NVIDIA RTX A1000 vs Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 Comparison

The Verdict

The database comparison between the NVIDIA RTX A1000 and the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 presents a clear divide in intended use cases, though the benchmark data is incomplete on one side. The RTX A1000 has recorded benchmark scores across three tests, yielding an average score of 34207 and a percentile ranking of 79 among all GPUs. The LX 7G100, by contrast, has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, an average score of 0, and a percentile ranking of 50. This absence of measured data for the LX 7G100 means direct numerical comparison is impossible for actual application performance.

Based on the recorded specifications, the RTX A1000 is positioned for low-power workstation environments where thermal and space constraints dominate. Its 50 W power draw, single-slot design, and 163 mm length make it suitable for compact systems. The LX 7G100 targets a different segment entirely, with a 225 W power draw, dual-slot width, and 294 mm length. It requires a more substantial power delivery setup, including a single 8-pin connector and a 550 W suggested power supply.

The choice between these two cards depends on whether the user prioritizes measured, verified performance or raw specification headroom. For users needing proven performance in a constrained chassis, the RTX A1000 has the data to support its selection. For users who require the higher theoretical throughput and larger memory pool of the LX 7G100, the lack of benchmark results means relying on specification-derived expectations rather than confirmed measurements.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX A1000 wins in every recorded benchmark category, but this is because the LX 7G100 has no entries in the benchmark database. The three measured tests for the RTX A1000 are 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 with a score of 969, Geekbench OpenCL with 52078, and Geekbench Vulkan with 49574. These scores place it slightly ahead of or near several comparable GPUs, with a 0.2% advantage over the NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB, a 0.2% advantage over the AMD Radeon RX 560 XT, a 0.6% advantage over the AMD Radeon RX 480, and a 0.4% deficit relative to the NVIDIA TITAN V.

The LX 7G100 wins on specification grounds across multiple categories. Its 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 throughput is approximately 3.65 times the RTX A1000's 6.737 TFLOPS. Its memory bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s is 2.25 times the RTX A1000's 192.0 GB/s. The 12 GB memory capacity exceeds the RTX A1000's 8 GB by 50%. The 6144 shading units represent 2.67 times the RTX A1000's 2304 shading units. The texture rate of 384.0 GTexel/s is 3.65 times the RTX A1000's 105.3 GTexel/s, and the pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s is 4.10 times the RTX A1000's 46.78 GPixel/s.

For FP16 workloads, the divergence widens. The LX 7G100 achieves 49.15 TFLOPS with a 2:1 FP16 to FP32 ratio, while the RTX A1000 delivers 6.737 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio. The LX 7G100 thus offers 7.29 times the FP16 throughput of the RTX A1000.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs derive from different architectural lineages. The RTX A1000 uses NVIDIA's GA107 chip built on the Ampere architecture, fabricated on Samsung's 8 nm process. The die measures 200 mm² and contains 8,700 million transistors, yielding a transistor density of 43.5 million per square millimeter. The LX 7G100 uses the 7G106 chip on an architecture designated as TrueGPU, fabricated on TSMC's 6 nm process. Its transistor count and die size are not recorded in the database.

Memory subsystems differ substantially. The RTX A1000 has 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, with memory clocked at 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) and bandwidth of 192.0 GB/s. The LX 7G100 has 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, with memory at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) and bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s. The larger bus and higher memory clock combine to produce the LX 7G100's bandwidth advantage.

Compute resources scale similarly. The RTX A1000 carries 2304 shading units, 72 texture mapping units, and 32 render output units. It also includes 18 ray tracing cores and 72 tensor cores. The LX 7G100 has 6144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 96 render output units, but no ray tracing or tensor core counts are recorded in the database.

API support shows minor differences. Both cards support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The RTX A1000 supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX 7G100 supports Vulkan 1.3. Display outputs differ in connector type: the RTX A1000 provides four mini-DisplayPort 1.4a outputs, while the LX 7G100 provides four full-size DisplayPort 1.4a outputs.

Physical and power specifications separate the two clearly. The RTX A1000 draws 50 W, has a single-slot width, requires no power connectors, and fits within a 163 mm length and 69 mm height. The LX 7G100 draws 225 W, occupies a dual-slot width, requires one 8-pin power connector, and measures 294 mm in length, 120 mm in height, and 49 mm in width. The bus interface also differs: the RTX A1000 uses PCIe 4.0 x8, while the LX 7G100 uses PCIe 4.0 x16.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher raw FP32 compute throughput?

A: The LX 7G100 delivers 24.58 TFLOPS FP32, which is approximately 3.65 times the RTX A1000's 6.737 TFLOPS.

Q: How do their memory bandwidth figures compare?

A: The LX 7G100 offers 432.0 GB/s, which is 2.25 times the RTX A1000's 192.0 GB/s.

Q: What is the power consumption difference?

A: The RTX A1000 draws 50 W, while the LX 7G100 draws 225 W. The suggested power supply ratings are 250 W and 550 W respectively.

Q: Which GPU has more memory capacity?

A: The LX 7G100 has 12 GB of GDDR6, while the RTX A1000 has 8 GB of GDDR6.

Q: Are there any recorded benchmark scores for the LX 7G100?

A: No. The database lists no benchmark results for the LX 7G100, giving it an average score of 0 and a percentile ranking of 50. The RTX A1000 has three recorded scores and a percentile ranking of 79.

Q: Do these GPUs support the same graphics APIs?

A: Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The RTX A1000 supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX 7G100 supports Vulkan 1.3.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head benchmark table contains no entries, and the wins counter shows 0 for both cards. This means there is no directly comparable measured performance data between the RTX A1000 and the LX 7G100 in the database. The only available benchmark scores belong to the RTX A1000.

The RTX A1000's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 969 represents its performance in a modern DirectX 12 workload. Its Geekbench OpenCL score of 52078 and Geekbench Vulkan score of 49574 provide cross-API compute measurements. These scores contribute to its average benchmark score of 34207, which places it at the 79th percentile among all GPUs in the database.

Relative to its nearest rivals, the RTX A1000's average score is 0.2% above the NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB (score 34154), 0.2% above the AMD Radeon RX 560 XT (score 34133), 0.6% above the AMD Radeon RX 480 (score 33997), and 0.4% below the NVIDIA TITAN V (score 34355). These deltas are small, indicating that the RTX A1000 sits in a tightly clustered performance band around the 34000 to 34400 average score range.

Without benchmark data for the LX 7G100, its performance cannot be positioned against the RTX A1000 or any other GPU using measured results. The specification sheet suggests significantly higher throughput, but the database cannot confirm this with recorded scores. The RTX A1000's measured performance, while modest in absolute terms, is verified and places it in the upper quartile of all GPUs tracked in the database.

The absence of LX 7G100 benchmark entries also means its percentile ranking of 50 is not derived from actual performance measurements. This ranking should be interpreted with caution, as it does not reflect verified application performance. The RTX A1000's percentile of 79, by contrast, is grounded in three separate benchmark measurements.