NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation vs Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA Comparison

FAQ

Q: How does the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation compare to the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA in overall benchmark performance?

A: The RTX 5000 Ada Generation has an average benchmark score of 184,664, placing it in the 98th percentile of all GPUs. The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has no recorded benchmark scores and an average score of 0, placing it in the 50th percentile.

Q: What are the specific benchmark scores recorded for the RTX 5000 Ada Generation?

A: The database shows a Geekbench OpenCL score of 175,286 and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 194,041 for the RTX 5000 Ada Generation. No benchmark scores are recorded for the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA.

Q: How does the RTX 5000 Ada Generation compare to its nearest rivals in the database?

A: The RTX 5000 Ada Generation sits 0.5% above the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB, 1.3% below the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 40 GB, 1.4% above the NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell, and 3.7% above the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D in average benchmark score.

Q: What are the memory specifications for each GPU?

A: The RTX 5000 Ada Generation uses 32 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus with 576.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA uses 24 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. Both use 2250 MHz memory clocks with 18 Gbps effective speed.

Q: What are the compute specifications for each GPU?

A: The RTX 5000 Ada Generation has 12,800 shading units, 400 TMUs, 176 ROPs, 100 RT cores, and 400 tensor cores. The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has 6,144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs, with no recorded RT core or tensor core counts.

Q: What are the power requirements for each GPU?

A: The RTX 5000 Ada Generation has a 250 W TDP and a suggested power supply of 600 W. The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has a 225 W TDP and a suggested power supply of 550 W. Both use a single 16-pin power connector and are dual-slot cards.

The Verdict

The data presents a clear separation between these two GPUs. The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation delivers substantial compute resources across every measurable category. Its average benchmark score of 184,664 places it near the top of the entire database, within 1.3% of the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 40 GB and 3.7% ahead of the GeForce RTX 4090 D.

The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has no recorded benchmarks in the database. Its 50th percentile ranking and zero average score mean there is no empirical performance data to compare against the RTX 5000 Ada Generation. The specification sheet shows a smaller GPU with fewer execution units, but without benchmark results, its real-world performance cannot be quantified.

For users requiring proven workstation compute performance, the RTX 5000 Ada Generation is the only option with recorded data. Its 98th percentile standing and verified Geekbench scores of 175,286 in OpenCL and 194,041 in Vulkan provide concrete evidence of capability. The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA offers a larger memory pool than many mid-range cards at 24 GB, but the absence of any recorded scores limits what can be stated about its actual performance.

The RTX 5000 Ada Generation also carries architectural advantages in shading units, texture units, and ROPs. Its 12,800 shading units more than double the 6,144 in the LX ULTRA. The 400 TMUs versus 192 TMUs and 176 ROPs versus 96 ROPs indicate a substantially wider execution pipeline. The RT core count of 100 and tensor core count of 400 on the RTX 5000 Ada Generation have no counterpart in the LX ULTRA data, since those fields are not recorded for the latter.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no head-to-head benchmark entries between these two GPUs. The wins count is zero for both sides. Consequently, the comparison relies entirely on the individual benchmark records and the specification sheet.

The RTX 5000 Ada Generation achieves a Geekbench OpenCL score of 175,286 and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 194,041. These scores place its average at 184,664. The nearest rival data shows the RTX 5000 Ada Generation delivers performance within 0.5% of the A100 SXM4 80 GB and 1.4% above the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell. Those deltas indicate the card operates in the same performance tier as the A100 series, which is a data-center class accelerator.

The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has no benchmark records. Its average score is recorded as 0, and its nearest rivals list is empty. The percentile rank of 50 places it at the median of all GPUs in the database, but that ranking appears derived from the absence of data rather than measured performance.

Compute throughput figures reinforce the performance gap. The RTX 5000 Ada Generation delivers 65.28 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 65.28 TFLOPS of FP16 compute in a 1:1 ratio. The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA delivers 24.58 TFLOPS of FP32, which is 62.3% lower, and 49.15 TFLOPS of FP16 in a 2:1 ratio. The FP16 ratio difference indicates the LX ULTRA uses a different execution model for half-precision work, but its absolute FP16 output remains 24.7% below the RTX 5000 Ada Generation.

Pixel and texture rates follow the same pattern. The RTX 5000 Ada Generation processes 448.8 GPixel/s and 1,020.0 GTexel/s. The LX ULTRA processes 192.0 GPixel/s and 384.0 GTexel/s. These figures show the RTX 5000 Ada Generation maintains 57.2% higher pixel throughput and 62.4% higher texture throughput.

