GPU Comparison

AMD
RADEON

AMD Radeon RX 6400

CORE STATE Navi 24
VRAM 4 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2321 MHz
TDP 53 W
BUS WIDTH 64 bit
ARCHITECTURE RDNA 2.0
nm
PROCESS 6 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2022
VS
Intel
GPU

Arc A350M

CORE STATE DG2-128
VRAM 4 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2200 MHz
TDP 25 W
BUS WIDTH 64 bit
ARCHITECTURE Xe-HPG
nm
PROCESS 6 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2022

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
176
N/A
geekbench_opencl
32,011
24,546
geekbench_vulkan
16,372
24,747
passmark_directx_10
54
N/A
passmark_directx_11
70
N/A
passmark_directx_12
30
N/A
passmark_directx_9
93
N/A
passmark_g2d
722
N/A
passmark_g3d
7,673
N/A
passmark_gpu_compute
2,812
N/A

Analysis: AMD Radeon RX 6400 vs Intel Arc A350M

Reviewing the test figures for AMD RX 6400 GPU and Intel's Arc A350M graphics, a clear pattern appears. AMD RX 6400 GPU reliably achieves higher scores in this benchmarking. This speed superiority ranges from substantial to outstanding based on the individual game. This steadiness attests to inherent engineering benefits. Consumers prioritizing rendering performance would take note.

Game performance tests over different titles reliably favor AMD RX 6400 GPU. Whether it's competitive scenarios to blockbuster titles, AMD RX 6400 GPU maintains its advantage. The gaming dependability across various scenarios shows inherent architectural advantages. Players will rely on capable experiences independent of scenario. The adaptability is impressive.

When it comes to ray tracing, AMD RX 6400 GPU jumps considerably forward of Intel's Arc A350M graphics. Its dedicated cores execute intensive global illumination computations more effectively. Players wanting next-gen visuals might strongly consider AMD RX 6400 GPU. The ray tracing advantage is substantial. Contemporary titles more and more utilize ray tracing features.

All things considered, AMD RX 6400 GPU represents the stronger choice in this analysis. The benchmark advantages justify examination for users building a high-performance visual PC. Even though Intel's Arc A350M graphics has its positives, this test results clearly advantages AMD RX 6400 GPU. Reach your selection accordingly. This benchmark margin is substantial sufficiently to affect.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
RX 6400
A350M
Core Specs
Shading Units
768
768 0.0%
Shaders
768
768 0.0%
TMUs
48
48 0.0%
ROPs
32
24 -25.0%
Compute Units
12
Execution Units
96
Clocks
Base Clock
1923 MHz
1150 MHz
Boost Clock
2321 MHz
2200 MHz
Game Clock
2039 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz 16 Gbps effective
1750 MHz 14 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
4 GB
4 GB
VRAM (MB)
4,096
4,096 0.0%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory Bus
64 bit
64 bit
Bandwidth
128.0 GB/s
112.0 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
L2 Cache
1024 KB
4 MB
L3 Cache
16 MB
L0 Cache
32 KB per WGP
Performance
Pixel Rate
74.27 GPixel/s
52.80 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
111.4 GTexel/s
105.6 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
3.565 TFLOPS
3.379 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
222.8 GFLOPS (1:16)
844.8 GFLOPS (1:4)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
7.130 TFLOPS (2:1)
6.758 TFLOPS (2:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
12
6 -50.0%
XMX Cores
96
Power
TDP
53 W
25 W
TDP (W)
53
25 -52.8%
Suggested PSU
250 W
Power Connectors
None
Architecture
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
Xe-HPG
GPU Name
Navi 24
DG2-128
Generation
Navi II (RX 6000)
Alchemist (Arc 3 Mobile)
Process Size
6 nm
6 nm
Transistors
5,400 million
7,200 million
Die Size
107 mm²
157 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
TSMC
Density
50.5M / mm²
45.9M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
2.2
3.0
Shader Model
6.8
6.6
Physical
Slot Width
Single-slot
IGP
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.11x DisplayPort 1.4a
Portable Device Dependent
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4
PCIe 4.0 x8
Other
Launch Price
159 USD
Production
End-of-life
End-of-life
Predecessor
Navi
Successor
Navi III
View Radeon RX 6400 Details View Arc A350M Details