NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER vs NVIDIA Jetson T4000 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons between the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER and the NVIDIA Jetson T4000. The head-to-head results table is empty, and neither product has a shared benchmark entry that would allow a direct side-by-side score comparison. This absence of data is itself informative: the two products target entirely different segments, and the database has not logged any common test scenario where both were measured.

The RTX 5080 SUPER does have a single recorded benchmark result. In the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, it scores 3075 points. This places it in the 19th percentile of all GPUs in the database, meaning roughly 81 percent of recorded graphics cards score higher. Its nearest rivals in the database, based on average benchmark scores, are the NVIDIA Quadro P1000 at 3163 points (2.8 percent higher), the Intel Arc Pro B60 at 3182 points (3.4 percent higher), the NVIDIA GeForce 820A at 2983 points (3.1 percent lower), and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M at 2967 points (3.6 percent lower). These deltas are tight: the RTX 5080 SUPER sits within a 3.6 percent band of its nearest competitors, a clustering that suggests the Steel Nomad workload may not be the optimal expression of its architecture.

The Jetson T4000 has no benchmark entries in the database. Its average benchmark score is recorded as zero, and it has no nearest rivals listed. This means the database offers no comparative performance data for the Jetson T4000, and any analysis of its compute capabilities must rely on its architectural specifications rather than measured results. The percentile field shows 50, but with no score behind it, this percentile cannot be interpreted as a performance position; it likely reflects the absence of data rather than a mid-pack ranking.

Architecture Differences

The two NVIDIA products share a 5 nm process node and TSMC as the foundry, but their architectures diverge in naming and in implementation details. The RTX 5080 SUPER uses the GB203 chip built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture, part of the GeForce 50 generation. The Jetson T4000 uses the GB10B chip built on the base Blackwell architecture, classified under the Server Blackwell (Bxx) generation. Both are Blackwell-family designs, but the GeForce part carries a newer iteration label, Blackwell 2.0, while the server-oriented part uses the original Blackwell name.

Transistor counts and die sizes show a notable inversion. The RTX 5080 SUPER packs 45,600 million transistors into a 378 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 120.6 million transistors per square millimeter. The Jetson T4000 has an unknown transistor count and a slightly larger die at 391 mm², with no density figure recorded. Despite the larger die, the Jetson T4000 has far fewer active compute resources, which suggests the die area may be used for non-compute logic, memory controllers, or other integrated functions.

Compute unit counts differ by an order of magnitude. The RTX 5080 SUPER has 10,752 shading units, 336 texture mapping units, 112 render output units, 84 ray tracing cores, and 336 tensor cores. The Jetson T4000 has 1,536 shading units, 48 TMUs, 16 ROPs, 12 ray tracing cores, and 64 tensor cores. Pixel and texture rates follow accordingly: the RTX 5080 SUPER reaches 293.1 GPixel/s and 879.3 GTexel/s, while the Jetson T4000 reaches 24.48 GPixel/s and 73.44 GTexel/s. FP32 and FP16 throughput are each 56.28 TFLOPS on the RTX 5080 SUPER, versus 4.700 TFLOPS on the Jetson T4000. The ratios are consistent: roughly 12 times the shading units, 7 times the TMUs, 7 times the ROPs, 7 times the RT cores, and 5.25 times the tensor cores.

Clock speeds favor the GeForce part substantially. The RTX 5080 SUPER runs at a 2295 MHz base and 2617 MHz boost, while the Jetson T4000 is locked at 1530 MHz for both base and boost. Memory clocks diverge as well: 2000 MHz with 32 Gbps effective on the RTX 5080 SUPER versus 1067 MHz with 8.5 Gbps effective on the Jetson T4000.

Memory configurations reflect different design goals. The RTX 5080 SUPER has 24 GB of GDDR7 on a 256 bit bus, delivering 1.02 TB/s of bandwidth. The Jetson T4000 has 64 GB of LPDDR5X, also on a 256 bit bus, but delivers only 273.2 GB/s. The Jetson part has 2.67 times the capacity but less than a third of the bandwidth. The power envelopes tell a similar story: the RTX 5080 SUPER draws 415 W with a 1x 16-pin connector, while the Jetson T4000 draws 90 W with no power connectors and a suggested PSU of 250 W.

The Verdict

The data presents two products that share a manufacturer, a process node, and a family name, but little else. The RTX 5080 SUPER is a discrete, dual-slot graphics card with a 304 mm length, 137 mm height, and 40 mm width, designed for PCIe 5.0 x16, with display outputs (1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b) and full API support including DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The Jetson T4000 is an integrated graphics processor (IGP) with no display outputs, no discrete graphics API support (DirectX N/A, OpenGL N/A, Vulkan N/A), a 87 mm by 100 mm by 15 mm footprint, and PCIe 5.0 x8 connectivity.

Benchmark results only exist for the RTX 5080 SUPER, and its single score of 3075 in Steel Nomad places it near the 19th percentile, within 3.6 percent of several lower-tier rivals. The Jetson T4000 has no recorded benchmarks, so its performance cannot be quantified from the database. The RTX 5080 SUPER's launch MSRP is 999 USD, while the Jetson T4000's launch MSRP is 1,999 USD.

