NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER Comparison

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER are both Blackwell 2.0 parts on TSMC's 5 nm node, but they occupy opposite ends of the laptop-to-desktop spectrum. The Mobile variant is a 50 W integrated graphics processor (IGP) with 8 GB of GDDR7, while the SUPER is a 350 W dual-slot card with 16 GB of GDDR7 and a 16-pin connector. The recorded data shows a substantial gap in raw compute, memory bandwidth, and board power, but the comparison is complicated by the fact that the database contains only a single benchmark entry for the SUPER part and nine for the Mobile part. This analysis relies strictly on the available measurements.

FAQ

Q: What is the core count difference between the two GPUs?

A: The RTX 5070 Mobile has 4,608 shading units, 144 texture mapping units, 48 ROPs, 36 ray tracing cores, and 144 tensor cores. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has 8,960 shading units, 280 texture mapping units, 96 ROPs, 70 ray tracing cores, and 280 tensor cores.

Q: How much memory does each card have and what is the bandwidth?

A: The Mobile card has 8 GB of GDDR7 on a 128-bit bus, delivering 384.0 GB/s. The Ti SUPER has 16 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus, delivering 896.0 GB/s.

Q: What is the thermal design power for each?

A: The RTX 5070 Mobile is rated at 50 W and uses no power connectors. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is rated at 350 W and uses a single 16-pin connector.

Q: Which card has a higher boost clock?

A: The Ti SUPER boosts to 2452 MHz, while the Mobile card boosts to 1425 MHz. The base clocks are 2295 MHz for the SUPER and 907 MHz for the Mobile.

Q: What are the average benchmark scores in the database?

A: The Mobile card has an average benchmark score of 29,928 across nine tests (Geekbench OpenCL, Vulkan, and multiple Passmark tests). The Ti SUPER has an average score of 6,270 based on a single 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test.

Q: How do the nearest rivals compare for each card?

A: The Mobile card's closest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti with an average score of 29,945, a delta of -0.1%. The Ti SUPER's closest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 with an average score of 6,270, a delta of 0%.

Architecture Differences

Both GPUs share the Blackwell 2.0 architecture and the same 5 nm TSMC process, but the silicon is different. The RTX 5070 Mobile uses the GB206 chip with 21,900 million transistors on a 181 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 121.0M per mm². The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER uses the GB203 chip with 45,600 million transistors on a 378 mm² die, with a density of 120.6M per mm². The die sizes differ by more than a factor of two, and the transistor count for the SUPER is more than double that of the Mobile part.

The memory subsystem is also a major architectural separator. The Mobile card uses a 128-bit bus with 8 GB of GDDR7, while the SUPER uses a 256-bit bus with 16 GB of GDDR7. Effective memory speed is 24 Gbps for the Mobile and 28 Gbps for the SUPER. These differences multiply into a bandwidth gap: 384.0 GB/s versus 896.0 GB/s, a 512 GB/s advantage for the SUPER.

Clock behavior differs sharply. The Mobile part has a base clock of 907 MHz and a boost of 1425 MHz. The SUPER starts at 2295 MHz base and boosts to 2452 MHz. The SUPER's boost clock is 1,027 MHz higher than the Mobile's boost. This clock advantage, combined with the larger chip, drives a major throughput gap. Pixel rate for the Mobile is 68.40 GPixel/s; the SUPER delivers 235.4 GPixel/s. Texture rate is 205.2 GTexel/s for the Mobile versus 686.6 GTexel/s for the SUPER. FP32 compute is 13.13 TFLOPS for the Mobile, while the SUPER reaches 43.94 TFLOPS, a 3.3x multiple. FP16 is identical to FP32 on both (1:1 ratio).

Board power reflects the architectural gulf. The Mobile is a 50 W IGP with no slot width specified beyond "IGP" and no power connectors. The SUPER is a 350 W dual-slot card with a 1x 16-pin connector, measuring 304 mm long, 137 mm high, and 48 mm wide. The Mobile's display outputs are listed as "Portable Device Dependent," while the SUPER offers 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b. Both use PCIe 5.0 x16 and support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database does not include a shared benchmark test between the two GPUs. The RTX 5070 Mobile has nine recorded scores: Geekbench OpenCL at 122,238, Geekbench Vulkan at 116,960, Passmark DirectX 10 at 129, DirectX 11 at 192, DirectX 12 at 93, DirectX 9 at 214, G2D at 896, G3D at 20,355, and GPU Compute at 8,279. Its average benchmark score is 29,928. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has a single recorded score: 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 at 6,269.5, with an average of 6,270.

Because no test appears in both lists, a direct score-to-score comparison on identical workloads is impossible from the current data. What can be compared is the average benchmark score and the percentile ranking. The Mobile card sits at the 75th percentile of all GPUs in the database, while the SUPER sits at the 36th percentile. That percentile gap is counterintuitive given the SUPER's far larger specification sheet, but it is an artifact of the different test sets. The Mobile's nine tests include many legacy Passmark DirectX 9 and DirectX 10 workloads that produce low absolute numbers but still contribute to an average that lands near 30,000. The SUPER's single 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6,269.5 is a modern, heavy load, and its average is correspondingly low.

The nearest rival data reinforces the split. The Mobile card is nearly matched by the RTX 3070 Ti (29,945, delta -0.1%), the RTX 2080 Ti (29,783, delta 0.5%), the RX 6800 (30,095, delta -0.6%), and the RX 6700 (30,433, delta -1.7%). These are all desktop-class GPUs from previous generations, and the Mobile card's average is within 1.7% of each. The SUPER's nearest rivals are the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 (6,270, delta 0%), the Quadro K620 (6,282, delta -0.2%), the FirePro W600 (6,223, delta 0.8%), and the Radeon R7 M350 (6,327, delta -0.9%). The SUPER is effectively tied with the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 in this single test, while the other three rivals are low-end or older parts that happen to produce similar Steel Nomad scores.

