NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 vs Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 Comparison

The Verdict

The recorded data presents an unusual comparison. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 is a fully benchmarked, high-end consumer graphics card with an average benchmark score of 79,842 and a percentile rank of 92 among all GPUs. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100, by contrast, has no recorded benchmark scores, an average benchmark score of zero, and a percentile rank of 50. The database contains no head-to-head benchmark results, and the win count is zero for both parts.

For the RTX 5090, the data indicates a clear performance tier: it sits at the 92nd percentile, and its nearest rivals in the database are the NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB (average score 79,605, 0.3% behind), the NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB (average score 79,396, 0.6% behind), the AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT (average score 78,940, 1.1% behind), and the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X (average score 80,959, 1.4% ahead). These deltas are all within a narrow 2.5% band, meaning the RTX 5090’s average score is statistically comparable to those professional and mobile parts in this particular aggregate metric.

The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100, however, presents no comparable benchmark data. Its architecture is labeled “TrueGPU,” it uses a 7G106 chip, and it carries a 50th percentile rank, but without any recorded scores, the database cannot place it relative to any other product. Any user selecting between these two cards would be making a decision based entirely on specifications, not measured performance.

The verdict from the data is straightforward: the RTX 5090 is the only option with verified benchmark results, and it belongs to the top tier of all GPUs in the database. The LX 7G100 is an unverified product with a lower percentile rank, a smaller memory pool, and a less capable interface. For any workload where measured performance matters, the RTX 5090 is the data-backed choice. The LX 7G100 remains a specification-only entry with no evidence of its real-world capabilities.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 5090 wins in every category where the database records a benchmark score. Its individual test results include 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 at 18,355, Geekbench OpenCL at 334,370, Geekbench Vulkan at 376,728, Passmark DirectX 10 at 226, Passmark DirectX 11 at 341, Passmark DirectX 12 at 185, Passmark DirectX 9 at 395, Passmark G2D at 1,413, Passmark G3D at 39,650, and Passmark GPU Compute at 26,756. The LX 7G100 has no entries in any of these tests, so the database records zero wins for it.

Where the LX 7G100 could claim an advantage is strictly in specification space, not in measured output. Its memory clock runs at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective), which is higher than the RTX 5090’s 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective). However, the effective data rate of the RTX 5090 is higher. The LX 7G100 also uses a 6 nm process node compared to the RTX 5090’s 5 nm node, and it draws 225 W versus 575 W. None of these specifications translate into a benchmark win because no benchmark data exists for the LX 7G100.

The use-case split, therefore, is asymmetric. For any application that relies on the recorded benchmark suite, the RTX 5090 is the only part with evidence. For applications that favor lower power draw, a smaller physical footprint, or a 4x DisplayPort 1.4a output configuration, the LX 7G100 offers those traits on paper. But the database cannot confirm that the LX 7G100 delivers acceptable performance in any of those scenarios, as its average benchmark score is zero.

Architecture Differences

The two cards diverge sharply in architecture. The RTX 5090 uses the GB202 chip built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture, fabricated by TSMC on a 5 nm process. It packs 92,200 million transistors into a 750 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 122.9 million per square millimeter. The LX 7G100 uses the 7G106 chip on the “TrueGPU” architecture, also fabricated by TSMC but on a 6 nm process. Its transistor count and die size are listed as unknown, so no density figure exists.

Core configurations differ substantially. The RTX 5090 has 21,760 shading units, 680 texture mapping units, 176 render output units, 170 ray tracing cores, and 680 tensor cores. The LX 7G100 has 6,144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 96 render output units. It has no recorded ray tracing cores or tensor cores. The RTX 5090’s pixel rate is 423.6 GPixel/s and its texture rate is 1,636.8 GTexel/s. The LX 7G100’s pixel rate is 192.0 GPixel/s and its texture rate is 384.0 GTexel/s.

Compute throughput also separates the two. The RTX 5090 delivers 104.8 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16, with a 1:1 ratio. The LX 7G100 delivers 24.58 TFLOPS for FP32 and 49.15 TFLOPS for FP16, with a 2:1 ratio. The RTX 5090’s FP32 figure is more than four times the LX 7G100’s, and its FP16 figure is roughly double.

Memory architecture is another major divider. The RTX 5090 uses 32 GB of GDDR7 on a 512-bit bus, with 1.79 TB/s of bandwidth. The LX 7G100 uses 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, with 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The RTX 5090’s memory size is 2.67 times larger, and its bandwidth is 4.14 times higher. The memory clock on the LX 7G100 is 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective), while the RTX 5090’s is 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective). The effective data rate favors the RTX 5090 despite the lower base clock.

Interface and output differences are present as well. The RTX 5090 uses PCIe 5.0 x16, while the LX 7G100 uses PCIe 4.0 x16. Display outputs differ: the RTX 5090 has 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b, while the LX 7G100 has 4x DisplayPort 1.4a. API support is close, with both supporting DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The RTX 5090 supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX 7G100 supports Vulkan 1.3.

Power and physical specifications also differ. The RTX 5090 has a TDP of 575 W, uses a single 16-pin connector, and suggests a 950 W power supply. The LX 7G100 has a TDP of 225 W, uses a single 8-pin connector, and suggests a 550 W power supply. Both are dual-slot cards. The RTX 5090 is 304 mm long, 137 mm tall, and 40 mm wide. The LX 7G100 is 294 mm long, 120 mm tall, and 49 mm wide. The LX 7G100 is shorter and shorter, but thicker.

Release timing is also distinct. The RTX 5090 was released on January 29, 2025, with a launch MSRP of 1,999 USD. The LX 7G100 is dated June 17, 2026, with no launch MSRP recorded. The RTX 5090 has a predecessor (GeForce 40) and a successor (GeForce 60), while the LX 7G100 has neither.

