NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile vs Lisuan Tech LX PRO Comparison

Where Each One Wins

The recorded data presents a stark contrast between these two GPUs. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile has a full suite of benchmark results, while the Lisuan Tech LX PRO has no recorded benchmark scores at all. Consequently, the wins column shows zero for both parts in direct head-to-head testing, but the database still contains enough information to characterize where each hardware design is positioned based on its architecture and specifications.

The RTX 5060 Mobile is a mobile, integrated-class part with a 45 W TDP and an IGP slot width. Its benchmark profile includes a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3013.5, Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan scores of 96969 and 96451 respectively, and a PassMark G3D score of 18852. These measurements place it at the 67th percentile among all GPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 22435. Its nearest rivals in the database include the AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT at 22549 average score (0.5% ahead), the AMD Radeon RX 5700 at 22170 (1.2% behind), the AMD Radeon RX 6700S at 22154 (1.3% behind), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile at 22729 (1.3% ahead). This places the RTX 5060 Mobile in a competitive band where it trades positions within a narrow margin of roughly 1.3% against its closest peers.

The Lisuan Tech LX PRO, by contrast, has an empty benchmark array, a 50th percentile ranking, and an average benchmark score of 0. It has no nearest rivals listed. The data indicates this is a desktop, dual-slot card with a 225 W TDP, a 1x 16-pin power connector, and a suggested 550 W power supply. Its advantage lies in raw specification headroom rather than measured performance. The LX PRO offers more memory, a wider bus, higher bandwidth, more shading units, more texture mapping units, more render output units, and substantially higher theoretical fill rates and compute throughput. None of these specifications are validated by benchmark scores in the database, so the wins for this part are purely architectural.

The Verdict

Based strictly on the database, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile is the only part with verified performance data. Any user selecting between these two based on measured results must choose the RTX 5060 Mobile, as the LX PRO has no recorded scores to compare. The RTX 5060 Mobile delivers a 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3013.5, which is a modern DX12 workload result. Its PassMark G3D score of 18852 and GPU compute score of 7607 further establish a measurable performance baseline.

The Lisuan Tech LX PRO, however, is positioned for scenarios where the RTX 5060 Mobile cannot compete on capacity. The LX PRO packs 24 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth, versus 8 GB of GDDR7 on a 128-bit bus with 384.0 GB/s bandwidth for the RTX 5060 Mobile. The LX PRO also has 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs, compared to 3328 shading units, 104 TMUs, and 48 ROPs for the RTX 5060 Mobile. The LX PRO reaches 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 and 49.15 TFLOPS FP16, while the RTX 5060 Mobile delivers 9.684 TFLOPS on both FP32 and FP16. For workloads that need massive frame buffers or raw compute throughput, the LX PRO is the only option with the hardware resources.

The verdict is split by use case. The RTX 5060 Mobile is the choice for validated performance in a low-power mobile form factor. The LX PRO is the choice for high-capacity, high-throughput desktop workloads, assuming its theoretical specifications translate into real performance, which the database does not confirm.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head benchmark array in the database is empty. There are no direct comparison scores between the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile and the Lisuan Tech LX PRO. The wins counters show 0 for both parts. This absence of data means every comparative statement must rely on the RTX 5060 Mobile's absolute scores and the LX PRO's specification sheet.

The RTX 5060 Mobile's strongest measured results are in Geekbench compute tests. Its OpenCL score of 96969 and Vulkan score of 96451 are nearly identical, indicating balanced compute performance across those two APIs. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3013.5 is the only modern gaming workload in the set. PassMark results vary widely by API generation: DirectX 9 scores 203, DirectX 10 scores 119, DirectX 11 scores 168, and DirectX 12 scores 87. The PassMark G2D score of 876 and G3D score of 18852 show that the 3D workload dominates the 2D workload by a factor of over 21 times. The PassMark GPU compute score of 7607 is roughly 40% of the G3D score.

Against its nearest rivals, the RTX 5060 Mobile sits in a tight cluster. The AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT averages 22549, which is 0.5% higher than the RTX 5060 Mobile's 22435 average. The AMD Radeon RX 5700 and RX 6700S average 22170 and 22154, respectively, which are 1.2% and 1.3% lower. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile averages 22729, which is 1.3% higher. These deltas are all within a narrow band, meaning the RTX 5060 Mobile is effectively tied with each of these rivals in average benchmark score.

FAQ

Q: Does the Lisuan Tech LX PRO have any benchmark scores in the database?

A: No. The LX PRO has an empty benchmark array, an average benchmark score of 0, and a percentile rank of 50 among all GPUs. There are no measured results for any test.

