AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT vs Intel Arc A370M Comparison

AMD
RADEON

AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT

CORE STATE Navi 22
VRAM 12 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2600 MHz
TDP 250 W
BUS WIDTH 192 bit
ARCHITECTURE RDNA 2.0
nm
PROCESS 7 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2022
VS
Intel
GPU

Arc A370M

CORE STATE DG2-128
VRAM 4 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2050 MHz
TDP 35 W
BUS WIDTH 64 bit
ARCHITECTURE Xe-HPG
nm
PROCESS 6 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2022

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
2,548
N/A
geekbench_metal
137,249
N/A
geekbench_opencl
16,360
29,676
geekbench_vulkan
98,089
28,673
passmark_directx_10
125
N/A
passmark_directx_11
180
N/A
passmark_directx_12
80
N/A
passmark_directx_9
263
N/A
passmark_g2d
972
N/A
passmark_g3d
20,700
N/A
passmark_gpu_compute
9,550
N/A

Analysis: AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT vs Intel Arc A370M

# Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database record for the Intel Arc A370M and the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT includes two head-to-head benchmark comparisons. These are direct measurements from the recorded tests, not estimates. The first test is Geekbench OpenCL. The Intel Arc A370M scores 29,676 points, while the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT scores 16,360 points. That is a massive 81.4% advantage for the Intel part in this specific workload. The margin is huge and consistent with the Intel part's general compute-oriented design. The second recorded comparison is Geekbench Vulkan, and here the situation reverses completely. The AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT scores 98,089 points, while the Intel Arc A370M scores 28,673 points. The AMD part leads by 70.8% in this test. The Vulkan result shows a pattern where the AMD architecture delivers significantly higher throughput in this particular graphics API workload.

The benchmark scorecard gives one win to each part. The Intel Arc A370M wins one test, the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT wins the other. The data shows that neither part is universally faster. The Intel part has a substantial lead in OpenCL compute workloads, while the AMD part has a decisive advantage in Vulkan graphics workloads. The split result means that the choice between these two parts depends entirely on the application and API environment.

FAQ

Q: How do these two GPUs compare in raw compute performance?

A: The recorded average benchmark score for the Intel Arc A370M is 29,175, and for the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT it is 26,011. The Intel part has a 12.2% higher average score across the two recorded tests. However, this average is heavily influenced by the OpenCL result, where the Intel part has a very large lead. In the Vulkan workload, the AMD part leads by a large margin.

Q: What is the best use case for the Intel Arc A370M?

A: The benchmark data shows the Intel Arc A370M dominating in Geekbench OpenCL compute workloads, with an 81.4% lead over the AMD RX 6750 XT in that particular test. Its lower power envelope and integrated form factor make it suitable for systems where compute-heavy tasks in OpenCL are the primary focus.

Q: When should I choose the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT?

A: The RX 6750 XT shows a clear advantage in the Geekbench Vulkan test, where it beats the Intel Arc by 70.8%. This makes it the better choice for graphics workloads that leverage the Vulkan API. It also has a much larger memory pool and a wider memory bus, which helps in high-resolution texture workloads.

Q: How big is the performance gap in the recorded tests?

A: In the Geekbench OpenCL test, the Intel Arc A370M records 29,676 versus the AMD RX 6750 XT's 16,360, a difference of 81.4% in favor of Intel. In the Geekbench Vulkan test, the AMD RX 6750 XT records 98,089 versus the Intel's 28,673, a difference of 70.8% in favor of AMD.

Q: Which part has the advantage in the Geekbench Vulkan test?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT wins the Geekbench Vulkan test by a significant 70.8% margin. The Intel Arc A370M is slower in this specific API workload.

Architecture Differences

The Intel Arc A370M uses the Xe-HPG architecture and the DG2-128 chip. It is built on a 6 nm process at TSMC and packs 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die. That works out to a transistor density of 45.9 million per square millimeter. The AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT is built on the RDNA 2.0 architecture with the Navi 22 chip. It uses a 7 nm process at TSMC and has 17,200 million transistors on a 335 mm² die, which gives a density of 51.3 million per square millimeter. The AMD chip has a higher transistor density, and the Intel chip has a smaller die size.

The Intel Arc has 1,024 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, 32 ROPs, and 8 ray tracing cores. The AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT has 2,560 shading units, 160 texture units, 64 ROPs, and 40 ray tracing cores. The AMD part has substantially more shading units and texture units, a full 2.5 times as many shading units and 2.5 times as many texture units. The AMD also has twice the ROPs. The Intel Arc has no tensor cores, and the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT also has no tensor cores.

The memory configuration is a major difference. The Intel Arc A370M comes with 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus. Memory bandwidth is 112.0 GB/s. The AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT comes with 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, providing 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The AMD has three times the memory capacity and nearly four times the memory bandwidth. The Intel part uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, while the AMD uses PCIe 4.0 x16. Display outputs on the Intel are portable device dependent, while the AMD has 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a.

Clock speeds differ. The Intel Arc A370M base clock is 1550 MHz with a boost clock of 2050 MHz. Its memory clock is 1750 MHz, which yields 14 Gbps effective. The AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT has a base clock of 2150 MHz, a game clock of 2495 MHz, and a boost clock of 2600 MHz. Its memory clock is 2250 MHz, which gives 18 Gbps effective.

Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The Intel adds no DirectX version higher than 12_2, and AMD also supports DirectX 12 Ultimate.

