NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 vs Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark results between the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 and the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA. Both entries have an average benchmark score of 0, with zero wins recorded for either part. The percentile versus all GPUs is identical at 50 for both. This means the comparison must rely entirely on the architectural and specification data present in the database.

The NVIDIA part delivers 32.69 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, while the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA delivers 24.58 TFLOPS. That places the NVIDIA part roughly 33% ahead in single-precision floating-point throughput. In FP16, the NVIDIA part maintains 32.69 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio, whereas the Lisuan Tech part reaches 49.15 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio. The Lisuan Tech part is approximately 50% ahead in half-precision performance. Pixel throughput favors the Lisuan Tech part slightly at 192.0 GPixel/s versus 188.2 GPixel/s for the NVIDIA part. Texture rate goes the other way, with NVIDIA at 510.7 GTexel/s against 384.0 GTexel/s, a margin of roughly 33%.

The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 shows a higher memory bandwidth at 576.0 GB/s compared to the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA's 432.0 GB/s. That is a 144.0 GB/s gap, or about 33% more bandwidth for the NVIDIA part. However, the Lisuan Tech part has a larger memory capacity at 24 GB versus 16 GB, a 50% advantage in total VRAM.

Architecture Differences

The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 uses the AD103 chip built on Ada Lovelace architecture. The process node is 5 nm at TSMC, with the die containing 45,900 million transistors on a 379 mm² die. Transistor density works out to 121.1 million transistors per square millimeter. The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA uses the 7G105 chip based on the TrueGPU architecture, built on a 6 nm process also at TSMC. Transistor count and die size are listed as unknown in the database, so no density figure can be calculated.

The NVIDIA part belongs to the GeForce 50-series and the Ada-MW generation, with a predecessor listed as Ampere-MW and a successor as Blackwell-MW. The Lisuan Tech part belongs to the 7G100 generation, with no predecessor or successor recorded. The NVIDIA part has 76 RT cores and 304 tensor cores. The Lisuan Tech part has no RT core or tensor core counts recorded in the database. The shading unit count differs substantially: 9,728 for NVIDIA versus 6,144 for the Lisuan Tech part. Texture mapping units stand at 304 for NVIDIA and 192 for the Lisuan Tech part. Raster output units are 112 for NVIDIA and 96 for the Lisuan Tech part.

The NVIDIA part supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The Lisuan Tech part also supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6, but only Vulkan 1.3. Both use GDDR6 memory and PCIe 4.0 x16 interfaces. The NVIDIA part is an IGP slot width with no power connectors, drawing 150 W. The Lisuan Tech part is a dual-slot design with a single 16-pin power connector, drawing 225 W, and lists a suggested PSU of 550 W. Display outputs for the NVIDIA part are listed as portable device dependent, while the Lisuan Tech part provides 4x DisplayPort 1.4a.

Where Each One Wins

The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 wins in FP32 compute, delivering 32.69 TFLOPS against the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA's 24.58 TFLOPS. It also leads in texture fill rate at 510.7 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel/s, and in memory bandwidth at 576.0 GB/s versus 432.0 GB/s. The NVIDIA part has more shading units, more TMUs, more ROPs, and includes dedicated RT and tensor cores. Its 256-bit memory bus is wider than the 192-bit bus on the Lisuan Tech part. The NVIDIA part also has a lower power draw at 150 W compared to 225 W, and uses no external power connector. Its compact IGP form factor suits embedded and portable applications. Vulkan 1.4 support is a generation ahead of the Lisuan Tech part's Vulkan 1.3.

The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA wins in FP16 throughput with 49.15 TFLOPS versus 32.69 TFLOPS on the NVIDIA part. It has more memory capacity at 24 GB versus 16 GB. Pixel fill rate is slightly higher at 192.0 GPixel/s versus 188.2 GPixel/s. It offers a dual-slot layout with 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs, which suits traditional desktop or workstation mounting. Its dimensions are recorded at 268 mm in length, 112 mm in height, and 40 mm in width. The Lisuan Tech part also has a higher thermal design power of 225 W, which may allow for more sustained performance in power-unconstrained environments, though the database does not include sustained-load measurements to confirm this. The NVIDIA part's 5 nm process node is one step ahead of the Lisuan Tech part's 6 nm node, though the exact impact on efficiency is not directly quantified in the recorded data.

Specification Differences

The two parts differ across several recorded specifications. The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 has a base clock of 930 MHz and a boost clock of 1680 MHz, while the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has no base or boost clock recorded. Memory clock is identical at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective for both. Memory size differs: 16 GB for NVIDIA versus 24 GB for the Lisuan Tech part. Memory bus width is 256 bit for NVIDIA versus 192 bit for the Lisuan Tech part, producing bandwidth of 576.0 GB/s versus 432.0 GB/s.

