AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER Comparison

AMD
RADEON

AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB

CORE STATE Navi 22
VRAM 12 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2581 MHz
TDP 250 W
BUS WIDTH 192 bit
ARCHITECTURE RDNA 2.0
nm
PROCESS 7 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2023
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER

CORE STATE AD104
VRAM 12 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2475 MHz
TDP 220 W
BUS WIDTH 192 bit
ARCHITECTURE Ada Lovelace
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
2,402
4,627
geekbench_vulkan
108,994
205,624
geekbench_opencl
N/A
172,795
passmark_directx_10
N/A
167
passmark_directx_11
N/A
273
passmark_directx_12
N/A
110
passmark_directx_9
N/A
344
passmark_g2d
N/A
1,184
passmark_g3d
N/A
29,995
passmark_gpu_compute
N/A
17,108

Analysis: AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER

Where Each One Wins

The recorded data splits these two cards cleanly along a single axis: the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER wins every head-to-head benchmark in the database, while the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB does not claim a single victory in the comparative tests. That is a one-sided outcome, but it does not mean the AMD card is without a role.

The RX 6750 GRE holds an 87th percentile ranking across all GPUs in the database, while the RTX 4070 SUPER sits at the 83rd percentile. That is an unusual inversion: the card that wins all head-to-head tests ranks lower in the overall percentile system. The explanation lies in the average benchmark score. The AMD card averages 55,698 points, which puts it in the company of the AMD Radeon 8060S (55,757, a 0.1% gap) and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 (56,083, a 0.7% gap). The RTX 4070 SUPER averages 43,223 points, sitting near the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB (43,262, a 0.1% gap) and the RTX 5050 Mobile (43,268, a 0.1% gap). So the AMD card is the stronger all-rounder in the broader database, while the NVIDIA card is the faster card in the specific tests where they meet.

Where each one wins depends on what you are measuring. If the task is the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 workload, the RTX 4070 SUPER wins decisively. If the task is Vulkan compute through Geekbench, it wins again. The RX 6750 GRE wins in the aggregate database average, meaning it holds its own across a wider spread of recorded workloads than the NVIDIA card does. For a builder who cares about a single demanding title or API, the RTX 4070 SUPER is the clear pick. For someone who wants a card that scores well across many different benchmarks, the RX 6750 GRE looks better in the overall statistics.

Architecture Differences

The two cards come from different manufacturing generations and use different underlying designs. The AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB uses the Navi 22 chip built on RDNA 2.0 architecture, fabricated on a 7 nm process at TSMC. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER uses the AD104 chip with Ada Lovelace architecture, built on a 5 nm process, also at TSMC. That process difference is substantial: the NVIDIA chip packs 35,800 million transistors into a 294 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 121.8 million per square millimeter. The AMD chip contains 17,200 million transistors on a larger 335 mm² die, for a density of 51.3 million per square millimeter. The NVIDIA design more than doubles the transistor density, which shows in its raw compute figures.

The compute layout differs sharply. The RX 6750 GRE has 2,560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units, 64 ROPs, and 40 ray tracing cores. It has no tensor cores. The RTX 4070 SUPER has 7,168 shading units, 224 TMUs, 80 ROPs, 56 ray tracing cores, and 224 tensor cores. The NVIDIA card also has a much higher FP32 throughput at 35.48 TFLOPS, compared to 13.21 TFLOPS for the AMD card. FP16 performance tells the same story: NVIDIA runs 35.48 TFLOPS at a 1:1 ratio, while AMD reaches 26.43 TFLOPS but only at a 2:1 ratio. The NVIDIA card is not just faster in clocked compute, it is faster per clock and has far more execution units.

Memory is another divider. Both cards have 12 GB and a 192 bit bus, but the NVIDIA card uses GDDR6X at 21 Gbps effective, delivering 504.2 GB/s of bandwidth. The AMD card uses GDDR6 at 18 Gbps effective, delivering 432.0 GB/s. The NVIDIA card also has a higher memory clock at 1313 MHz versus 2250 MHz for the AMD card, though the effective data rate is what matters for bandwidth, and NVIDIA leads there too.

