NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 GB205 vs Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark results for the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 GB205 and the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100. Both entries show zero benchmark scores and zero wins in their respective categories. This absence of measured data means a direct numerical comparison of performance in specific workloads is not possible from the available records.

What the data does provide is a set of theoretical throughput figures that can be compared. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 lists a peak FP32 rate of 24.58 TFLOPS, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 GB205 lists 19.18 TFLOPS. That places the LX 7G100 approximately 28% higher in raw single-precision compute potential. In FP16 workloads, the gap widens substantially: the LX 7G100 reaches 49.15 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio, while the RTX 5060 delivers 19.18 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio. The FP16 advantage for the Lisuan part is roughly 2.56 times the RTX 5060's output.

Texture and pixel throughput also favor the Lisuan Tech card. The LX 7G100 lists a texture rate of 384.0 GTexel/s versus 299.6 GTexel/s for the RTX 5060, a difference of about 28%. In pixel rate, the LX 7G100 posts 192.0 GPixel/s compared to 119.9 GPixel/s for the NVIDIA card, a 60% advantage.

Memory bandwidth tells a different story. The RTX 5060 uses GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit bus, producing 448.0 GB/s. The LX 7G100 uses GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, producing 432.0 GB/s. The NVIDIA card holds a 3.7% bandwidth lead despite the narrower bus, owing to the higher effective memory clock of 28 Gbps versus 18 Gbps.

Neither card has any recorded wins in the head-to-head benchmark table. The percentile ranking for both is 50 against all GPUs in the database, indicating they sit at the median of recorded hardware. Without actual benchmark scores, the theoretical compute figures remain the only quantitative basis for comparison.

Where Each One Wins

Based on the recorded specifications, the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 shows advantages in several measurable categories. Its FP32 output of 24.58 TFLOPS exceeds the RTX 5060's 19.18 TFLOPS, which matters for general compute workloads. The FP16 figure of 49.15 TFLOPS versus 19.18 TFLOPS is a more pronounced lead, relevant for workloads that can use reduced precision. The LX 7G100 also has higher texture rate (384.0 GTexel/s vs 299.6 GTexel/s), higher pixel rate (192.0 GPixel/s vs 119.9 GPixel/s), more shading units (6144 vs 3840), more texture mapping units (192 vs 120), and more render output units (96 vs 48). It also carries 12 GB of memory versus 8 GB, and a wider 192-bit bus versus 128-bit.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 GB205 shows advantages in other areas. Its memory bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s edges out the LX 7G100's 432.0 GB/s. The GDDR7 memory type is newer than the GDDR6 used by the Lisuan card. The RTX 5060 lists a smaller process node at 5 nm versus 6 nm, a lower TDP of 145 W versus 225 W, and a lower suggested PSU of 300 W versus 550 W. It also supports PCIe 5.0 x8, while the LX 7G100 uses PCIe 4.0 x16. The NVIDIA card includes dedicated RT cores (30) and tensor cores (120), while the Lisuan part lists no RT core or tensor core count. The RTX 5060 supports newer display outputs with 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b, whereas the LX 7G100 provides 4x DisplayPort 1.4a only. Vulkan support is also newer on the NVIDIA side: version 1.4 versus 1.3.

The use-case split follows from these figures. The LX 7G100 appears positioned for compute-heavy tasks and higher-resolution rendering where raw shader throughput, texture fill, and larger memory capacity matter. The RTX 5060 appears positioned for efficiency, ray tracing, and modern display connectivity, with a higher memory bandwidth per bit of bus width.

Architecture Differences

The two cards come from distinct architectural lineages. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 GB205 uses the Blackwell 2.0 architecture on the GB205 chip. It belongs to the GeForce 50-series and the GeForce 50 generation. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 uses an architecture labeled TrueGPU on the 7G106 chip, belonging to the 7G100 generation.

Manufacturing differs in node size. The RTX 5060 is built on a 5 nm process at TSMC, with 31,100 million transistors on a 263 mm² die. That yields a transistor density of 118.3 million per square millimeter. The LX 7G100 is also fabricated by TSMC but on a 6 nm process. Its transistor count and die size are listed as unknown, so no density figure can be derived.

Clock behavior also diverges. The RTX 5060 lists a base clock of 2280 MHz and a boost clock of 2497 MHz. The LX 7G100 lists no base or boost clock at all. Only the memory clock is recorded for the Lisuan part: 2250 MHz, which translates to 18 Gbps effective. The NVIDIA card's memory clock is 1750 MHz, translating to 28 Gbps effective.

Memory architecture is a clear separator. The RTX 5060 uses 8 GB of GDDR7 on a 128-bit bus. The LX 7G100 uses 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus. Despite the larger bus, the older GDDR6 and lower effective clock produce slightly lower bandwidth for the Lisuan card.

The compute units differ in count and type. The RTX 5060 has 3840 shading units, 120 TMUs, 48 ROPs, 30 RT cores, and 120 tensor cores. The LX 7G100 has 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs, but lists no RT cores or tensor cores. The FP16 ratio also differs: 1:1 for NVIDIA, 2:1 for Lisuan, meaning the LX 7G100 doubles its FP32 throughput in FP16 while the RTX 5060 does not.