Shading units are 9,728 versus 6,144. TMUs are 304 versus 192. ROPs are 112 versus 96. The NVIDIA part has 76 RT cores and 304 tensor cores; the Lisuan Tech part has neither listed. FP32 performance is 32.69 TFLOPS versus 24.58 TFLOPS. FP16 performance is 32.69 TFLOPS (1:1) versus 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1). TDP is 150 W versus 225 W. Slot width is IGP versus dual-slot. Power connectors are none versus 1x 16-pin. The Lisuan Tech part lists a suggested PSU of 550 W; the NVIDIA part has no suggested PSU recorded. Display outputs are portable device dependent versus 4x DisplayPort 1.4a. Vulkan support is 1.4 versus 1.3. DirectX and OpenGL support match at 12 Ultimate (12_2) and 4.6 respectively.

Release dates differ: the NVIDIA part was released on 2023-03-20, while the Lisuan Tech part is dated 2026-03-16. The NVIDIA part has a listed predecessor and successor in the database, while the Lisuan Tech part has none. Transistor count and die size are known for the NVIDIA part but unknown for the Lisuan Tech part. The NVIDIA part's process node is 5 nm versus 6 nm for the Lisuan Tech part. The Lisuan Tech part has recorded dimensions of 268 mm by 112 mm by 40 mm, while the NVIDIA part has no dimensions recorded.

FAQ

Q: Which card has higher FP32 compute performance?

A: The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 delivers 32.69 TFLOPS of FP32, while the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA delivers 24.58 TFLOPS. The NVIDIA part leads by roughly 33%.

Q: Which card has more memory capacity?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has 24 GB of GDDR6 memory, while the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 has 16 GB. The Lisuan Tech part offers 50% more capacity.

Q: Do both cards support the same API versions?

A: Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The NVIDIA part supports Vulkan 1.4, while the Lisuan Tech part supports Vulkan 1.3.

Q: Which card has higher memory bandwidth?

A: The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 has 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth, compared to 432.0 GB/s for the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA. The NVIDIA part leads by 144.0 GB/s.

Q: What are the power requirements for each card?

A: The NVIDIA part has a TDP of 150 W and no power connectors. The Lisuan Tech part has a TDP of 225 W, requires a 1x 16-pin power connector, and lists a suggested PSU of 550 W.

Q: Which card is better for half-precision workloads?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA reaches 49.15 TFLOPS in FP16 with a 2:1 ratio, versus 32.69 TFLOPS in FP16 with a 1:1 ratio for the NVIDIA part. The Lisuan Tech part holds a 50% advantage in this metric.

The Verdict

The data points to distinct usage profiles for each part. The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 is the stronger choice for FP32-focused workloads, texture-heavy rendering, and applications that benefit from higher memory bandwidth. Its 32.69 TFLOPS FP32, 510.7 GTexel/s texture rate, and 576.0 GB/s bandwidth all exceed the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA's corresponding figures. The presence of 76 RT cores and 304 tensor cores adds hardware acceleration for ray tracing and tensor operations, capabilities not recorded for the Lisuan Tech part. The lower 150 W power draw and connector-free IGP design make it suited for embedded or portable configurations where space and power are constrained.

The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA is the better option for workloads that prioritize FP16 throughput, large memory capacity, or conventional mounting. Its 49.15 TFLOPS FP16 performance is 50% above the NVIDIA part, and its 24 GB VRAM exceeds the NVIDIA part by 8 GB. The dual-slot design with 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs supports multi-display setups directly. The higher 225 W TDP and 550 W suggested PSU imply a system built around a standard desktop power supply rather than an embedded platform. Pixel fill rate is marginally higher at 192.0 GPixel/s versus 188.2 GPixel/s.

Neither part has recorded benchmark scores in the database, so direct performance comparisons remain limited to theoretical specifications. The NVIDIA part's 5 nm process node and higher transistor count on a 379 mm² die indicate a more densely packed design, though the Lisuan Tech part's transistor details are unknown. For users needing maximum FP32, bandwidth, and hardware ray tracing, the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 aligns with those requirements. For users needing FP16 throughput, 24 GB capacity, and standard display outputs, the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA fits those criteria. The release dates differ by roughly three years, with the NVIDIA part dated 2023-03-20 and the Lisuan Tech part dated 2026-03-16, which may reflect different design priorities across generations. Both parts sit at the 50th percentile in the database, indicating no recorded differentiation in overall standing among all GPUs.