Power and physical design also differ. The AMD card is rated at 250 W TDP with a 600 W suggested PSU and a 1x 6-pin plus 1x 8-pin power connector setup. The NVIDIA card draws less at 220 W TDP, with a 550 W suggested PSU and a single 16-pin connector. Both are dual-slot cards. The AMD card measures 267 mm long, 110 mm tall, and 40 mm wide. The NVIDIA card is the same 267 mm length, but 112 mm tall and 42 mm wide. The AMD card is slightly thinner and shorter in height.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database records two direct comparisons between these cards, and the RTX 4070 SUPER wins both by large margins.

In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the NVIDIA card scores 4,627 points against 2,402 for the AMD card. That is a delta of 48.1% in favor of the RTX 4070 SUPER. In practical terms, the NVIDIA card delivers nearly double the performance in this modern DX12 workload. This is the kind of result that matters for a current-generation gaming load, and it is not close.

In Geekbench Vulkan, the NVIDIA card scores 205,624 points against 108,994 for the AMD card, a delta of 47%. Again, the NVIDIA card is roughly twice as fast. The AMD card's Vulkan score is less than half of what the NVIDIA card achieves. These two tests, one DX12 and one Vulkan, cover the two major modern graphics APIs, and the RTX 4070 SUPER dominates both.

The AMD card does have a higher average benchmark score overall, 55,698 versus 43,223, which is a 12,475 point difference in the AMD card's favor. That average includes many more tests than the two head-to-head comparisons, so it reflects a broader set of workloads, including legacy DirectX tests and compute tests. The RTX 4070 SUPER has a wider range of recorded benchmarks in the database, including PassMark DirectX 10 through DirectX 12, PassMark G2D, PassMark G3D, and PassMark GPU compute, plus Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan. The AMD card has only two recorded benchmarks in its own entry, which is fewer data points feeding into its average.

The production status differs as well. The RX 6750 GRE is listed as Active and was released on 2023-10-16, with a launch MSRP of 334 USD, and its predecessor is listed as Navi with a successor of Navi III. The RTX 4070 SUPER is listed as End-of-life, released on 2024-01-17, with a launch MSRP of 599 USD, a predecessor of GeForce 30, and a successor of GeForce 50. NVIDIA lists more details in its API support, and both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

FAQ

Q: Which card is faster in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, and by how much?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER wins with 4,627 points against 2,402 for the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB, a 48.1% difference in favor of NVIDIA.

Q: Does the AMD card win any head-to-head benchmark in the database?

A: No. The RX 6750 GRE has zero wins in the head-to-head comparisons, with the RTX 4070 SUPER winning both the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test and the Geekbench Vulkan test.

Q: Which card has higher overall average benchmark score, and what does that mean for buyers?

A The RX 6750 GRE averages 55,698 points, which places it near the AMD Radeon 8060S (55,757 points, 0.1% gap) and the NVIDIA RTX 5080 (56,083 points, 0.7% gap). The RTX 4070 SUPER averages 43,223 points, near the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB (43,262 points, 0.1% gap). So the AMD card ranks higher in the broader database average.

Q: What is the memory configuration difference between the two cards?

A Both have 12 GB and a 192 bit bus, but the NVIDIA card uses GDDR6X at 21 Gbps effective with 504.2 GB/s bandwidth, while the AMD card uses GDDR6 at 18 Gbps effective with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Which card is smaller?

A Both are 267 mm long and dual-slot, but the AMD card is 110 mm tall and 40 mm wide, while the NVIDIA card is 112 mm tall and 42 mm wide.

Q: Which card has tensor cores?

A The RTX 4070 SUPER has 224 tensor cores, while the RX 6750 GRE has none.

The Verdict

Pick the RTX 4070 SUPER if you care about modern frame rates in DX12 and Vulkan workloads. The data is unambiguous: 48.1% ahead in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 and 47% ahead in Geekbench Vulkan. It is also the more efficient card at 220 W TDP with a 550 W suggested PSU, versus 250 W and 600 W for AMD, and it comes with a lower launch MSRP of 599 USD compared to 334 USD.