Interface and output differences remain. The RTX 5060 uses PCIe 5.0 x8; the LX 7G100 uses PCIe 4.0 x16. Display outputs are 1x HDMI 2.1b plus 3x DisplayPort 2.1b on the NVIDIA side versus 4x DisplayPort 1.4a on the Lisuan side. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6, but Vulkan support is 1.4 versus 1.3.

Power characteristics are substantially different. The RTX 5060 lists a TDP of 145 W with a suggested PSU of 300 W. The LX 7G100 lists a TDP of 225 W with a suggested PSU of 550 W. Both are dual-slot cards with a single 8-pin power connector. Physical dimensions differ: the RTX 5060 measures 241 mm in length, 111 mm in height, and 40 mm in width. The LX 7G100 measures 294 mm in length, 120 mm in height, and 49 mm in width.

FAQ

Q: Which card has higher raw FP32 compute performance?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 lists 24.58 TFLOPS FP32, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 GB205 lists 19.18 TFLOPS. The LX 7G100 holds a lead of approximately 28% in this metric.

Q: How do the memory bandwidth figures compare?

A: The RTX 5060 lists 448.0 GB/s from 8 GB of GDDR7 on a 128-bit bus. The LX 7G100 lists 432.0 GB/s from 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus. The NVIDIA card has a 3.7% bandwidth advantage.

Q: Does the LX 7G100 support ray tracing?

A: The recorded data lists no RT core count for the LX 7G100. The RTX 5060 lists 30 RT cores. The DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) API is listed for both cards, but the presence of dedicated RT hardware is only recorded for the NVIDIA part.

Q: What are the power requirements for each card?

A: The RTX 5060 lists a TDP of 145 W and a suggested PSU of 300 W. The LX 7G100 lists a TDP of 225 W and a suggested PSU of 550 W. Both use a single 8-pin power connector and are dual-slot designs.

Q: Which card has more memory?

A: The LX 7G100 has 12 GB of GDDR6, while the RTX 5060 has 8 GB of GDDR7. The Lisuan card offers 50% more memory capacity, but with a different memory type and slightly lower bandwidth.

Q: What is the process node difference?

A: The RTX 5060 is built on a 5 nm process at TSMC. The LX 7G100 is built on a 6 nm process at TSMC. The RTX 5060 also lists a transistor count of 31,100 million on a 263 mm² die, while the LX 7G100 lists neither transistor count nor die size.

The Verdict

The recorded data presents two cards with fundamentally different strengths. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 shows a clear numerical advantage in shader throughput, texture fill rate, pixel fill rate, and memory capacity. Its FP32 figure of 24.58 TFLOPS, FP16 figure of 49.15 TFLOPS, texture rate of 384.0 GTexel/s, and pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s all exceed the corresponding figures for the RTX 5060. The 12 GB memory capacity doubles the 8 GB of the NVIDIA card in capacity terms, though with a 3.7% bandwidth deficit.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 GB205 shows strengths in efficiency and modern feature support. Its TDP of 145 W is 80 W lower than the LX 7G100's 225 W, and its suggested PSU of 300 W is 250 W lower. It uses a newer 5 nm process, newer GDDR7 memory, newer PCIe 5.0 interface, and newer DisplayPort 2.1b outputs. It lists dedicated RT cores and tensor cores, which the Lisuan part does not. Vulkan support is version 1.4 versus 1.3.

The choice between the two depends on workload priorities. For compute-bound tasks that can use FP16 or FP32 throughput, the LX 7G100's higher TFLOPS figures and larger memory make it the data-supported option. For power-sensitive configurations, ray tracing workloads, or systems with limited PSU headroom, the RTX 5060's lower power draw, RT cores, and newer connectivity standards provide the recorded advantages. The absence of actual benchmark scores means these conclusions rest entirely on specification-level comparisons, not measured performance.

Specification Differences

| Field | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 GB205 | Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 |

|---|---|---|

| Chip | GB205 | 7G106 |

| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | TrueGPU |

| Generation | GeForce 50 | 7G100 |

| Process Node | 5 nm | 6 nm |

| Transistors | 31,100 million | unknown |

| Die Size | 263 mm² | unknown |

| Transistor Density | 118.3M / mm² | null |

| Base Clock | 2280 MHz | null |

| Boost Clock | 2497 MHz | null |

| Memory Clock | 1750 MHz 28 Gbps effective | 2250 MHz 18 Gbps effective |

| Memory Size | 8 GB | 12 GB |

| Memory Type | GDDR7 | GDDR6 |

| Memory Bus Width | 128 bit | 192 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | 448.0 GB/s | 432.0 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 3840 | 6144 |

| TMUs | 120 | 192 |

| ROPs | 48 | 96 |

| RT Cores | 30 | null |

| Tensor Cores | 120 | null |

| Pixel Rate | 119.9 GPixel/s | 192.0 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 299.6 GTexel/s | 384.0 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 19.18 TFLOPS | 24.58 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 19.18 TFLOPS (1:1) | 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| TDP | 145 W | 225 W |

| Suggested PSU | 300 W | 550 W |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 5.0 x8 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |

| Display Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b | 4x DisplayPort 1.4a |

| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.3 |

| Length | 241 mm 9.5 inches | 294 mm 11.6 inches |

| Height | 111 mm 4.4 inches | 120 mm 4.7 inches |

| Width | 40 mm 1.6 inches | 49 mm 1.9 inches |

| Launch MSRP | 299 USD | null |