AMD Radeon RX 7600M vs NVIDIA N1X 40SM Comparison

AMD Radeon RX 7600M and NVIDIA N1X 40SM occupy very different positions in the database. The RX 7600M is an established mobile GPU with a recorded Geekbench OpenCL score of 63,775, placing it in the 89th percentile of all GPUs. The N1X 40SM, by contrast, has no recorded benchmark scores and sits at the 50th percentile. The data indicates that the RX 7600M is the only one of the two with measurable performance data, while the N1X 40SM presents a specification sheet without empirical results.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon RX 7600M wins in every measured category because it is the only unit with benchmark results. Its Geekbench OpenCL score of 63,775 places it in the 89th percentile of all GPUs, a position that reflects a functioning, tested product. The nearest rivals in the database confirm its standing: the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP scores 63,830, a delta of -0.1% relative to the RX 7600M, and the NVIDIA CMP 30HX scores 63,842, also -0.1%. The AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 trails by a hair at 63,693, a delta of +0.1%, while the AMD Radeon Pro WX 9100 sits ahead at 64,212, a -0.7% delta. These margins are all under one percent, indicating that the RX 7600M sits in a tightly packed performance cluster.

The NVIDIA N1X 40SM has zero recorded wins. Its benchmark array is empty, its average benchmark score is 0, and it has no nearest rivals listed. The specification sheet shows higher raw resources: 5,120 shading units, 320 TMUs, 40 RT cores, and 160 tensor cores, compared to the RX 7600M's 1,792 shading units, 112 TMUs, 28 RT cores, and no tensor cores. The N1X 40SM also lists 24.02 TFLOPS FP32 performance versus 17.27 TFLOPS for the RX 7600M. However, without benchmark data, the database cannot confirm that these specifications translate into actual performance wins.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from different architectural generations. The AMD Radeon RX 7600M uses the Navi 33 chip, built on RDNA 3.0 architecture with the codename Hotpink Bonefish. It belongs to the Navi Mobile generation of the RX 7000M series. The fabrication process is 6 nm at TSMC, with 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die. Transistor density calculates to 65.2 million per square millimeter. The NVIDIA N1X 40SM uses the GB20B chip, built on Blackwell 2.0 architecture, and belongs to the Blackwell IGP (N1x) generation. Its process node is 5 nm at TSMC, with an unknown transistor count and a 382 mm² die size.

Memory configurations differ substantially. The RX 7600M has 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, yielding 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth. Its memory clock runs at 2000 MHz, with 16 Gbps effective speed. The N1X 40SM uses 128 GB of LPDDR5X on a 256-bit bus, delivering 273.2 GB/s of bandwidth. Its memory clock is 1067 MHz with 8.5 Gbps effective speed. The N1X 40SM has 16 times the memory capacity and a slightly wider bus, but the bandwidth advantage is modest at 17.2 GB/s.

Clock behavior also separates the two. The RX 7600M has a base clock of 1500 MHz, a boost clock of 2410 MHz, and a game clock of 2070 MHz. The N1X 40SM has a much lower base clock of 741 MHz but a boost clock of 2346 MHz. The RX 7600M maintains higher clocks across the board, which helps explain its competitive texture and pixel rates despite fewer execution units.

Compute resource counts reveal a significant architectural divergence. The RX 7600M has 1,792 shading units, 112 TMUs, and 64 ROPs. The N1X 40SM has 5,120 shading units, 320 TMUs, and only 40 ROPs. The N1X 40SM has nearly three times the shading units and TMUs but fewer ROPs. The pixel rate reflects this: the RX 7600M achieves 154.2 GPixel/s while the N1X 40SM manages 93.84 GPixel/s. The texture rate tells the opposite story: the RX 7600M reaches 269.9 GTexel/s while the N1X 40SM reaches 750.7 GTexel/s.

The FP16 throughput shows a design philosophy difference. The RX 7600M delivers 34.55 TFLOPS FP16 at a 2:1 ratio relative to FP32, indicating dedicated or doubled-rate half-precision execution. The N1X 40SM delivers 24.02 TFLOPS FP16 at a 1:1 ratio, meaning its FP16 and FP32 rates are identical. The RX 7600M has 28 RT cores; the N1X 40SM has 40 RT cores and 160 tensor cores. The RX 7600M lists no tensor cores.

Interface and output differences are present. The RX 7600M uses PCIe 4.0 x16, while the N1X 40SM uses PCIe 5.0 x16. Display outputs for the RX 7600M are listed as portable device dependent, while the N1X 40SM lists one HDMI output. Both are IGP slot width with no power connectors. The RX 7600M has a 90 W TDP; the N1X 40SM has an unknown TDP. API support also differs: the RX 7600M supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The N1X 40SM lists N/A for DirectX, OpenGL, and Vulkan.

The Verdict

The database records only one product with measurable performance. The AMD Radeon RX 7600M has a Geekbench OpenCL score of 63,775, an 89th percentile ranking, and a set of nearest rivals confirming its position. The NVIDIA N1X 40SM has no benchmarks, no rivals, and a 50th percentile ranking with an average score of zero. Any selection between the two based on data must favor the RX 7600M, because it is the only unit with evidence of performance.

