GPU Comparison

AMD
RADEON

AMD Radeon 680M

CORE STATE Rembrandt+
VRAM System Shared
CLOCK SPEED 2200 MHz
TDP 50 W
BUS WIDTH System Shared
ARCHITECTURE RDNA 2.0
nm
PROCESS 6 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2023
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

GeForce RTX 5050

CORE STATE GB207
VRAM 8 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2572 MHz
TDP 130 W
BUS WIDTH 128 bit
ARCHITECTURE Blackwell 2.0
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2025

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
378
2,502
geekbench_opencl
23,468
90,334
geekbench_vulkan
21,965
89,381
passmark_directx_10
N/A
103
passmark_directx_11
N/A
150
passmark_directx_12
N/A
66
passmark_directx_9
N/A
186
passmark_g2d
N/A
1,113
passmark_g3d
N/A
17,326
passmark_gpu_compute
N/A
9,184

Analysis: AMD Radeon 680M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050

For this graphics card battle, the NVIDIA RTX 5050 demonstrates its dominance clearly. If you're gaming at 1440p, the NVIDIA RTX 5050 dependably exceeds Radeon AMD Radeon 680M by considerable amounts. This speed margin increases especially greater at demanding detail settings. The video card manages intensive titles with efficiency. Its architectural benefits are apparent.

Radeon AMD Radeon 680M struggles to rival the NVIDIA RTX 5050's sheer performance. For cost-sensitive consumers, Radeon AMD Radeon 680M might yet provide acceptable results, yet buyers wanting maximum quality should look toward the NVIDIA RTX 5050. This performance difference is notably large to dismiss. Resource-hungry titles notably demonstrate this margin. This price gap pays dividends in visual quality.

Radeon AMD Radeon 680M encounters issues to rival the NVIDIA RTX 5050's absolute performance. For value-focused users, Radeon AMD Radeon 680M can still deliver acceptable performance, however users seeking maximum experience might invest toward the NVIDIA RTX 5050. The benchmark gap is sufficiently notable to ignore. Resource-hungry games notably demonstrate this gap. The investment delivers rewards in capability.

Overall, the NVIDIA RTX 5050 offers the superior pick in this evaluation. The performance leads support evaluation for users assembling a demanding visual rig. Even though Radeon AMD Radeon 680M possesses its advantages, the test numbers clearly supports the NVIDIA RTX 5050. Make your decision with this in mind. This benchmark delta is considerable sufficiently to impact.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
680M
RTX 5050
Core Specs
Shading Units
768
2,560 +233.3%
Shaders
768
2,560 +233.3%
TMUs
48
80 +66.7%
ROPs
32
32 0.0%
Compute Units
12
SM Count
20
Clocks
Base Clock
2000 MHz
2317 MHz
Boost Clock
2200 MHz
2572 MHz
Memory Clock
System Shared
2500 MHz 20 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
System Shared
8 GB
VRAM (MB)
8,192
Memory Type
System Shared
GDDR6
Memory Bus
System Shared
128 bit
Bandwidth
System Dependent
320.0 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
128 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
2 MB
24 MB
L0 Cache
32 KB per WGP
Performance
Pixel Rate
70.40 GPixel/s
82.30 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
105.6 GTexel/s
205.8 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
3.379 TFLOPS
13.17 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
211.2 GFLOPS (1:16)
205.8 GFLOPS (1:64)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
6.758 TFLOPS (2:1)
13.17 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
12
20 +66.7%
Tensor Cores
80
Power
TDP
50 W
130 W
TDP (W)
50
130 +160.0%
Suggested PSU
300 W
Power Connectors
None
1x 8-pin
Architecture
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
Blackwell 2.0
GPU Name
Rembrandt+
GB207
Generation
Navi II IGP (Rembrandt Mobile)
GeForce 50
Process Size
6 nm
5 nm
Transistors
13,100 million
16,900 million
Die Size
208 mm²
149 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
TSMC
Density
63.0M / mm²
113.4M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
2.0
3.0
CUDA
12.0
Shader Model
6.8
6.9
Physical
Slot Width
IGP
Dual-slot
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
1x HDMI 2.1b3x DisplayPort 2.1b
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
PCIe 5.0 x8
Other
Launch Price
249 USD
Production
Active
Active
Predecessor
Vega II IGP
GeForce 40
Successor
Navi III IGP
GeForce 60
View Radeon 680M Details View GeForce RTX 5050 Details