GPU Comparison

Intel
GPU

Intel Arc A350M

CORE STATE DG2-128
VRAM 4 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2200 MHz
TDP 25 W
BUS WIDTH 64 bit
ARCHITECTURE Xe-HPG
nm
PROCESS 6 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2022
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

RTX A6000

CORE STATE GA102
VRAM 48 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1800 MHz
TDP 300 W
BUS WIDTH 384 bit
ARCHITECTURE Ampere
nm
PROCESS 8 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2020

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

geekbench_opencl
24,546
193,937
geekbench_vulkan
24,747
164,462
passmark_directx_10
N/A
155
passmark_directx_11
N/A
191
passmark_directx_12
N/A
87
passmark_directx_9
N/A
245
passmark_g2d
N/A
913
passmark_g3d
N/A
22,577
passmark_gpu_compute
N/A
14,110

Analysis: Intel Arc A350M vs NVIDIA RTX A6000

Visual performance comparisons between Radeon NVIDIA RTX A6000 and Intel Arc A350M show a clear leader. Radeon NVIDIA RTX A6000 provides significantly better frame rates throughout recent games. The graphics memory edge and engineering improvements result into visibly smoother gaming experiences. Score results confirms this observation. Users looking for maximum performance would pay attention.

When it comes to real-time ray tracing, Radeon NVIDIA RTX A6000 moves considerably beyond of Intel Arc A350M. The RT cores manage heavy lighting rendering significantly more efficiently. Users wanting modern fidelity might seriously favor Radeon NVIDIA RTX A6000. This ray tracing advantage is considerable. Next-gen titles more and more utilize RT technology.

Intel Arc A350M faces challenges to compete with Radeon NVIDIA RTX A6000's sheer power. In cost-sensitive buyers, Intel Arc A350M could yet offer reasonable results, yet those needing maximum performance should invest toward Radeon NVIDIA RTX A6000. This frame rate difference is too notable to deny. Heavy scenarios specifically highlight this gap. The cost difference returns dividends in frame rates.

To summarize, Radeon NVIDIA RTX A6000 delivers the more capable option in this comparison. The frame rate leads justify examination for buyers constructing a high-performance rendering build. While Intel Arc A350M offers its strengths, this test figures clearly supports Radeon NVIDIA RTX A6000. Base your decision based on this. This performance delta is notable enough to impact.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
A350M
RTX A6000
Core Specs
Shading Units
768
10,752 +1300.0%
Shaders
768
10,752 +1300.0%
TMUs
48
336 +600.0%
ROPs
24
112 +366.7%
SM Count
84
Execution Units
96
Clocks
Base Clock
1150 MHz
1410 MHz
Boost Clock
2200 MHz
1800 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz 14 Gbps effective
2000 MHz 16 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
4 GB
48 GB
VRAM (MB)
4,096
49,152 +1100.0%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory Bus
64 bit
384 bit
Bandwidth
112.0 GB/s
768.0 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
4 MB
6 MB
Performance
Pixel Rate
52.80 GPixel/s
201.6 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
105.6 GTexel/s
604.8 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
3.379 TFLOPS
38.71 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
844.8 GFLOPS (1:4)
604.8 GFLOPS (1:64)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
6.758 TFLOPS (2:1)
38.71 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
6
84 +1300.0%
Tensor Cores
336
XMX Cores
96
Power
TDP
25 W
300 W
TDP (W)
25
300 +1100.0%
Suggested PSU
700 W
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Architecture
Architecture
Xe-HPG
Ampere
GPU Name
DG2-128
GA102
Generation
Alchemist (Arc 3 Mobile)
Workstation Ampere (Ax000)
Process Size
6 nm
8 nm
Transistors
7,200 million
28,300 million
Die Size
157 mm²
628 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
Samsung
Density
45.9M / mm²
45.1M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
3.0
3.0
CUDA
8.6
Shader Model
6.6
6.8
Physical
Slot Width
IGP
Dual-slot
Length
267 mm 10.5 inches
Height
112 mm 4.4 inches
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
PCIe 4.0 x16
Other
Launch Price
4,649 USD
Production
End-of-life
End-of-life
Predecessor
Quadro Turing
Successor
Workstation Ada
View Arc A350M Details View RTX A6000 Details