AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile Comparison
AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT
GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile
The AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile represent two fundamentally different approaches to GPU design: a high-power desktop part aimed at sustained performance and a low-power mobile part optimized for efficiency. Despite their disparate physical forms, their aggregate benchmark scores are nearly identical, with the RX 7700 XT averaging 22,549 and the RTX 5060 Mobile averaging 22,435, a difference of just 0.5%. This close overall parity, however, masks significant divergences in individual workloads, architectural philosophies, and physical characteristics that define where each card is the appropriate choice.
Where Each One Wins
The RX 7700 XT is the decisive winner in the majority of benchmark disciplines, taking 8 of the 10 head-to-head tests. Its most commanding victories come in compute-heavy and legacy DirectX workloads. The data shows a 69.7% lead in Passmark GPU Compute, a 44.8% lead in Passmark DirectX 9, and a 38.1% lead in Passmark DirectX 11. These results indicate that for tasks leveraging raw shader throughput or older API paths, the desktop AMD card is in a different class entirely. The RX 7700 XT also wins in modern API tests like 3DMark Steel Nomad (DX12) with a 10% advantage, and in the OpenCL compute benchmark with a massive 42.7% lead, suggesting superior general-purpose compute capabilities.
The RTX 5060 Mobile wins in two specific but notable areas. Its most significant victory is in Geekbench Vulkan, where it scores 96,451 against the RX 7700 XT's 46,443, a 51.8% advantage. This is a massive reversal of the overall trend and points to a highly optimized Vulkan driver stack for the NVIDIA architecture. The mobile part also edges out the desktop card in Passmark DirectX 12, scoring 87 versus 79, a 9.2% difference. This suggests that in certain low-level, modern graphics APIs, the efficiency-focused NVIDIA design can outperform the more power-hungry AMD part, even on the desktop. For users targeting Vulkan-specific titles or specific DX12 workloads, the RTX 5060 Mobile holds a clear edge despite its mobile designation.
Architecture Differences
The architectural gulf between these two GPUs is vast. The RX 7700 XT is built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture using the Navi 32 chip, manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC. The RTX 5060 Mobile utilizes the Blackwell 2.0 architecture with the GB206 chip, also on a 5 nm TSMC process. While both use the same node, the chip designs are radically different in scale. The Navi 32 die is 346 mm² and contains 28,100 million transistors, while the GB206 die is a much smaller 181 mm² with 21,900 million transistors. This results in a transistor density of 81.2M per mm² for the AMD chip versus 121.0M per mm² for the NVIDIA chip, indicating a much denser, more compact design from NVIDIA.
The memory subsystems diverge significantly as well. The RX 7700 XT features 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, providing 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The RTX 5060 Mobile is equipped with 8 GB of newer GDDR7 memory on a narrower 128-bit bus, resulting in 384.0 GB/s of bandwidth. While the AMD card has a 12.5% bandwidth advantage, the NVIDIA card uses a more advanced memory technology. The compute unit configurations also differ: the RX 7700 XT has 3,456 shading units, 216 TMUs, and 96 ROPs, whereas the RTX 5060 Mobile has 3,328 shading units, 104 TMUs, and only 48 ROPs. The RTX 5060 Mobile does include 104 tensor cores, a feature entirely absent from the RX 7700 XT, which may be relevant for AI-accelerated workloads. The RX 7700 XT has 54 ray tracing cores and a much higher pixel rate of 244.2 GPixel/s and texture rate of 549.5 GTexel/s, dwarfing the RTX 5060 Mobile's 69.84 GPixel/s and 151.3 GTexel/s.
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The most striking result in the head-to-head data is the Geekbench Vulkan test. The RTX 5060 Mobile scores 96,451, which is 51.8% higher than the RX 7700 XT's 46,443. This is the single largest delta in either direction and demonstrates a clear software optimization advantage for NVIDIA in this particular API. Conversely, the Geekbench OpenCL test shows the opposite extreme: the RX 7700 XT scores 138,383 against 96,969 for the RTX 5060 Mobile, a 42.7% win for AMD. This dichotomy suggests that the choice of API can be more important than the hardware itself in some compute scenarios.