Pick the RX 6750 GRE if you want a card that scores higher in the database's overall average benchmark average. It holds an 87th percentile rank against all GPUs, with an average score of 55,698 that sits within 1% of the RTX 5080 and the Radeon 8060S. The RTX 4070 SUPER SUPER's own average is 43,223 points, a 12,475 point gap below the AMD card.

The RTX 8070 Super's 83rd percentile ranking is below the AMD card despite its head-to-head wins, so the AMD card is the better all-rounder in the recorded data, even if it loses every direct comparison.

Specification Differences

  • Process node: AMD Navi 22 on 7 nm versus NVIDIA AD104 on 5 nm
  • Transistors 17,200 million versus 35,800 million
  • Die size 335 mm² versus 294 mm²
  • Transistor density 51.3M / mm² versus 121.8M / mm²
  • Shading units 2,560 versus 7,168
  • TMUs 160 versus 224
  • ROPs 64 versus 80
  • RT cores 40 versus 56
  • Tensor cores none versus 224
  • FP32 13.21 TFLOPS 165.2 GPixel/s versus 198.0 GPixel/s
  • Texture rate 413.0 GTexel/s versus 554.4 GTexel/s
  • FP16 26.43 TFLOPS (2:1) versus 35.48 TFLOPS (1:1) 35.48 TFLOPS (1:1)
  • Memory clock 2250 MHz 18 Gbps effective versus 1313 MHz 21 Gbps effective
  • Memory type GDDR6 versus GDDR6X
  • Bandwidth 432.0 GB/s versus 504.2 GB/s
  • TDP 250 W versus 220 W
  • Power connectors 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin versus 1x 16-pin
  • Suggested PSU 600 W versus 550 W
  • Length 267 mm versus 267 mm
  • Height 110 mm versus 112 mm
  • Width 40 mm versus 42 mm

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
RX 6750 GRE 12 GB
RTX 4070 SUPER
Core Specs
Shading Units
2,560
7,168 +180.0%
Shaders
2,560
7,168 +180.0%
TMUs
160
224 +40.0%
ROPs
64
80 +25.0%
Compute Units
40
—
SM Count
—
56
Clocks
Base Clock
2321 MHz
1980 MHz
Boost Clock
2581 MHz
2475 MHz
Game Clock
2439 MHz
—
Memory Clock
2250 MHz 18 Gbps effective
1313 MHz 21 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
12 GB
12 GB
VRAM (MB)
12,288
12,288 0.0%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6X
Memory Bus
192 bit
192 bit
Bandwidth
432.0 GB/s
504.2 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
128 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
3 MB
48 MB
L3 Cache
96 MB
—
L0 Cache
32 KB per WGP
—
Performance
Pixel Rate
165.2 GPixel/s
198.0 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
413.0 GTexel/s
554.4 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
13.21 TFLOPS
35.48 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
825.9 GFLOPS (1:16)
554.4 GFLOPS (1:64)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
26.43 TFLOPS (2:1)
35.48 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
40
56 +40.0%
Tensor Cores
—
224
Power
TDP
250 W
220 W
TDP (W)
250
220 -12.0%
Suggested PSU
600 W
550 W
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
1x 16-pin
Architecture
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
Ada Lovelace
GPU Name
Navi 22
AD104
Generation
Navi II (RX 6000)
GeForce 40
Process Size
7 nm
5 nm
Transistors
17,200 million
35,800 million
Die Size
335 mm²
294 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
TSMC
Density
51.3M / mm²
121.8M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
2.1
3.0
CUDA
—
8.9
Shader Model
6.8
6.9
Physical
Slot Width
Dual-slot
Dual-slot
Length
267 mm 10.5 inches
267 mm 10.5 inches
Height
110 mm 4.3 inches
112 mm 4.4 inches
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 1.4a
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
PCIe 4.0 x16
Other
Launch Price
334 USD
599 USD
Production
Active
End-of-life
Predecessor
Navi
GeForce 30
Successor
Navi III
GeForce 50
View Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB Details View GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER Details