The RTX 5080 SUPER is the only one of the two with measured graphics performance, and it carries the full feature set expected of a modern discrete GPU. The Jetson T4000 trades all graphics output and API compatibility for a 64 GB memory pool, a 90 W power draw, and a server-oriented form factor with no display capability. The database records a predecessor ("Server Hopper") and successor ("Server Rubin") for the Jetson T4000, while the RTX 5080 SUPER has none listed. Release dates are close: the RTX 5080 SUPER on 2025-12-31 and the Jetson T4000 on 2026-01-04.

FAQ

Q: Which product has a higher FP32 compute throughput?

A: The RTX 5080 SUPER records 56.28 TFLOPS FP32, while the Jetson T4000 records 4.700 TFLOPS FP32.

Q: How much memory does each product have, and what type?

A: The RTX 5080 SUPER has 24 GB of GDDR7, while the Jetson T4000 has 64 GB of LPDDR5X.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth difference?

A: The RTX 5080 SUPER delivers 1.02 TB/s, which is 3.73 times the Jetson T4000's 273.2 GB/s.

Q: Does the Jetson T4000 support display outputs?

A: No, the Jetson T4000 lists "No outputs" for display outputs, while the RTX 5080 SUPER has 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b.

Q: What are the power requirements for each?

A: The RTX 5080 SUPER has a 415 W TDP with a 1x 16-pin power connector. The Jetson T4000 has a 90 W TDP with no power connectors and a suggested PSU of 250 W.

Q: Which has a higher boost clock?

A: The RTX 5080 SUPER boosts to 2617 MHz, compared to the Jetson T4000's fixed 1530 MHz boost.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 5080 SUPER wins on every measured compute metric in the database. It has 12 times the shading units (10,752 vs 1,536), 7 times the TMUs (336 vs 48), 7 times the ROPs (112 vs 16), 7 times the ray tracing cores (84 vs 12), and 5.25 times the tensor cores (336 vs 64). Its FP32 throughput of 56.28 TFLOPS is 11.97 times the Jetson T4000's 4.700 TFLOPS. Its pixel rate of 293.1 GPixel/s is 11.98 times higher, and its texture rate of 879.3 GTexel/s is 11.97 times higher. Memory bandwidth of 1.02 TB/s is 3.73 times the Jetson part's 273.2 GB/s. The RTX 5080 SUPER also carries the only recorded benchmark score, a 3075 in Steel Nomad, and it supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, none of which the Jetson T4000 supports.

The Jetson T4000 wins on memory capacity, power efficiency, and physical footprint. Its 64 GB of LPDDR5X is 2.67 times the RTX 5080 SUPER's 24 GB. Its 90 W TDP is 78.3 percent lower than the 415 W TDP of the RTX 5080 SUPER, and it requires no power connectors. Its dimensions (87 mm by 100 mm by 15 mm) are dramatically smaller than the discrete card's 304 mm by 137 mm by 40 mm. The Jetson T4000 also uses the PCIe 5.0 x8 interface versus the RTX 5080 SUPER's PCIe 5.0 x16, which implies a smaller link footprint. It is an IGP form factor, meaning it integrates into a system rather than occupying a slot.

For workloads that need massive memory capacity in a low-power, compact server context, the Jetson T4000's 64 GB pool is the clear advantage. For any workload that requires graphics output, modern API support, or raw shading and ray tracing throughput, the RTX 5080 SUPER dominates according to the recorded specifications.

Specification Differences

The two products differ in nearly every recorded field except manufacturer, process node, foundry, memory bus width, and production status.

| Specification | RTX 5080 SUPER | Jetson T4000 |

|---|---|---|

| Chip | GB203 | GB10B |

| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | Blackwell |

| Generation | GeForce 50 | Server Blackwell (Bxx) |

| Die Size | 378 mm² | 391 mm² |

| Transistors | 45,600 million | unknown |

| Transistor Density | 120.6M / mm² | null |

| Base Clock | 2295 MHz | 1530 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 2617 MHz | 1530 MHz |

| Memory Clock | 2000 MHz, 32 Gbps effective | 1067 MHz, 8.5 Gbps effective |

| Memory Size | 24 GB | 64 GB |

| Memory Type | GDDR7 | LPDDR5X |

| Memory Bandwidth | 1.02 TB/s | 273.2 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 10752 | 1536 |

| TMUs | 336 | 48 |

| ROPs | 112 | 16 |

| Ray Tracing Cores | 84 | 12 |

| Tensor Cores | 336 | 64 |

| Pixel Rate | 293.1 GPixel/s | 24.48 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 879.3 GTexel/s | 73.44 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 56.28 TFLOPS | 4.700 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 56.28 TFLOPS | 4.700 TFLOPS |

| TDP | 415 W | 90 W |

| Slot Width | Dual-slot | IGP |

| Power Connectors | 1x 16-pin | None |

| Suggested PSU | null | 250 W |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 5.0 x16 | PCIe 5.0 x8 |

| Display Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b | No outputs |

| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | N/A |

| OpenGL | 4.6 | N/A |

| Vulkan | 1.4 | N/A |

| Dimensions | 304 mm x 137 mm x 40 mm | 87 mm x 100 mm x 15 mm |

| Release Date | 2025-12-31 | 2026-01-04 |

| Predecessor | null | Server Hopper |

| Successor | null | Server Rubin |

| Launch MSRP | 999 USD | 1,999 USD |

| Benchmark Score | 3075 (Steel Nomad) | none |

| Percentile | 19 | 50 |

| Nearest Rivals | Quadro P1000, GeForce 820A, Arc Pro B60, GTX 860M | none |