Memory bandwidth also favors the RTX 5000 Ada Generation. Its 576.0 GB/s bandwidth exceeds the 432.0 GB/s of the LX ULTRA by 33.3%. The 32 GB memory capacity versus 24 GB provides a 33.3% larger framebuffer, which matters for large dataset workloads in workstation environments.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ across nearly every recorded specification field. Process node technology separates them: the RTX 5000 Ada Generation uses a 5 nm process, while the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA uses a 6 nm process. Both are fabricated by TSMC.

Transistor counts and die sizes are recorded only for the RTX 5000 Ada Generation. It contains 76,300 million transistors on a 609 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 125.3M per mm². The LX ULTRA has unknown transistor count and die size in the database.

Clock behavior differs significantly. The RTX 5000 Ada Generation has a base clock of 1155 MHz and a boost clock of 2550 MHz. The LX ULTRA has no recorded base or boost clocks. Memory clocks are identical at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed.

Memory configuration diverges in capacity and bus width. The RTX 5000 Ada Generation uses 32 GB on a 256-bit bus. The LX ULTRA uses 24 GB on a 192-bit bus. Both use GDDR6 memory.

Execution unit counts are substantially different. The RTX 5000 Ada Generation has 12,800 shading units, 400 TMUs, and 176 ROPs. The LX ULTRA has 6,144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. The RTX 5000 Ada Generation includes 100 RT cores and 400 tensor cores; these fields are null for the LX ULTRA.

Power specifications differ by 25 W. The RTX 5000 Ada Generation has a 250 W TDP and a 600 W suggested power supply. The LX ULTRA has a 225 W TDP and a 550 W suggested power supply. Both are dual-slot cards with a single 16-pin power connector.

Physical dimensions are nearly identical. The RTX 5000 Ada Generation measures 267 mm in length and 112 mm in height. The LX ULTRA measures 268 mm in length, 112 mm in height, and 40 mm in width. The width of the RTX 5000 Ada Generation is not recorded.

API support shows one difference. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The RTX 5000 Ada Generation supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX ULTRA supports Vulkan 1.3.

Release dates differ by roughly two and a half years. The RTX 5000 Ada Generation was released on 2023-08-08. The LX ULTRA is dated 2026-03-16. The RTX 5000 Ada Generation lists a predecessor, Workstation Ampere, and a successor, Blackwell PRO W. The LX ULTRA has no predecessor or successor recorded.

Architecture Differences

The RTX 5000 Ada Generation uses the AD102 chip built on the Ada Lovelace architecture. It belongs to the Workstation Ada generation and the GeForce 50-series product family. The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA uses the 7G105 chip built on the TrueGPU architecture, belonging to the 7G100 generation. Its manufacturer is listed as unknown.

The Ada Lovelace architecture includes dedicated RT cores and tensor cores, which are present in the RTX 5000 Ada Generation at counts of 100 and 400 respectively. The LX ULTRA has no recorded RT core or tensor core counts, suggesting either absence of such hardware or lack of documentation in the database. The TrueGPU architecture name implies a different design philosophy, but the available data does not specify how it handles ray tracing or tensor operations.

FP16 compute ratios reveal an architectural difference. The RTX 5000 Ada Generation achieves FP16 performance at a 1:1 ratio with FP32, meaning 65.28 TFLOPS in both formats. The LX ULTRA achieves FP16 at a 2:1 ratio, delivering 49.15 TFLOPS of FP16 versus 24.58 TFLOPS of FP32. The 1:1 ratio indicates the Ada Lovelace design pairs FP32 and FP16 execution units directly, while the 2:1 ratio in the LX ULTRA suggests a separate or shared execution path that favors half-precision throughput.

The process node difference of 5 nm versus 6 nm affects transistor density. The RTX 5000 Ada Generation packs 76,300 million transistors into 609 mm², a density of 125.3M per mm². The LX ULTRA has no recorded transistor information, so its density cannot be compared.

Both GPUs support PCIe 4.0 x16 and feature four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs. The display output configuration is identical. The DX12 Ultimate support is identical as well, which means both cards implement the same DirectX feature level for gaming and rendering workloads.

The generation naming differs: Workstation Ada versus 7G100. The RTX 5000 Ada Generation has a clear lineage with a predecessor and successor, while the LX ULTRA appears as a standalone entry with no recorded lineage. This suggests the RTX 5000 Ada Generation is part of an established product roadmap, whereas the LX ULTRA may be a first-generation or isolated product.