NVIDIA Jetson T5000 vs Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data contains no direct benchmark results for either the NVIDIA Jetson T5000 or the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA. Both products show an average benchmark score of zero and hold identical percentile positions at 50% relative to all GPUs in the database. This means there are no measured performance comparisons available to establish head-to-head wins in compute workloads, rendering tests, or gaming applications. The absence of benchmark data is itself informative: neither device has generated validated performance metrics in the database, so any performance conclusion must be drawn from their architectural specifications and theoretical throughput figures.

The raw compute specifications provide the only measurable basis for comparison. The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA delivers a maximum FP32 throughput of 24.58 TFLOPS, which is approximately three times the 8.064 TFLOPS offered by the NVIDIA Jetson T5000. In FP16 workloads, the LX ULTRA reaches 49.15 TFLOPS using a 2:1 ratio, while the T5000 sustains 8.064 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio. This represents a six-fold advantage for the LX ULTRA in half-precision compute. The pixel fill rate for the LX ULTRA is 192.0 GPixel/s against 50.40 GPixel/s for the T5000, a 3.8x difference. Texture fill rates show 384.0 GTexel/s versus 126.0 GTexel/s, a 3.0x margin in favor of the Lisuan product.

Memory bandwidth tells a different story in terms of efficiency. The LX ULTRA has 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth from a 192-bit bus with GDDR6 memory, while the T5000 manages 273.2 GB/s from a 256-bit bus with LPDDR5X. The LX ULTRA achieves 1.58 times the bandwidth of the T5000 despite having a narrower bus, which reflects the higher effective memory clock of 18 Gbps versus 8.5 Gbps. However, the T5000 offers 128 GB of memory capacity against 24 GB on the LX ULTRA, a 5.3x advantage in total memory size. This capacity difference may matter more than raw bandwidth for certain workloads, but the benchmark data does not quantify that impact.

Architecture Differences

The two devices come from different architectural lineages. The NVIDIA Jetson T5000 uses the GB10B chip built on the Blackwell architecture, belonging to the Server Blackwell (Bxx) generation. Its process node is 5 nm, fabricated by TSMC, with a die size of 391 mm². The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA uses the 7G105 chip based on the TrueGPU architecture, from the 7G100 generation. Its process node is 6 nm, also fabricated by TSMC, though its die size is not recorded. The T5000 has a 1 nm process advantage, which typically allows higher transistor density, but the LX ULTRA compensates with a much larger shading unit count.

The compute resources differ substantially. The T5000 contains 2560 shading units, 80 texture mapping units, and 32 raster output units. The LX ULTRA contains 6144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 96 raster output units. That is 2.4x more shading units, 2.4x more TMUs, and 3.0x more ROPs on the Lisuan product. The T5000 includes 20 ray tracing cores and 96 tensor cores, while the LX ULTRA has no recorded ray tracing or tensor core counts. This means the T5000 offers dedicated hardware for ray tracing and AI acceleration, features that are absent from the LX ULTRA's specification sheet.

Memory architecture differs in type and configuration. The T5000 uses 128 GB of LPDDR5X with a 256-bit bus, while the LX ULTRA uses 24 GB of GDDR6 with a 192-bit bus. The T5000's memory clock is 1067 MHz with 8.5 Gbps effective transfer, while the LX ULTRA's memory clock is 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective transfer. The T5000 is an integrated graphics processor (IGP) with no display outputs and no power connectors, consuming 120 W TDP. The LX ULTRA is a dual-slot card with a single 16-pin power connector, four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs, and a 225 W TDP. The T5000 uses a PCIe 5.0 x8 interface, while the LX ULTRA uses PCIe 4.0 x16.

API support also separates the two. The T5000 lists no API support for DirectX, OpenGL, or Vulkan, all marked as N/A. The LX ULTRA supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.3. This indicates the LX ULTRA is designed for consumer graphics workloads, while the T5000 lacks standard graphics API support entirely. The T5000's physical dimensions are 87 mm length, 100 mm height, and 15 mm width, versus 268 mm length, 112 mm height, and 40 mm width for the LX ULTRA.

Where Each One Wins

Based on recorded specifications, the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA wins in raw compute throughput. Its FP32 performance of 24.58 TFLOPS is three times the T5000's 8.064 TFLOPS. Its FP16 performance of 49.15 TFLOPS is six times the T5000's 8.064 TFLOPS. Its pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s is nearly four times higher, and its texture rate of 384.0 GTexel/s is three times higher. The LX ULTRA also provides higher memory bandwidth at 432.0 GB/s versus 273.2 GB/s, which benefits bandwidth-intensive workloads. The LX ULTRA has standard graphics API support with DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.3, making it suitable for gaming and general-purpose graphics applications. Its four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs support multi-display configurations.

The NVIDIA Jetson T5000 wins in memory capacity. Its 128 GB of LPDDR5X is more than five times the 24 GB on the LX ULTRA. This capacity advantage is significant for large model inference, data processing, or in-memory databases where dataset size exceeds the available memory. The T5000 also includes dedicated ray tracing cores (20) and tensor cores (96), which the LX ULTRA lacks entirely. These hardware accelerators provide specialized processing paths for ray-traced rendering and neural network workloads. The T5000 operates at 120 W TDP versus 225 W for the LX ULTRA, making it more power-efficient per unit of memory capacity. The T5000 uses a PCIe 5.0 x8 interface, which offers double the per-lane bandwidth of PCIe 4.0, though the LX ULTRA uses sixteen lanes versus eight, resulting in comparable total interface bandwidth.