Q: How much memory do the two GPUs have?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile has 8 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit bus. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has 24 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth difference?

A: The RTX 5060 Mobile provides 384.0 GB/s bandwidth. The LX PRO provides 432.0 GB/s bandwidth, which is 48.0 GB/s higher.

Q: Which GPU has more shading units?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has 6144 shading units. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile has 3328 shading units.

Q: What are the TDP values for each GPU?

A: The RTX 5060 Mobile has a TDP of 45 W and uses an IGP slot width with no power connectors. The LX PRO has a TDP of 225 W, uses a dual-slot design, requires a 1x 16-pin power connector, and suggests a 550 W power supply.

Q: What is the RTX 5060 Mobile's average benchmark score compared to its nearest rival?

A: The RTX 5060 Mobile averages 22435. Its closest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT, averages 22549, which is 0.5% higher. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile averages 22729, which is 1.3% higher.

Architecture Differences

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile is built on the GB206 chip using the Blackwell 2.0 architecture, manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC. It contains 21,900 million transistors on a die size of 181 mm², giving a transistor density of 121.0 million per mm². The core layout includes 3328 shading units, 104 texture mapping units, 48 render output units, 26 ray tracing cores, and 104 tensor cores. The architecture supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The memory subsystem uses 8 GB of GDDR7 on a 128-bit bus, with a memory clock of 1500 MHz running at 24 Gbps effective, yielding 384.0 GB/s bandwidth. The base clock is 952 MHz with a boost clock of 1455 MHz. Pixel rate is 69.84 GPixel/s, texture rate is 151.3 GTexel/s, and FP32 compute is 9.684 TFLOPS. FP16 runs at the same 9.684 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio.

The Lisuan Tech LX PRO uses the 7G105 chip with the TrueGPU architecture, manufactured on a 6 nm process at TSMC. The transistor count and die size are listed as unknown. It has 6144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 96 render output units, but no ray tracing cores or tensor cores are listed. The architecture supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.3, one version behind the RTX 5060 Mobile's Vulkan 1.4. The memory subsystem uses 24 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, with a memory clock of 2250 MHz running at 18 Gbps effective, yielding 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. No base or boost clocks are recorded for the LX PRO. Pixel rate is 192.0 GPixel/s, texture rate is 384.0 GTexel/s, and FP32 compute is 24.58 TFLOPS. FP16 reaches 49.15 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio, meaning the LX PRO has a dedicated FP16 throughput advantage.

The RTX 5060 Mobile uses PCIe 5.0 x16, while the LX PRO uses PCIe 4.0 x16. Display outputs for the RTX 5060 Mobile are listed as portable device dependent, while the LX PRO has 4x DisplayPort 1.4a. The RTX 5060 Mobile's slot width is IGP with no power connectors, whereas the LX PRO is dual-slot with a single 16-pin power connector.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ across nearly every recorded specification field. The process node differs: the RTX 5060 Mobile uses 5 nm from TSMC, while the LX PRO uses 6 nm from TSMC. The RTX 5060 Mobile has a known transistor count of 21,900 million and die size of 181 mm²; the LX PRO has both listed as unknown. The memory type differs: GDDR7 for the RTX 5060 Mobile versus GDDR6 for the LX PRO. Memory size is 8 GB versus 24 GB. Bus width is 128 bit versus 192 bit. Bandwidth is 384.0 GB/s versus 432.0 GB/s.

Shading units are 3328 versus 6144. TMUs are 104 versus 192. ROPs are 48 versus 96. The RTX 5060 Mobile has 26 ray tracing cores and 104 tensor cores; the LX PRO has neither listed. Pixel rate is 69.84 GPixel/s versus 192.0 GPixel/s. Texture rate is 151.3 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel/s. FP32 compute is 9.684 TFLOPS versus 24.58 TFLOPS. FP16 compute is 9.684 TFLOPS versus 49.15 TFLOPS.

TDP is 45 W versus 225 W. Slot width is IGP versus dual-slot. Power connectors are none versus 1x 16-pin. The suggested PSU is null for the RTX 5060 Mobile and 550 W for the LX PRO. Bus interface is PCIe 5.0 x16 versus PCIe 4.0 x16. Display outputs are portable device dependent versus 4x DisplayPort 1.4a. The RTX 5060 Mobile has a release date of 2025-05-19, while the LX PRO has a release date of 2026-03-16. The RTX 5060 Mobile lists its predecessor as GeForce 40 Mobile; the LX PRO lists no predecessor. The LX PRO has physical dimensions of 248 mm length, 118 mm height, and 48 mm width; the RTX 5060 Mobile has no recorded dimensions.