In terms of raw specification deltas, the SUPER leads the Mobile by 8,960 versus 4,608 shading units (94% more), 280 versus 144 TMUs, 96 versus 48 ROPs, 70 versus 36 RT cores, and 280 versus 144 tensor cores. Bandwidth is 896.0 GB/s versus 384.0 GB/s, a 133% increase. FP32 is 43.94 versus 13.13 TFLOPS, a 235% increase. The SUPER also has twice the memory capacity (16 GB versus 8 GB) and a higher boost clock (2452 MHz versus 1425 MHz). The Mobile card draws 50 W, while the SUPER draws 350 W, a sevenfold increase in TDP.

The Verdict

The recorded data supports a clear hardware hierarchy: the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is the far more capable part on paper, with higher clocks, more cores, double the memory, and over twice the FP32 throughput. Its single 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score places it at the 36th percentile, but that score is not directly comparable to the Mobile card's average because the test workloads differ. The Mobile card's 75th percentile comes from a broader suite of older API tests, which tend to produce larger average numbers.

For a user selecting between these two, the decision rests on form factor and power envelope. The RTX 5070 Mobile is a 50 W IGP with no power connectors, designed for portable devices where board space and cooling are minimal. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is a 350 W dual-slot card requiring a 16-pin connector and a 304 mm chassis clearance. The SUPER delivers 43.94 TFLOPS of FP32, 896.0 GB/s of bandwidth, and 16 GB of VRAM, which positions it for high-resolution texture workloads and compute tasks that exceed the Mobile card's 8 GB capacity and 384.0 GB/s bandwidth.

The Mobile card's nearest rivals are all desktop GPUs from earlier generations, and it trades within a narrow band of them (deltas between -1.7% and +0.5%). The SUPER's nearest rival, the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102, matches it exactly with a 0% delta in the Steel Nomad test. The other three rivals (K620, FirePro W600, R7 M350) are far less capable parts, indicating that the SUPER's single benchmark score sits in a sparse region of the database.

Specification Differences

| Specification | RTX 5070 Mobile | RTX 5070 Ti SUPER |

|----------------|-----------------|-------------------|

| Chip | GB206 | GB203 |

| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |

| Transistors | 21,900 million | 45,600 million |

| Die Size | 181 mm² | 378 mm² |

| Base Clock | 907 MHz | 2295 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 1425 MHz | 2452 MHz |

| Memory Size | 8 GB | 16 GB |

| Memory Type | GDDR7 | GDDR7 |

| Bus Width | 128 bit | 256 bit |

| Memory Speed | 1500 MHz 24 Gbps effective | 1750 MHz 28 Gbps effective |

| Bandwidth | 384.0 GB/s | 896.0 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 4,608 | 8,960 |

| TMUs | 144 | 280 |

| ROPs | 48 | 96 |

| RT Cores | 36 | 70 |

| Tensor Cores | 144 | 280 |

| Pixel Rate | 68.40 GPixel/s | 235.4 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 205.2 GTexel/s | 686.6 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 13.13 TFLOPS | 43.94 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 13.13 TFLOPS (1:1) | 43.94 TFLOPS (1:1) |

| TDP | 50 W | 350 W |

| Slot Width | IGP | Dual-slot |

| Power Connectors | None | 1x 16-pin |

| Display Outputs | Portable Device Dependent | 1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b |

| Dimensions | N/A | 304 mm x 137 mm x 48 mm |

| Release Date | 2025-04-14 | 2025-12-31 |

| Launch MSRP | None | 749 USD |

Where Each One Wins

RTX 5070 Mobile wins on power efficiency and integration. The 50 W TDP with no external power connectors makes it viable for thin-and-light laptops, whereas the SUPER demands a 350 W power supply connection and a dual-slot cooler. The Mobile card's average benchmark score of 29,928 places it at the 75th percentile, a higher percentile than the SUPER's 36th percentile, though this reflects the different test suites. Its nearest rivals include the RTX 3070 Ti and RX 6800, both desktop cards, and the Mobile part stays within 1.7% of them in average score. For legacy DirectX workloads, the Mobile card shows a Passmark DirectX 9 score of 214 and DirectX 11 score of 192, which are its strongest legacy results. It also has a Geekbench OpenCL score of 122,238, which is its highest single score in the database.

RTX 5070 Ti SUPER wins on raw performance and capacity. The 43.94 TFLOPS FP32 output is 3.3 times the Mobile card's 13.13 TFLOPS. The 896.0 GB/s bandwidth is more than double the Mobile's 384.0 GB/s. The 16 GB memory capacity doubles the Mobile's 8 GB. The SUPER's boost clock of 2452 MHz exceeds the Mobile's boost by 1,027 MHz. Its texture rate of 686.6 GTexel/s and pixel rate of 235.4 GPixel/s are both over three times the Mobile's figures. The single 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6,269.5 is the only direct performance data point, and it exactly matches the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102's score of 6,270. The SUPER also carries a launch MSRP of 749 USD, which is the only price information in the database.

The two cards do not overlap in typical deployment. The Mobile part appears in portable devices with device-dependent display outputs, no slot width beyond IGP, and no dimension data. The SUPER is a standalone expansion card with defined dimensions and a fixed set of display connectors. For compute-heavy workloads that fit within 16 GB VRAM, the SUPER's larger core count and memory bandwidth give it a clear advantage. For battery-powered or space-constrained systems, the Mobile part's 50 W draw and connector-free design are the deciding factors. The database does not contain a shared benchmark, so a direct performance comparison on identical workloads is not available; the specification differences and the nearest rival data provide the only measurable basis for the split.