NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER vs NVIDIA RTX 6000D Comparison

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER and the NVIDIA RTX 6000D are both active Blackwell 2.0 designs from NVIDIA, but they target different segments of the market. The recorded data shows a clear split: the GeForce card wins the single 3DMark Steel Nomad test by a wide margin, while the RTX 6000D leads in the broader compute-oriented benchmark and sits at the 98th percentile across all GPUs, compared to the GeForce card’s 36th percentile. This page analyzes the benchmark results, architectural differences, and specification gaps between the two, relying solely on the database entries.

Where Each One Wins

The benchmark results indicate a stark division in strengths. In the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, the GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER scores 6269.5 points, while the RTX 6000D scores 3522 points. That represents a 78% advantage for the GeForce card, making it the clear winner in this specific gaming-oriented workload. The GeForce card’s average benchmark score, based on this single recorded test, is 6270, and it holds a 36th percentile ranking across all GPUs. Its nearest rivals in this metric include the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 with an identical average score (0% delta), the AMD FirePro W600 at 6223 (0.8% behind), and the AMD Radeon R7 M350 at 6327 (0.9% ahead). The GeForce card effectively matches the 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 in this test, while staying within a single percentage point of the other two rivals.

The RTX 6000D, conversely, excels in the Geekbench OpenCL test, where it records a score of 388405. That test is not present in the GeForce card’s benchmark list, so no direct head-to-head comparison exists for that workload. However, the RTX 6000D’s average benchmark score across its two recorded tests (Steel Nomad and OpenCL) is 195964, which places it at the 98th percentile. Its nearest rivals are all professional or data-center cards: the NVIDIA Tesla V100S PCIe 32 GB (0.8% behind), the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 40 GB (4.7% behind), the NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB (5.4% ahead), and the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation (6.1% behind). The RTX 6000D outperforms three of those four rivals, only trailing the A100 PCIe 80 GB.

Thus, the use-case split is straightforward. For a single DX12 gaming benchmark, the GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER wins outright. For compute-heavy applications that resemble OpenCL workloads, the RTX 6000D dominates, with an average score more than 31 times higher than the GeForce card’s 6270 average (195964 versus 6270). The data does not show any scenario where the RTX 6000D wins a gaming test, nor does it show a scenario where the GeForce card matches the RTX 6000D’s compute performance. The wins are exclusive to each card’s domain.

The Verdict

Based strictly on the recorded data, the choice depends entirely on the workload. The GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is the pick for users who prioritize the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, where it delivers 6269.5 points, beating the RTX 6000D by 78%. That score aligns it with the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102, which scores identically at 6270, and keeps it within 0.9% of the AMD Radeon R7 M350. The GeForce card’s 36th percentile ranking reflects its position relative to all GPUs, but within its own test, it is clearly superior to the RTX 6000D.

The RTX 6000D is the pick for users who need massive compute throughput, as evidenced by its Geekbench OpenCL score of 388405 and its 98th percentile ranking. Its average benchmark score of 195964 dwarfs the GeForce card’s 6270, and it sits ahead of three of its four nearest rivals: the Tesla V100S PCIe 32 GB, the A100 SXM4 40 GB, and the RTX 5000 Ada Generation. Only the A100 PCIe 80 GB outperforms it, by 5.4%. The RTX 6000D’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score is low, but that test appears irrelevant to its intended role, as its compute score and percentile suggest.

The verdict is not a blanket recommendation. The GeForce card wins the only head-to-head test, but the RTX 6000D wins the broader compute comparison by an enormous margin. Users facing a single gaming benchmark should choose the GeForce card. Users facing compute or professional workloads should choose the RTX 6000D. The data offers no middle ground, as the two cards do not overlap in their winning categories.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains exactly one head-to-head benchmark between the two cards: the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test. In that test, the GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER scores 6269.5, while the RTX 6000D scores 3522. The delta is 78%, meaning the GeForce card is 78% faster in this specific workload. That is a decisive win, and it is the only direct comparison available.

Looking at the GeForce card’s rivals in the same test, its average score of 6270 matches the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 exactly, with a delta of 0%. The AMD FirePro W600 trails by 0.8%, scoring 6223, while the AMD Radeon R7 M350 leads by 0.9%, scoring 6327. The GeForce card sits comfortably in the middle of this small cluster, well ahead of the RTX 6000D’s 3522.

For the RTX 6000D, the Geekbench OpenCL score of 388405 is not compared directly to the GeForce card, but it drives the RTX 6000D’s average to 195964. That average is 30.8 times the GeForce card’s average of 6270. In terms of nearest rivals, the RTX 6000D beats the Tesla V100S PCIe 32 GB (which has an average score of 194415, or 0.8% lower), the A100 SXM4 40 GB (187147, 4.7% lower), and the RTX 5000 Ada Generation (184664, 6.1% lower). It loses only to the A100 PCIe 80 GB, which scores 207124, or 5.4% higher.

