GPU Comparison

AMD

RADEON

AMD Radeon 890M

CORE STATE Strix Point

VRAM System Shared

CLOCK SPEED 2900 MHz

TDP 15 W

BUS WIDTH System Shared

ARCHITECTURE RDNA 3.5

PROCESS 4 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2024

NVIDIA

GEFORCE

RTX 6000 Ada Generation

CORE STATE AD102

VRAM 48 GB

CLOCK SPEED 2505 MHz

TDP 300 W

BUS WIDTH 384 bit

ARCHITECTURE Ada Lovelace

PROCESS 5 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2022

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12

590

N/A

geekbench_opencl

37,254

311,629

geekbench_vulkan

40,808

262,845

passmark_directx_10

N/A

passmark_directx_11

N/A

passmark_directx_12

N/A

passmark_directx_9

N/A

passmark_g2d

979

N/A

passmark_g3d

8,076

N/A

passmark_gpu_compute

4,157

N/A

Analysis: AMD Radeon 890M vs NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation

Analyzing the test numbers for NVIDIA's RTX 6000 and AMD's AMD Radeon 890M, a definite trend appears. NVIDIA's RTX 6000 steadily achieves stronger FPS in the evaluation. This rendering lead varies from substantial to exceptional relative to the specific title. Such consistency attests to underlying design superiority. Those prioritizing rendering capability would take note.

This video memory edge of NVIDIA's RTX 6000 gets increasingly critical at increased settings. High resolution scenarios consumes notable video memory, and NVIDIA's RTX 6000 provides more buffer. This leads into enhanced performance in demanding workloads. Modern titles can increasingly require greater VRAM. This advantage increases over the years.

When users facing a investment choice, NVIDIA's RTX 6000 emerges as the advised selection. Its steady benchmark advantage over AMD's AMD Radeon 890M positions it the smarter choice for gaming-focused users. Weigh your specific use cases, however the benchmarks leads toward NVIDIA's RTX 6000. Make an educated selection. The performance delta is significant and considerable.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION

890M

RTX 6000 Ada Generation

Core Specs

Shading Units

1,024

18,176 +1675.0%

Shaders

1,024

18,176 +1675.0%

TMUs

568 +787.5%

ROPs

192 +500.0%

Compute Units

—

SM Count

—

142

Clocks

Base Clock

400 MHz

915 MHz

Boost Clock

2900 MHz

2505 MHz

Memory Clock

System Shared

2500 MHz 20 Gbps effective

Memory

Memory Size

System Shared

48 GB

VRAM (MB)

—

49,152

Memory Type

System Shared

GDDR6

Memory Bus

System Shared

384 bit

Bandwidth

System Dependent

960.0 GB/s

Cache

L1 Cache

128 KB per Array

128 KB (per SM)

L2 Cache

2 MB

96 MB

L0 Cache

32 KB per WGP

—

Performance

Pixel Rate

92.80 GPixel/s

481.0 GPixel/s

Texture Rate

185.6 GTexel/s

1,422.8 GTexel/s

FP32 (TFLOPS)

5.939 TFLOPS

91.06 TFLOPS

FP64 (TFLOPS)

371.2 GFLOPS (1:16)

1,422.8 GFLOPS (1:64)

FP16 (TFLOPS)

5.939 TFLOPS (1:1)

91.06 TFLOPS (1:1)

AI/RT

RT Cores

142 +787.5%

Tensor Cores

—

568

Power

TDP

15 W

300 W

TDP (W)

300 +1900.0%

Suggested PSU

—

700 W

Power Connectors

None

1x 16-pin

Architecture

RDNA 3.5

Ada Lovelace

GPU Name

Strix Point

AD102

Generation

Navi III IGP (Strix Point Mobile)

Workstation Ada (x000A)

Process Size

4 nm

5 nm

Transistors

34,000 million

76,300 million

Die Size

233 mm²

609 mm²

Foundry

TSMC

Density

145.9M / mm²

125.3M / mm²

API Support

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

OpenGL

4.6

Vulkan

1.4

OpenCL

2.1

3.0

CUDA

—

8.9

Shader Model

6.8

Physical

Slot Width

IGP

Dual-slot

Length

—

267 mm 10.5 inches

Height

—

112 mm 4.4 inches

Outputs

Portable Device Dependent

4x DisplayPort 1.4a

Bus Interface

PCIe 4.0 x8

PCIe 4.0 x16

Other

Launch Price

—

6,799 USD

Production

Active

End-of-life

Predecessor

Navi II IGP

Workstation Ampere

Successor

—

Blackwell PRO W

View Radeon 890M Details View RTX 6000 Ada Generation Details

GPU Comparison

AMD Radeon 890M

RTX 6000 Ada Generation

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

Analysis: AMD Radeon 890M vs NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

Related Graphics Cards

Related Comparisons