NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 vs Lisuan Tech LX PRO Comparison

The Verdict

The database records a single benchmark result for the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2: a score of 16504 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, with an average benchmark score of 0. The data therefore indicates that the RTX 5090 D V2 is the only one of the two with measurable performance data available.

For the RTX 5090 D V2, the nearest rivals in the database provide context. The NVIDIA T400 scores 16508, a delta of 0% from the RTX 5090 D V2. The AMD Radeon PRO W7500 scores 16415, which is 0.5% behind. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell scores 16408, 0.6% behind. The AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT scores 16361, 0.9% behind. These deltas place the RTX 5090 D V2 in a tight cluster with those cards, despite the massive architectural differences that will be detailed later.

The Lisuan Tech LX PRO sits at the 50th percentile among all GPUs in the database, while the RTX 5090 D V2 sits at the 59th percentile. That percentile gap is small, but the absence of any actual benchmark score for the LX PRO means the percentile figure is not backed by measurable performance data. Users seeking a card with verified performance records should consider the RTX 5090 D V2, as the LX PRO cannot be evaluated from the recorded measurements.

Architecture Differences

The two cards come from different architectural lineages. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 uses the GB202 chip, built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture, fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO uses the 7G105 chip, built on the TrueGPU architecture, fabricated on a 6 nm process, also at TSMC. The process node difference is one nanometer, but the transistor data tells a more complex story: the RTX 5090 D V2 packs 92,200 million transistors on a 750 mm² die, yielding a density of 122.9M per mm². The LX PRO's transistor count and die size are both recorded as unknown, so a direct density comparison is impossible from the data.

The shading unit counts diverge sharply. The RTX 5090 D V2 has 21,760 shading units, 680 texture mapping units, and 176 raster operation pipelines. The LX PRO has 6,144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. The RTX 5090 D V2 also carries 170 RT cores and 680 tensor cores, while the LX PRO has no recorded RT core or tensor core counts. That absence suggests the LX PRO may not have dedicated ray tracing or AI acceleration hardware, though the data does not explicitly confirm this.

The memory subsystems differ in both type and configuration. The RTX 5090 D V2 uses 24 GB of GDDR7 on a 384-bit bus, delivering 1.34 TB/s of bandwidth. The LX PRO also has 24 GB, but it is GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, with 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The RTX 5090 D V2's memory bandwidth is more than three times that of the LX PRO, a gap that likely influences performance in memory-intensive workloads.

Clock speeds are recorded differently. The RTX 5090 D V2 has a base clock of 2017 MHz and a boost clock of 2407 MHz. The LX PRO has no base or boost clock recorded, only a memory clock of 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). The RTX 5090 D V2's memory clock is 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective). The effective memory speed difference is substantial, with the RTX 5090 D V2 running at 28 Gbps versus 18 Gbps for the LX PRO.

The bus interface also differs: the RTX 5090 D V2 uses PCIe 5.0 x16, while the LX PRO uses PCIe 4.0 x16. Display outputs vary as well. The RTX 5090 D V2 offers 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b. The LX PRO offers 4x DisplayPort 1.4a, with no HDMI port recorded. API support is nearly identical, with both cards supporting DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The RTX 5090 D V2 supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX PRO supports Vulkan 1.3.

Where Each One Wins

With no benchmark scores recorded for the LX PRO, the data cannot show any workload where it wins. The RTX 5090 D V2 has a single benchmark result, which serves as its only recorded performance data point. That score of 16504 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 represents a synthetic gaming workload, but no other tests exist in the database for this card.

The RTX 5090 D V2's specifications suggest strengths in compute-heavy tasks. Its FP32 throughput is 104.8 TFLOPS, and its FP16 throughput is also 104.8 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio. The LX PRO delivers 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 and 49.15 TFLOPS FP16 with a 2:1 ratio. In raw FP32 compute, the RTX 5090 D V2 is roughly four times faster. In FP16, it is roughly twice as fast. The pixel rate for the RTX 5090 D V2 is 423.6 GPixel/s versus 192.0 GPixel/s for the LX PRO. The texture rate is 1,636.8 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel/s.

The power envelope tells a different story. The RTX 5090 D V2 has a TDP of 575 W and a suggested PSU of 950 W. The LX PRO has a TDP of 225 W and a suggested PSU of 550 W. The LX PRO consumes less than half the power of the RTX 5090 D V2, which could make it suitable for systems with lower power budgets, but no performance data exists to confirm whether that efficiency translates into competitive results.

Physical dimensions differ as well. The RTX 5090 D V2 measures 304 mm in length, 137 mm in height, and 48 mm in width. The LX PRO measures 248 mm in length, 118 mm in height, and 48 mm in width. The LX PRO is shorter and slightly less tall, which may fit smaller cases. Both are dual-slot cards with a single 16-pin power connector.

FAQ

Q: Which card has a recorded benchmark score?

A: Only the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 has a recorded benchmark score in the database. It scored 16504 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has no benchmark scores recorded, with an average score of 0.

Q: How does the RTX 5090 D V2 compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The RTX 5090 D V2 scores 16504. The NVIDIA T400 scores 16508, which is a 0% delta. The AMD Radeon PRO W7500 scores 16415, 0.5% behind. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell scores 16408, 0.6% behind. The AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT scores 16361, 0.9% behind.

Q: What are the memory differences between the two cards?