In the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, which is a modern, demanding benchmark, the RX 7700 XT scores 3,316 versus 3,013.5 for the RTX 5060 Mobile, a 10% lead. This is a significant margin in a current-generation test and indicates that the desktop card has more headroom for future titles. The Passmark G3D test reinforces this, with the RX 7700 XT scoring 22,547 against 18,852, a 19.6% advantage. The compute gap is even more pronounced in Passmark GPU Compute, where AMD leads 12,912 to 7,607, a 69.7% margin. This suggests that for GPGPU tasks like rendering or scientific computation, the RX 7700 XT is far superior. The Passmark DirectX 9 and DirectX 11 results also heavily favor AMD, with 44.8% and 38.1% leads respectively, while the DirectX 10 test is a dead heat at 119 for both cards. The only other NVIDIA win is in Passmark DirectX 12, where it leads 87 to 79, a 9.2% margin.
FAQ
Q: Which GPU has a higher average benchmark score?
A: The AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT has a marginal lead, with an average benchmark score of 22,549 compared to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile's 22,435.
Q: Is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile competitive with the desktop RX 7700 XT?
A: In aggregate, yes. The RTX 5060 Mobile trails the RX 7700 XT by only 0.5% in average score, and it actually beats the AMD card decisively in Geekbench Vulkan by 51.8% and in Passmark DirectX 12 by 9.2%.
Q: Where does the AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT show its biggest advantage?
A: The largest win for the RX 7700 XT is in Passmark GPU Compute, where it scores 12,912 versus 7,607, a 69.7% lead. It also has substantial wins in Geekbench OpenCL (42.7%) and Passmark DirectX 9 (44.8%).
Q: What are the memory differences between the two cards?
A: The RX 7700 XT has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, yielding 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The RTX 5060 Mobile has 8 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit bus, yielding 384.0 GB/s of bandwidth.
Q: Does the RTX 5060 Mobile have any exclusive features?
A: Yes, the RTX 5060 Mobile includes 104 tensor cores, while the RX 7700 XT has none. Additionally, the RTX 5060 Mobile uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface, while the RX 7700 XT uses PCIe 4.0 x16.
Q: How do the physical specifications differ?
A: The RX 7700 XT is a dual-slot desktop card with a 245 W TDP and requires 2x 8-pin power connectors. The RTX 5060 Mobile is an IGP (integrated graphics processor) with a 45 W TDP and requires no power connectors, making it suitable for laptops.
Specification Differences
The following specifications differ between the AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile:
- Architecture: RDNA 3.0 vs Blackwell 2.0
- Chip: Navi 32 vs GB206
- Generation: Navi III (RX 7000) vs GeForce 50 Mobile
- Process Node: Both are 5 nm, but the die size differs: 346 mm² vs 181 mm²
- Transistors: 28,100 million vs 21,900 million
- Transistor Density: 81.2M / mm² vs 121.0M / mm²
- Base Clock: 1435 MHz vs 952 MHz
- Boost Clock: 2544 MHz vs 1455 MHz
- Memory Clock: 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) vs 1500 MHz (24 Gbps effective)
- Memory Size: 12 GB vs 8 GB
- Memory Type: GDDR6 vs GDDR7
- Memory Bus Width: 192 bit vs 128 bit
- Memory Bandwidth: 432.0 GB/s vs 384.0 GB/s
- Shading Units: 3456 vs 3328
- TMUs: 216 vs 104
- ROPs: 96 vs 48
- RT Cores: 54 vs 26
- Tensor Cores: None vs 104
- Pixel Rate: 244.2 GPixel/s vs 69.84 GPixel/s
- Texture Rate: 549.5 GTexel/s vs 151.3 GTexel/s
- FP32 Performance: 35.17 TFLOPS vs 9.684 TFLOPS
- FP16 Performance: 35.17 TFLOPS vs 9.684 TFLOPS
- TDP: 245 W vs 45 W
- Slot Width: Dual-slot vs IGP
- Power Connectors: 2x 8-pin vs None
- Suggested PSU: 550 W vs Not specified
- Bus Interface: PCIe 4.0 x16 vs PCIe 5.0 x16
- Display Outputs: 1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x USB Type-C vs Portable Device Dependent
- Dimensions: 267 mm x 135 mm x 50 mm vs Not specified
- Release Date: 2023-09-05 vs 2025-05-19
- Predecessor: Navi II vs GeForce 40 Mobile
- Successor: Navi IV vs Not specified
- Launch MSRP: 449 USD vs Not specified