Specification Differences

The two parts differ in several key specifications. The Intel Arc A370M has a base clock of 1550 MHz, a boost clock of 2050 MHz, and a memory clock of 1750 MHz. The AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT has a much higher base clock of 2150 MHz, a boost clock of 2600 MHz, and a game clock of 2495 MHz. Its memory clock is 2250 MHz.

The memory subsystem is the biggest gap. The Intel part has 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 112.0 GB/s. The AMD has 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s. That is 3 times the memory capacity and nearly 4 times the memory bandwidth for the AMD.

Compute units also differ heavily. The Intel Arc A370M has 1,024 shading units, 64 texture units, 32 ROPs, and 8 ray tracing cores. The AMD RX 6750 XT has 2,560 shading units, 160 texture units, 64 ROPs, and 40 ray tracing cores.

The AMD part has a higher transistor density at 51.3M per mm² compared to the Intel's 45.9M per mm². The process nodes are 7 nm for AMD and 6 nm for Intel.

The power profile is completely different. The Intel Arc A370M has a 35 W TDP, while the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT has a 250 W TDP. The AMD card is dual-slot wide, while the Intel is a mobile IGP. The AMD suggests a 600 W PSU, with 1x 6-pin and 1x 8-pin power connectors. The Intel has no power connectors listed.

The AMD is listed as end-of-life, while the Intel Arc is also listed as end-of-life. The AMD release date is 2022-03-02, the Intel release date is 2022-03-29.

The Verdict

From the data, the choice is workload-dependent. The Intel Arc A370M is the part to pick for OpenCL compute workloads. Its Geekbench OpenCL score of 29,676 is 81.4% above the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT, and its average benchmark score is 12.2% higher. If the primary usage is Vulkan graphics, the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT is the better option, with a 70.8% lead in the Geekbench Vulkan test. The AMD also has a larger memory pool and higher bandwidth, and more shading units, texture units, ROPs, and ray tracing cores. The Intel Arc has a much lower power envelope (35 W vs. 250 W), which is a strong consideration for mobile or power-limited builds.

The data supports one clear conclusion: there is no single winner. The Intel Arc A370M wins the compute-oriented OpenCL benchmark by a wide margin. The AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT wins the Vulkan graphics benchmark by a huge margin. The rest of the hardware differences line up with these results: the AMD has double the compute resources and much more memory bandwidth, while the Intel has a much smaller power envelope. The buyer should decide based on which API and workload dominates their use case.

Where Each One Wins

Pick the Intel Arc A370M if: The target workload is OpenCL compute, or the task is run in a power-constrained mobile chassis. The data shows a 81.4% lead over the AMD in Geekbench OpenCL, and its 35 W power envelope is a fraction of the AMD's 250 W. Its smaller die (157 mm² versus 335 mm²) and lower transistor count (7,200 million versus 17,200 million) also fit a more integrated system.

Pick the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT if: The target workload uses Vulkan. The lead in Geekbench Vulkan is 70.8% and it has a much larger memory pool, 12 GB versus 4 GB, and 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth versus 112.0 GB/s. It has 2.5 times more shading units, 2.5 times more texture units, 2 times the ROPs, and 5 times the ray tracing cores. The 40 ray tracing cores give it a distinct advantage in future ray-traced rendering workloads. It also has a slightly higher transistor density 51.3M/mm² versus 45.9M/mm².

The data makes the decision easy: compute-heavy OpenCL tasks go to the Intel Arc A370M, while Vulkan or memory-heavy GPU tasks go to the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
RX 6750 XT
A370M
Core Specs
Shading Units
2,560
1,024 -60.0%
Shaders
2,560
1,024 -60.0%
TMUs
160
64 -60.0%
ROPs
64
32 -50.0%
Compute Units
40
Execution Units
128
Clocks
Base Clock
2150 MHz
1550 MHz
Boost Clock
2600 MHz
2050 MHz
Game Clock
2495 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz 18 Gbps effective
1750 MHz 14 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
12 GB
4 GB
VRAM (MB)
12,288
4,096 -66.7%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory Bus
192 bit
64 bit
Bandwidth
432.0 GB/s
112.0 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
L2 Cache
3 MB
4 MB
L3 Cache
96 MB
L0 Cache
32 KB per WGP
Performance
Pixel Rate
166.4 GPixel/s
65.60 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
416.0 GTexel/s
131.2 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
13.31 TFLOPS
4.198 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
832.0 GFLOPS (1:16)
1,049.6 GFLOPS (1:4)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
26.62 TFLOPS (2:1)
8.397 TFLOPS (2:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
40
8 -80.0%
XMX Cores
128
Power
TDP
250 W
35 W
TDP (W)
250
35 -86.0%
Suggested PSU
600 W
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Architecture
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
Xe-HPG
GPU Name
Navi 22
DG2-128
Generation
Navi II (RX 6000)
Alchemist (Arc 3 Mobile)
Process Size
7 nm
6 nm
Transistors
17,200 million
7,200 million
Die Size
335 mm²
157 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
TSMC
Density
51.3M / mm²
45.9M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
2.1
3.0
Shader Model
6.8
6.6
Physical
Slot Width
Dual-slot
IGP
Length
267 mm 10.5 inches
Height
110 mm 4.3 inches
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 1.4a
Portable Device Dependent
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
PCIe 4.0 x8
Other
Launch Price
549 USD
Production
End-of-life
End-of-life
Predecessor
Navi
Successor
Navi III
View Radeon RX 6750 XT Details View Arc A370M Details