NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile vs Lisuan Tech LX PRO Comparison

Where Each One Wins

The data presents a stark contrast between these two GPUs. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile is a well-documented mobile part with a complete benchmark profile, while the Lisuan Tech LX PRO has no recorded benchmark scores in the database. The RTX 5070 Mobile holds every measurable performance win by default, as the LX PRO has an empty benchmark array and a zero average score. The database records the RTX 5070 Mobile at the 75th percentile among all GPUs, whereas the LX PRO sits at the 50th percentile, a position that reflects its lack of tested performance rather than any demonstrated capability.

The RTX 5070 Mobile wins every workload category where data exists. Its Geekbench OpenCL score of 122,238 and Vulkan score of 116,960 indicate strong compute and graphics throughput. The PassMark suite shows the RTX 5070 Mobile delivering 20,355 in G3D, 8,279 in GPU compute, and DirectX scores of 214 (DX9), 192 (DX11), 129 (DX10), and 93 (DX12). The LX PRO cannot be positioned against these numbers because no test results are recorded for it. The use-case split is therefore one-sided: for any application where benchmark data exists, the RTX 5070 Mobile is the only contender with verified performance.

The architectural positioning reinforces this split. The RTX 5070 Mobile belongs to the GeForce 50-series with a Blackwell 2.0 architecture, a mature ecosystem with full API support including DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The LX PRO uses a TrueGPU architecture with Vulkan 1.3 support, one minor version behind, and its DirectX and OpenGL support match the RTX 5070 Mobile. However, the LX PRO lacks the ray tracing and tensor core hardware that the RTX 5070 Mobile includes, making the NVIDIA part the only one with dedicated hardware for those workloads.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs diverge fundamentally in their construction. The RTX 5070 Mobile uses the GB206 chip on a 5 nm TSMC process with 21,900 million transistors packed into a 181 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 121.0 million per square millimeter. The LX PRO uses the 7G105 chip on a 6 nm TSMC process, also from TSMC, but its transistor count and die size are recorded as unknown. The process node difference is modest, 5 nm versus 6 nm, but the RTX 5070 Mobile's transistor count is explicitly documented while the LX PRO's remains unspecified.

The compute resources differ sharply. The LX PRO fields 6,144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 96 raster output units, all higher than the RTX 5070 Mobile's 4,608 shading units, 144 TMUs, and 48 ROPs. The LX PRO also delivers higher raw throughput: 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 versus 13.13 TFLOPS for the RTX 5070 Mobile, and 49.15 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1 ratio) versus 13.13 TFLOPS FP16 (1:1 ratio). Pixel rate and texture rate follow the same pattern, with the LX PRO at 192.0 GPixel/s and 384.0 GTexel/s compared to the RTX 5070 Mobile's 68.40 GPixel/s and 205.2 GTexel/s. These numbers indicate the LX PRO was designed for raw compute throughput, but the RTX 5070 Mobile counters with dedicated ray tracing cores (36) and tensor cores (144) that the LX PRO lacks entirely.

Memory configurations also differ. The RTX 5070 Mobile uses 8 GB of GDDR7 on a 128-bit bus with 384.0 GB/s bandwidth, while the LX PRO uses 24 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. The LX PRO has three times the capacity and 12.5% more bandwidth, but the RTX 5070 Mobile uses newer GDDR7 memory with a higher effective speed of 24 Gbps versus 18 Gbps. The clock specifications diverge as well: the RTX 5070 Mobile records a base clock of 907 MHz and a boost clock of 1425 MHz, while the LX PRO has no base or boost clock recorded in the database.

Power and physical characteristics separate them further. The RTX 5070 Mobile is an integrated GPU with a 50 W TDP, no power connectors, and a slot width of IGP. The LX PRO is a dual-slot discrete card with a 225 W TDP, a single 16-pin power connector, a suggested 550 W PSU, and dimensions of 248 mm length, 118 mm height, and 48 mm width. The RTX 5070 Mobile relies on PCIe 5.0 x16, while the LX PRO uses PCIe 4.0 x16. Display outputs also differ: the RTX 5070 Mobile is portable device dependent, while the LX PRO provides 4x DisplayPort 1.4a.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head benchmark array in the database is empty, meaning no direct comparative tests exist between these two GPUs. The RTX 5070 Mobile's nine individual benchmark scores stand alone, and the LX PRO has no scores recorded at all. The nearest rivals for the RTX 5070 Mobile provide context for its performance level. The database shows the RTX 5070 Mobile with an average benchmark score of 29,928, placing it 0.1% below the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti (29,945), 0.5% above the RTX 2080 Ti (29,783), 0.6% below the AMD Radeon RX 6800 (30,095), and 1.7% below the AMD Radeon RX 6700 (30,433). These deltas are tiny, indicating the RTX 5070 Mobile performs within a narrow band of those established desktop GPUs.

The largest recorded win for the RTX 5070 Mobile comes from its Geekbench OpenCL score of 122,238, which is 4.5% higher than its Vulkan score of 116,960. In the PassMark suite, the G3D score of 20,355 dominates the DirectX scores, with DX9 (214) leading DX11 (192), DX10 (129), and DX12 (93). The GPU compute score of 8,279 and the 2D score of 896 round out the profile. The LX PRO has no comparable figures, so no cross-GPU deltas can be calculated. The data indicates that the RTX 5070 Mobile is a balanced performer across compute and graphics workloads, but the LX PRO exists only as a specification sheet without tested results.