A: The RTX 5090 D V2 uses 24 GB of GDDR7 on a 384-bit bus with 1.34 TB/s bandwidth. The LX PRO also has 24 GB, but it is GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. The RTX 5090 D V2's effective memory speed is 28 Gbps, while the LX PRO's is 18 Gbps.

Q: Does the LX PRO have ray tracing cores?

A: The database does not record any RT core count for the LX PRO. The RTX 5090 D V2 has 170 RT cores and 680 tensor cores. The absence of recorded RT cores for the LX PRO suggests it may lack dedicated ray tracing hardware, but the data does not explicitly confirm this.

Q: What is the power requirement difference?

A: The RTX 5090 D V2 has a TDP of 575 W and a suggested PSU of 950 W. The LX PRO has a TDP of 225 W and a suggested PSU of 550 W. The LX PRO requires a smaller power supply and draws less power.

Q: What is the release date difference?

A: The RTX 5090 D V2 was released on 2025-08-14, with a launch MSRP of 2,299 USD. The LX PRO was released on 2026-03-16, and no launch MSRP is recorded for it.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database lists no head-to-head benchmark results between the RTX 5090 D V2 and the LX PRO. The win counts for both cards are zero. This means no direct comparison can be made from actual measured performance data.

The only available benchmark score belongs to the RTX 5090 D V2: 16504 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12. That score places it at the 59th percentile among all GPUs in the database. The LX PRO has no scores, yet its percentile is recorded as 50. This discrepancy suggests the percentile for the LX PRO is not derived from benchmark measurements, since an average score of 0 would normally place it at the bottom of any distribution.

The nearest rival comparisons for the RTX 5090 D V2 show how tightly clustered its score is with other cards. The NVIDIA T400 is effectively tied at 16508, a delta of 0%. The AMD Radeon PRO W7500 trails by 0.5%, the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell by 0.6%, and the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT by 0.9%. These deltas are within a single percentage point, indicating that the RTX 5090 D V2's benchmark performance is not an outlier in this group.

The specification gap between the two cards is enormous, however. The RTX 5090 D V2 has 21760 shading units versus 6144 for the LX PRO, a ratio of roughly 3.5 to 1. Its FP32 throughput of 104.8 TFLOPS is more than four times the LX PRO's 24.58 TFLOPS. Its bandwidth of 1.34 TB/s is more than three times the LX PRO's 432.0 GB/s. These differences would likely produce a large performance gap in most workloads, but without LX PRO benchmark data, that gap cannot be quantified.

Specification Differences

The two cards differ in nearly every specification category recorded in the database.

Chip and architecture: The RTX 5090 D V2 uses the GB202 chip on Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The LX PRO uses the 7G105 chip on TrueGPU architecture.

Process node: The RTX 5090 D V2 is on 5 nm. The LX PRO is on 6 nm.

Transistors: The RTX 5090 D V2 has 92,200 million transistors on a 750 mm² die. The LX PRO's transistor count and die size are unknown.

Transistor density: The RTX 5090 D V2 has 122.9M transistors per mm². The LX PRO has no recorded density.

Clocks: The RTX 5090 D V2 has a base clock of 2017 MHz and a boost clock of 2407 MHz. The LX PRO has no base or boost clock recorded. Memory clock is 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective) for the RTX 5090 D V2 and 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) for the LX PRO.

Memory: Both have 24 GB, but the RTX 5090 D V2 uses GDDR7 on a 384-bit bus with 1.34 TB/s bandwidth. The LX PRO uses GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Shading units: 21,760 for the RTX 5090 D V2 versus 6,144 for the LX PRO.

TMUs: 680 for the RTX 5090 D V2 versus 192 for the LX PRO.

ROPs: 176 for the RTX 5090 D V2 versus 96 for the LX PRO.

RT cores: 170 for the RTX 5090 D V2. None recorded for the LX PRO.

Tensor cores: 680 for the RTX 5090 D V2. None recorded for the LX PRO.

Pixel rate: 423.6 GPixel/s for the RTX 5090 D V2 versus 192.0 GPixel/s for the LX PRO.

Texture rate: 1,636.8 GTexel/s for the RTX 5090 D V2 versus 384.0 GTexel/s for the LX PRO.

FP32: 104.8 TFLOPS for the RTX 5090 D V2 versus 24.58 TFLOPS for the LX PRO.

FP16: 104.8 TFLOPS (1:1) for the RTX 5090 D V2 versus 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1) for the LX PRO.

TDP: 575 W for the RTX 5090 D V2 versus 225 W for the LX PRO.

Suggested PSU: 950 W for the RTX 5090 D V2 versus 550 W for the LX PRO.

Bus interface: PCIe 5.0 x16 for the RTX 5090 D V2 versus PCIe 4.0 x16 for the LX PRO.

Display outputs: 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b for the RTX 5090 D V2. 4x DisplayPort 1.4a for the LX PRO.

Dimensions: The RTX 5090 D V2 is 304 mm long, 137 mm tall, and 48 mm wide. The LX PRO is 248 mm long, 118 mm tall, and 48 mm wide.

Vulkan support: 1.4 for the RTX 5090 D V2 versus 1.3 for the LX PRO.

Release date: 2025-08-14 for the RTX 5090 D V2 versus 2026-03-16 for the LX PRO.

Launch MSRP: 2,299 USD for the RTX 5090 D V2. No MSRP recorded for the LX PRO.