For a workload that depends on established driver support and measured compute output, the RX 7600M is the only defensible choice. It has a recorded score, active production status, a release date of January 3, 2023, and a full API set including DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The N1X 40SM, released later on May 31, 2026, presents a specification sheet with higher raw compute counts and a larger memory pool, but the absence of benchmark data means those specifications cannot be verified in practice.

The specification sheet does favor the N1X 40SM in several areas. It has more shading units, more TMUs, more RT cores, tensor cores, a larger memory capacity, higher FP32 throughput, and a newer PCIe interface. But a benchmark database relies on measured results. The N1X 40SM delivers none. The RX 7600M delivers one score, and that score places it among a tight cluster of competitors all within 0.7% of each other. For users requiring a GPU with demonstrated performance, the RX 7600M is the only option with supporting data.

FAQ

Q: What is the recorded Geekbench OpenCL score for the AMD Radeon RX 7600M?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7600M has a Geekbench OpenCL score of 63,775, placing it in the 89th percentile of all GPUs.

Q: Does the NVIDIA N1X 40SM have any benchmark results in the database?

A: No. The NVIDIA N1X 40SM has an empty benchmark array, an average benchmark score of 0, and no nearest rivals listed.

Q: How does the RX 7600M compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP scores 63,830 (delta -0.1%), the NVIDIA CMP 30HX scores 63,842 (delta -0.1%), the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 scores 63,693 (delta +0.1%), and the AMD Radeon Pro WX 9100 scores 64,212 (delta -0.7%).

Q: What are the memory configurations of the two GPUs?

A: The RX 7600M has 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth. The N1X 40SM has 128 GB of LPDDR5X on a 256-bit bus with 273.2 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Which GPU has higher FP32 compute?

A: The NVIDIA N1X 40SM lists 24.02 TFLOPS FP32, while the AMD Radeon RX 7600M lists 17.27 TFLOPS FP32.

Q: What is the process node difference between the two?

A: The RX 7600M is built on a 6 nm process at TSMC, while the N1X 40SM is built on a 5 nm process at TSMC.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

There are no head-to-head benchmark entries recorded between the AMD Radeon RX 7600M and the NVIDIA N1X 40SM. The head-to-head array is empty, and the win counts for both products are zero. The only comparative data available comes from the RX 7600M's nearest rivals, which show how it performs against other GPUs in the database.

The RX 7600M's Geekbench OpenCL score of 63,775 positions it within a narrow band of competitors. The AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP averages 63,830, a delta of -0.1%, meaning the RX 7600M trails by roughly 55 points. The NVIDIA CMP 30HX averages 63,842, also a -0.1% delta, a gap of about 67 points. The AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 averages 63,693, a delta of +0.1%, meaning the RX 7600M leads by about 82 points. The AMD Radeon Pro WX 9100 averages 64,212, a delta of -0.7%, a gap of about 437 points. These deltas are small, all under one percent, indicating that the RX 7600M is competitive with a range of discrete and professional GPUs.

The N1X 40SM cannot be placed in any comparative ranking. Its average benchmark score of 0 and 50th percentile ranking reflect the absence of data. The specification sheet shows it has the raw resources to potentially outperform the RX 7600M in compute-heavy workloads: 5,120 shading units versus 1,792, 320 TMUs versus 112, 40 RT cores versus 28, and 160 tensor cores versus none. Its FP32 throughput of 24.02 TFLOPS exceeds the RX 7600M's 17.27 TFLOPS by a margin of 6.75 TFLOPS. Its texture rate of 750.7 GTexel/s is nearly three times the RX 7600M's 269.9 GTexel/s.

But the RX 7600M holds advantages in other measured or specified areas. Its pixel rate of 154.2 GPixel/s exceeds the N1X 40SM's 93.84 GPixel/s. Its boost clock of 2410 MHz is higher than the N1X 40SM's 2346 MHz. Its base clock of 1500 MHz is more than double the N1X 40SM's 741 MHz. The RX 7600M supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, while the N1X 40SM lists N/A for all three. The RX 7600M has a known TDP of 90 W; the N1X 40SM's TDP is unknown.

The database records a release date of January 3, 2023 for the RX 7600M and May 31, 2026 for the N1X 40SM. Both are listed as active production status. Both are IGP slot width with no power connectors. The RX 7600M uses PCIe 4.0 x16; the N1X 40SM uses PCIe 5.0 x16. The RX 7600M's display outputs are portable device dependent; the N1X 40SM has one HDMI output. Neither has a launch MSRP recorded.

The closest the database comes to a head-to-head comparison is the RX 7600M's position among its nearest rivals. All four rivals are within 0.7% of its score, and three are within 0.1%. This suggests that the RX 7600M is a stable, predictable performer in its class. The N1X 40SM, lacking any benchmark results, cannot be compared to anything. The data supports only one conclusion: the RX 7600M has verified performance, and the N1X 40SM does not.