/A
22,577
passmark_gpu_compute
N/A
14,110

Analysis: Intel Arc A370M vs NVIDIA RTX A6000

Rendering performance benchmarks between NVIDIA RTX A6000 by NVIDIA and Intel Arc A370M GPU indicate a definite champion. NVIDIA RTX A6000 by NVIDIA achieves significantly higher performance over modern games. The video memory edge and architectural upgrades convert into visibly better gaming results. Score numbers confirms this assessment. Gamers looking for top-tier performance will take note.

The video memory benefit of NVIDIA RTX A6000 by NVIDIA becomes particularly important at higher detail settings. High resolution rendering consumes notable VRAM, and NVIDIA RTX A6000 by NVIDIA has extra capability. This converts into enhanced frame rates in VRAM-hungry titles. Future software will progressively demand additional graphics memory. This edge expands over time.

Game performance performance in different games reliably favor NVIDIA RTX A6000 by NVIDIA. Whether it's multiplayer games to AAA games, NVIDIA RTX A6000 by NVIDIA maintains its lead. The frame rate reliability in diverse scenarios indicates inherent technical superiority. Gamers will rely on strong performance independent of scenario. This flexibility is notable.

For people facing a buying decision, NVIDIA RTX A6000 by NVIDIA stands as the suggested selection. The consistent benchmark lead over Intel Arc A370M GPU renders it the smarter choice for gaming-focused consumers. Factor in your individual requirements, but the benchmarks directs toward NVIDIA RTX A6000 by NVIDIA. Base an wise decision. This performance gap is measurable and substantial.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
A370M
RTX A6000
Core Specs
Shading Units
1,024
10,752 +950.0%
Shaders
1,024
10,752 +950.0%
TMUs
64
336 +425.0%
ROPs
32
112 +250.0%
SM Count
84
Execution Units
128
Clocks
Base Clock
1550 MHz
1410 MHz
Boost Clock
2050 MHz
1800 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz 14 Gbps effective
2000 MHz 16 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
4 GB
48 GB
VRAM (MB)
4,096
49,152 +1100.0%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory Bus
64 bit
384 bit
Bandwidth
112.0 GB/s
768.0 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
4 MB
6 MB
Performance
Pixel Rate
65.60 GPixel/s
201.6 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
131.2 GTexel/s
604.8 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
4.198 TFLOPS
38.71 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
1,049.6 GFLOPS (1:4)
604.8 GFLOPS (1:64)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
8.397 TFLOPS (2:1)
38.71 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
8
84 +950.0%
Tensor Cores
336
XMX Cores
128
Power
TDP
35 W
300 W
TDP (W)
35
300 +757.1%
Suggested PSU
700 W
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Architecture
Architecture
Xe-HPG
Ampere
GPU Name
DG2-128
GA102
Generation
Alchemist (Arc 3 Mobile)
Workstation Ampere (Ax000)
Process Size
6 nm
8 nm
Transistors
7,200 million
28,300 million
Die Size
157 mm²
628 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
Samsung
Density
45.9M / mm²
45.1M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
3.0
3.0
CUDA
8.6
Shader Model
6.6
6.8
Physical
Slot Width
IGP
Dual-slot
Length
267 mm 10.5 inches
Height
112 mm 4.4 inches
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
PCIe 4.0 x16
Other
Launch Price
4,649 USD
Production
End-of-life
End-of-life
Predecessor
Quadro Turing
Successor
Workstation Ada
View Arc A370M Details View RTX A6000 Details