FAQ

Q: Which card has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 has an average benchmark score of 79,842. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has an average benchmark score of zero, as no benchmarks are recorded for it.

Q: How much memory does each card have, and what type?

A: The RTX 5090 has 32 GB of GDDR7 on a 512-bit bus with 1.79 TB/s bandwidth. The LX 7G100 has 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What are the FP32 compute figures?

A: The RTX 5090 delivers 104.8 TFLOPS for FP32. The LX 7G100 delivers 24.58 TFLOPS for FP32, which is less than a quarter of the RTX 5090’s figure.

Q: Which card supports more display outputs?

A: The LX 7G100 has 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs. The RTX 5090 has 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b outputs, for a total of four outputs as well.

Q: What are the power requirements?

A: The RTX 5090 has a TDP of 575 W and suggests a 950 W power supply. The LX 7G100 has a TDP of 225 W and suggests a 550 W power supply.

Q: Does the LX 7G100 have ray tracing cores?

A: The database does not list ray tracing cores or tensor cores for the LX 7G100. The RTX 5090 has 170 ray tracing cores and 680 tensor cores.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no head-to-head benchmark results between the RTX 5090 and the LX 7G100. The head-to-head array is empty, and the win count is zero for both parts. As a result, there are no direct comparisons to walk through in this section.

What can be examined instead is the RTX 5090’s position relative to its nearest rivals, as recorded in the database. Its average score of 79,842 is 0.3% ahead of the NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB (79,605), 0.6% ahead of the NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB (79,396), and 1.1% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT (78,940). It is 1.4% behind the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X (80,959). These deltas are small, placing the RTX 5090 in a tight cluster with those products in the aggregate metric.

Individual benchmark results for the RTX 5090 show its strengths. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 376,728 is higher than the Geekbench OpenCL score of 334,370, indicating a 12.7% advantage for the Vulkan path in that test. The Passmark G3D score of 39,650 is far higher than the Passmark GPU Compute score of 26,756, a 48.2% difference. The DirectX tests show a range: DirectX 9 scores 395, DirectX 11 scores 341, DirectX 10 scores 226, and DirectX 12 scores 185. The G2D score is 1,413.

For the LX 7G100, no such analysis is possible. Its benchmark array is empty, its average score is zero, and it has no nearest rivals listed. The data cannot confirm any performance level for this card, and no comparative statements can be made beyond its specification sheet.

The biggest wins, therefore, all belong to the RTX 5090, but only in the sense that it has recorded scores where the LX 7G100 has none. The RTX 5090’s FP32 compute of 104.8 TFLOPS versus 24.58 TFLOPS is a 4.26x advantage. Its memory bandwidth of 1.79 TB/s versus 432.0 GB/s is a 4.14x advantage. Its texture rate of 1,636.8 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel/s is a 4.26x advantage. Its pixel rate of 423.6 GPixel/s versus 192.0 GPixel/s is a 2.21x advantage. These specification deltas are all in the RTX 5090’s favor.

Specification Differences

The two cards differ across nearly every specification field where data is recorded.

Process and die: The RTX 5090 uses a 5 nm TSMC process with 92,200 million transistors on a 750 mm² die, density 122.9M / mm². The LX 7G100 uses a 6 nm TSMC process with unknown transistor count and die size.

Clocks: The RTX 5090 has a base clock of 2017 MHz and a boost clock of 2407 MHz. The LX 7G100 has no base or boost clock recorded. Memory clock: RTX 5090 at 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective), LX 7G100 at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective).

Memory: RTX 5090 has 32 GB GDDR7, 512-bit bus, 1.79 TB/s. LX 7G100 has 12 GB GDDR6, 192-bit bus, 432.0 GB/s.

Core counts: RTX 5090 has 21,760 shading units, 680 TMUs, 176 ROPs, 170 RT cores, 680 tensor cores. LX 7G100 has 6,144 shading units, 192 TMUs, 96 ROPs, no RT cores or tensor cores recorded.

Rates: RTX 5090: pixel rate 423.6 GPixel/s, texture rate 1,636.8 GTexel/s. LX 7G100: pixel rate 192.0 GPixel/s, texture rate 384.0 GTexel/s.

Compute: RTX 5090: FP32 104.8 TFLOPS, FP16 104.8 TFLOPS (1:1). LX 7G100: FP32 24.58 TFLOPS, FP16 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1).

Power: RTX 5090: TDP 575 W, 1x 16-pin connector, suggested PSU 950 W. LX 7G100: TDP 225 W, 1x 8-pin connector, suggested PSU 550 W.

Slot and dimensions: Both are dual-slot. RTX 5090: 304 mm length, 137 mm height, 40 mm width. LX 7G100: 294 mm length, 120 mm height, 49 mm width.

Bus interface: RTX 5090 uses PCIe 5.0 x16. LX 7G100 uses PCIe 4.0 x16.

Display outputs: RTX 5090 has 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b. LX 7G100 has 4x DisplayPort 1.4a.

API support: Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. RTX 5090 supports Vulkan 1.4. LX 7G100 supports Vulkan 1.3.

Release and status: RTX 5090 released January 29, 2025, production status Active, predecessor GeForce 40, successor GeForce 60, launch MSRP 1,999 USD. LX 7G100 released June 17, 2026, production status Active, no predecessor or successor, no launch MSRP recorded.

The specification differences are extensive and consistently favor the RTX 5090 in compute, memory, and interface capabilities. The LX 7G100 counters only with a smaller power draw, a thinner profile in height and length, and a higher memory clock figure, though its effective data rate is lower.