The T5000's integrated form factor, with no display outputs and no power connectors, suits embedded or server deployments where discrete graphics output is unnecessary. The LX ULTRA's dual-slot design and 16-pin power connector suggest a conventional add-in card intended for desktop or workstation use. The T5000's 5 nm process node provides a manufacturing advantage over the LX ULTRA's 6 nm node, though the LX ULTRA's larger shading unit count suggests a physically bigger chip.

The Verdict

The data indicates a clear split in intended use cases. The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA delivers substantially higher raw compute throughput across every measured metric: FP32, FP16, pixel fill rate, and texture fill rate. It also provides higher memory bandwidth and full graphics API support. For applications that depend on raw shader performance, high fill rates, or standard graphics rendering, the LX ULTRA is the stronger choice based on recorded specifications. Its 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 and 49.15 TFLOPS FP16 figures put it in a different performance class than the T5000.

The NVIDIA Jetson T5000 offers advantages in memory capacity and specialized hardware. With 128 GB of memory, it can handle datasets that would exhaust the LX ULTRA's 24 GB capacity. The presence of 20 ray tracing cores and 96 tensor cores provides dedicated acceleration paths that the LX ULTRA cannot match, since those hardware units are not present in its specification sheet. The T5000 also consumes less power at 120 W versus 225 W and uses a more advanced 5 nm process node.

Neither device has recorded benchmark data, so the percentile positions of 50% for both are identical and do not indicate relative performance. The average benchmark score of zero for both confirms that no validated measurements exist in the database. Any purchasing decision must rely on the architectural specifications presented here.

For workloads requiring maximum memory capacity, specialized AI acceleration through tensor cores, or ray tracing capabilities, the NVIDIA Jetson T5000 is the appropriate selection from the data. For workloads requiring maximum shader throughput, higher memory bandwidth, or standard graphics API compatibility, the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA is the appropriate selection from the data. The LX ULTRA also has the advantage of display outputs, supporting up to four DisplayPort 1.4a monitors, while the T5000 has no display outputs at all.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher FP32 performance?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 performance, while the NVIDIA Jetson T5000 has 8.064 TFLOPS. The LX ULTRA is approximately three times faster in FP32 compute.

Q: Which GPU has more memory capacity?

A: The NVIDIA Jetson T5000 has 128 GB of LPDDR5X memory, while the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has 24 GB of GDDR6 memory. The T5000 provides more than five times the memory capacity.

Q: Does the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA support ray tracing?

A: No. The LX ULTRA's specification sheet records no ray tracing cores. The NVIDIA Jetson T5000 includes 20 ray tracing cores.

Q: What graphics APIs does the NVIDIA Jetson T5000 support?

A: The T5000 lists no graphics API support: DirectX, OpenGL, and Vulkan are all marked as N/A. The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.3.

Q: Which GPU has higher memory bandwidth?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has 432.0 GB/s bandwidth, while the NVIDIA Jetson T5000 has 273.2 GB/s. The LX ULTRA achieves this with a 192-bit bus and 18 Gbps effective memory speed, versus a 256-bit bus and 8.5 Gbps effective speed on the T5000.

Q: What is the power consumption of each GPU?

A: The NVIDIA Jetson T5000 has a 120 W TDP, while the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has a 225 W TDP. The T5000 uses no power connectors and has no suggested PSU rating, while the LX ULTRA uses a single 16-pin connector with a 550 W suggested PSU.

Specification Differences

| Specification | NVIDIA Jetson T5000 | Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA |

| --- | --- | --- |

| Chip | GB10B | 7G105 |

| Architecture | Blackwell | TrueGPU |

| Generation | Server Blackwell (Bxx) | 7G100 |

| Process Node | 5 nm | 6 nm |

| Die Size | 391 mm² | unknown |

| Base Clock | 1386 MHz | null |

| Boost Clock | 1575 MHz | null |

| Memory Clock | 1067 MHz, 8.5 Gbps effective | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective |

| Memory Size | 128 GB | 24 GB |

| Memory Type | LPDDR5X | GDDR6 |

| Memory Bus Width | 256 bit | 192 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | 273.2 GB/s | 432.0 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 2560 | 6144 |

| TMUs | 80 | 192 |

| ROPs | 32 | 96 |

| Ray Tracing Cores | 20 | null |

| Tensor Cores | 96 | null |

| Pixel Rate | 50.40 GPixel/s | 192.0 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 126.0 GTexel/s | 384.0 GTexel/s |

| FP32 Performance | 8.064 TFLOPS | 24.58 TFLOPS |

| FP16 Performance | 8.064 TFLOPS (1:1) | 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| TDP | 120 W | 225 W |

| Slot Width | IGP | Dual-slot |

| Power Connectors | None | 1x 16-pin |

| Suggested PSU | 300 W | 550 W |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 5.0 x8 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |

| Display Outputs | No outputs | 4x DisplayPort 1.4a |

| DirectX Support | N/A | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |

| OpenGL Support | N/A | 4.6 |

| Vulkan Support | N/A | 1.3 |

| Length | 87 mm, 3.4 inches | 268 mm, 10.6 inches |

| Height | 100 mm, 3.9 inches | 112 mm, 4.4 inches |

| Width | 15 mm, 0.6 inches | 40 mm, 1.6 inches |

| Release Date | 2025-08-26 | 2026-03-16 |

| Predecessor | Server Hopper | null |

| Successor | Server Rubin | null |

| Launch MSRP | 2,999 USD | null |