The power envelope difference is substantial. The RTX 5070 Mobile draws 50 W, while the LX PRO draws 225 W, a 4.5x difference. This explains the RTX 5070 Mobile's integrated form factor and lack of power connectors versus the LX PRO's dual-slot design with a 16-pin connector. The RTX 5070 Mobile achieves its performance within a mobile power budget, while the LX PRO's higher TDP suggests it targets desktop installations with available power delivery. The bus interface difference, PCIe 5.0 versus PCIe 4.0, also reflects their design intents: the RTX 5070 Mobile uses the latest interconnect standard, while the LX PRO uses the previous generation.

The Verdict

The recorded data shows a clear split in applicability. The RTX 5070 Mobile is a verified performer with nine benchmark scores, a 75th percentile ranking, and an average score of 29,928 that places it within 1.7% of several established desktop GPUs. Its 50 W TDP and integrated form factor make it suitable for portable devices, and its dedicated ray tracing and tensor cores provide hardware acceleration for those workloads. The LX PRO, despite higher raw specifications in shading units, texture units, ROPs, FP32 throughput, and memory capacity, has no benchmark results in the database. Its 50th percentile ranking and zero average score reflect the absence of verified performance data, not a measured result.

Users who need confirmed performance should select the RTX 5070 Mobile. The benchmark results indicate it delivers competitive scores against GPUs like the RTX 3070 Ti and RX 6800, with the smallest recorded delta being 0.1% below the RTX 3070 Ti. The LX PRO offers a larger memory pool (24 GB versus 8 GB), higher FP32 throughput (24.58 TFLOPS versus 13.13 TFLOPS), and a wider 192-bit memory bus, but none of these specifications are validated by test scores. The vendor for the LX PRO is listed as unknown, and its architecture, TrueGPU, has no established track record in the database.

The choice depends on whether verified performance or untested specifications matter more. The RTX 5070 Mobile delivers documented results across OpenCL, Vulkan, and DirectX workloads. The LX PRO presents an attractive spec sheet with higher compute counts and memory capacity, but the database records no evidence of its real-world performance. For applications requiring ray tracing or tensor operations, the RTX 5070 Mobile is the only option with dedicated hardware. For applications demanding large memory capacity or raw FP32 throughput on paper, the LX PRO appears favorable, but its lack of benchmark data leaves that assessment unconfirmed.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile has an average benchmark score of 29,928. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has an average score of 0 because no benchmark results are recorded for it.

Q: What is the memory capacity difference between the two GPUs?

A: The RTX 5070 Mobile has 8 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit bus. The LX PRO has 24 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, offering three times the capacity.

Q: Does the Lisuan Tech LX PRO have ray tracing cores?

A: No. The LX PRO has no ray tracing cores or tensor cores recorded in its specifications. The RTX 5070 Mobile includes 36 ray tracing cores and 144 tensor cores.

Q: How does the RTX 5070 Mobile compare to the RTX 3070 Ti in average score?

A: The RTX 5070 Mobile scores 29,928 on average, which is 0.1% below the RTX 3070 Ti's average score of 29,945.

Q: What is the TDP difference between the two GPUs?

A: The RTX 5070 Mobile has a 50 W TDP and is an integrated GPU. The LX PRO has a 225 W TDP and is a dual-slot discrete card requiring a 1x 16-pin power connector.

Q: Which GPU has a higher shading unit count?

A: The LX PRO has 6,144 shading units, while the RTX 5070 Mobile has 4,608 shading units. The LX PRO also has more texture units (192 versus 144) and more ROPs (96 versus 48).

Specification Differences

| Specification | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile | Lisuan Tech LX PRO |

|---------------|-------------------------------|-------------------|

| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | TrueGPU |

| Process Node | 5 nm | 6 nm |

| Transistors | 21,900 million | Unknown |

| Die Size | 181 mm² | Unknown |

| Base Clock | 907 MHz | Not recorded |

| Boost Clock | 1425 MHz | Not recorded |

| Memory Clock | 1500 MHz, 24 Gbps effective | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective |

| Memory Size | 8 GB | 24 GB |

| Memory Type | GDDR7 | GDDR6 |

| Memory Bus Width | 128 bit | 192 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | 384.0 GB/s | 432.0 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 4,608 | 6,144 |

| Texture Mapping Units | 144 | 192 |

| Raster Output Units | 48 | 96 |

| Ray Tracing Cores | 36 | None |

| Tensor Cores | 144 | None |

| Pixel Rate | 68.40 GPixel/s | 192.0 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 205.2 GTexel/s | 384.0 GTexel/s |

| FP32 Performance | 13.13 TFLOPS | 24.58 TFLOPS |

| FP16 Performance | 13.13 TFLOPS (1:1) | 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| TDP | 50 W | 225 W |

| Slot Width | IGP | Dual-slot |

| Power Connectors | None | 1x 16-pin |

| Suggested PSU | Not recorded | 550 W |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 5.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |

| Display Outputs | Portable Device Dependent | 4x DisplayPort 1.4a |

| Vulkan Version | 1.4 | 1.3 |

| Dimensions | Not recorded | 248 mm length, 118 mm height, 48 mm width |

| Release Date | 2025-04-14 | 2026-03-16 |