The biggest win for the GeForce card is the 78% lead in Steel Nomad. The biggest win for the RTX 6000D is its compute average, which, while not a single head-to-head test, demonstrates a massive gap in the other direction. The data shows no other direct comparisons, so these two results define the entire competitive picture.

FAQ

Q: Which card wins the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER wins with a score of 6269.5, compared to the RTX 6000D’s 3522. That is a 78% advantage.

Q: Does the RTX 6000D have any benchmark where it clearly outperforms the GeForce card?

A: Yes, in the Geekbench OpenCL test, the RTX 6000D scores 388405. The GeForce card has no recorded OpenCL score, but the RTX 6000D’s average benchmark score of 195964 is far higher than the GeForce card’s 6270.

Q: How does the GeForce card compare to its nearest rivals?

A: In the Steel Nomad test, its average score of 6270 exactly matches the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 (0% delta). The AMD FirePro W600 is 0.8% lower at 6223, and the AMD Radeon R7 M350 is 0.9% higher at 6327.

Q: How does the RTX 6000D compare to its nearest rivals?

A: Its average score of 195964 is 0.8% higher than the Tesla V100S PCIe 32 GB (194415), 4.7% higher than the A100 SXM4 40 GB (187147), and 6.1% higher than the RTX 5000 Ada Generation (184664). The A100 PCIe 80 GB leads it by 5.4% with a score of 207124.

Q: What are the percentile rankings for each card?

A: The GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is at the 36th percentile across all GPUs. The RTX 6000D is at the 98th percentile.

Q: Is there any benchmark where both cards have comparable scores?

A: No. The only shared test is 3DMark Steel Nomad, where the GeForce card leads by 78%. The RTX 6000D’s other test, Geekbench OpenCL, is not recorded for the GeForce card.

Architecture Differences

Both cards use the Blackwell 2.0 architecture and are built on a 5 nm process at TSMC, but their chips differ substantially. The GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER uses the GB203 chip, which contains 45,600 million transistors on a 378 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 120.6 million per square millimeter. The RTX 6000D uses the GB202 chip, with 92,200 million transistors on a 750 mm² die, giving a density of 122.9 million per square millimeter. The RTX 6000D’s chip is roughly double the transistor count and nearly double the die area, which explains its higher compute throughput.

The RTX 6000D carries 19968 shading units, 624 texture mapping units, and 192 raster operations pipelines. The GeForce card has 8960 shading units, 280 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. The RTX 6000D also has 156 ray tracing cores and 624 tensor cores, while the GeForce card has 70 RT cores and 280 tensor cores. These differences scale with the chip size, giving the RTX 6000D more parallel resources across the board.

Clock speeds differ as well. The GeForce card has a base clock of 2295 MHz and a boost clock of 2452 MHz. The RTX 6000D has a lower base clock of 1992 MHz but a boost clock of 2430 MHz, only 22 MHz below the GeForce card. Despite the lower base clock, the RTX 6000D’s larger shader count yields far higher peak rates: 97.04 TFLOPS FP32 versus 43.94 TFLOPS for the GeForce card. The same ratio applies to FP16, with both cards offering 1:1 rates.

The RTX 6000D belongs to the GeForce 60-series generation and the Blackwell PRO W (x000) family, with a predecessor listed as Workstation Ada. The GeForce card is part of the GeForce 50-series, with no predecessor recorded. Both use PCIe 5.0 x16 and support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The RTX 6000D’s display outputs consist of 4x DisplayPort 2.1b, while the GeForce card offers 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b.

Specification Differences

The two cards diverge in almost every specification except the shared architecture, process node, and API support. Memory is a major differentiator. The GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has 16 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 896.0 GB/s and a memory clock of 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective). The RTX 6000D has 84 GB of GDDR7 on a 448-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 1.40 TB/s and a memory clock of 1560 MHz (25 Gbps effective). The RTX 6000D offers 5.25 times the memory capacity and 1.56 times the bandwidth.

Power and physical size also differ. The GeForce card has a TDP of 350 W and uses a single 16-pin connector. The RTX 6000D has a TDP of 600 W, also using a single 16-pin connector, but with a suggested PSU of 1000 W. Both are dual-slot cards, but the GeForce card is 48 mm wide (1.9 inches) while the RTX 6000D is 40 mm wide (1.6 inches). Both share the same length of 304 mm (12 inches) and height of 137 mm (5.4 inches).

The RTX 6000D has a higher pixel rate of 466.6 GPixel/s versus 235.4 GPixel/s for the GeForce card, and a texture rate of 1,516.3 GTexel/s versus 686.6 GTexel/s. The GeForce card launched on 2025-12-31, while the RTX 6000D launched earlier on 2025-07-13. Both are active in production. The RTX 6000D’s launch MSRP is 8,565 USD; the GeForce card’s launch MSRP is 749 USD. The RTX 6000D also lists a suggested PSU of 1000 W, a field not present for the GeForce card.