NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile vs Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA Comparison

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile is a 5 nm Ada Lovelace chip for laptops, while Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA is a 6 nm TrueGPU desktop card. The database shows one is a mobile part with a 120 W TDP and integrated graphics, while the other is a dual-slot desktop card with a 225 W TDP and a 16-pin power connector. Benchmark data exists only for the NVIDIA part, giving it a measurable standing against other GPUs, while the Lisuan card has no recorded scores. The following sections compare the two based on recorded specifications and test results.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark results between these two products. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile has nine recorded benchmark scores, while the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has none. This means every numerical comparison in this section comes from the NVIDIA card’s own test results and its position relative to other GPUs in the database.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile produces an average benchmark score of 43667 across all recorded tests. Its highest single score comes from Geekbench OpenCL at 180831, followed by Geekbench Vulkan at 170774. Passmark tests show different strengths: the DirectX 9 score is 310, DirectX 10 is 173, DirectX 11 is 262, and DirectX 12 is 107. The Passmark G3D score is 27212, while the GPU compute score is 12347. The 2D graphics score is 984.

Because the Lisuan card has no benchmark entries, its average score is 0 and its percentile rank sits at 50 among all GPUs, which is the median position by default. The NVIDIA card sits at the 84th percentile, meaning it outperforms 84 percent of all GPUs in the database. When comparing the NVIDIA card to its nearest rivals, the data shows narrow margins. The NVIDIA Quadro M6000 has an average score of 43301, which is 0.8 percent lower than the RTX 4090 Mobile. The GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile scores 43268, also 0.8 percent behind. The Quadro M6000 24 GB scores 43262, 0.9 percent behind. The RTX A6000 scores 44075, which is 0.9 percent higher than the RTX 4090 Mobile. These deltas indicate the RTX 4090 Mobile is essentially tied with those four cards, with differences under one percent in either direction.

The absence of Lisuan scores means no wins can be assigned to either side. The data shows the NVIDIA card has a measurable performance profile, while the Lisuan card’s performance remains unquantified. For any prospective comparison, the only concrete numbers belong to the RTX 4090 Mobile, and they place it in the upper tier of the database.

FAQ

Q: What is the average benchmark score for the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile?

A: The database records an average benchmark score of 43667 for the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile, based on nine individual test scores.

Q: Does the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA have any benchmark scores?

A: No. The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has zero recorded benchmark entries, resulting in an average benchmark score of 0 and a percentile rank of 50 among all GPUs.

Q: How does the RTX 4090 Mobile compare to its nearest rival, the RTX A6000?

A: The RTX A6000 has an average score of 44075, which is 0.9 percent higher than the RTX 4090 Mobile’s 43667. This is the only rival in the database that scores above the RTX 4090 Mobile.

Q: Which benchmark gives the RTX 4090 Mobile its highest score?

A: The Geekbench OpenCL test produces the highest score at 180831. The Geekbench Vulkan test is close behind at 170774.

Q: What is the pixel rate difference between the two cards?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has a pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile has a pixel rate of 189.8 GPixel/s. The Lisuan card is 2.2 GPixel/s higher.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth for each card?

A: The RTX 4090 Mobile has 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth with a 256-bit bus and 16 GB of GDDR6. The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has 432.0 GB/s with a 192-bit bus and 24 GB of GDDR6.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs use different fabrication processes. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile is built on a 5 nm node at TSMC, while the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA uses a 6 nm node, also at TSMC. The NVIDIA chip is called AD103 and belongs to the Ada Lovelace architecture, part of the GeForce 40-series and the GeForce 40 Mobile generation. The Lisuan chip is named 7G105 and uses a TrueGPU architecture, belonging to the 7G100 generation.

Transistor counts differ sharply. The NVIDIA chip has 45,900 million transistors on a die size of 379 mm², giving a transistor density of 121.1M per mm². The Lisuan chip’s transistor count and die size are listed as unknown, with no density figure recorded.

The NVIDIA card uses 9728 shading units, 304 texture mapping units, and 112 ROPs. It also includes 76 RT cores and 304 tensor cores. The Lisuan card has 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. It has no recorded RT core or tensor core counts. The NVIDIA card’s FP32 compute is 32.98 TFLOPS, while the Lisuan card delivers 24.58 TFLOPS. For FP16, the NVIDIA card matches its FP32 at 32.98 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio. The Lisuan card reaches 49.15 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio, meaning its FP16 throughput is double its FP32.

Memory architecture also differs. Both use GDDR6 memory at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed. The NVIDIA card has 16 GB on a 256-bit bus, yielding 576.0 GB/s. The Lisuan card has 24 GB on a 192-bit bus, yielding 432.0 GB/s. Despite having more capacity, the Lisuan card has lower bandwidth due to the narrower bus.

Texture and pixel rates reflect the core configurations. The NVIDIA card achieves 515.3 GTexel/s and 189.8 GPixel/s. The Lisuan card achieves 384.0 GTexel/s and 192.0 GPixel/s. The NVIDIA card has higher texture throughput, while the Lisuan card has a slightly higher pixel rate.

API support shows some differences. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The NVIDIA card supports Vulkan 1.4, while the Lisuan card supports Vulkan 1.3. The NVIDIA card has no display outputs listed, described as portable device dependent. The Lisuan card has 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs.

Power and physical design diverge significantly. The NVIDIA card has a TDP of 120 W, an IGP slot width, and no power connectors. The Lisuan card has a TDP of 225 W, a dual-slot width, a 1x 16-pin power connector, and a suggested PSU of 550 W. The Lisuan card measures 268 mm in length, 112 mm in height, and 40 mm in width, while the NVIDIA card has no recorded dimensions.

The Verdict

Based on recorded data, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile is the only one of the two with benchmark evidence. Its average score of 43667 places it at the 84th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals, the Quadro M6000, RTX 5050 Mobile, Quadro M6000 24 GB, and RTX A6000, all sit within 0.9 percent of its score, showing the RTX 4090 Mobile competes at a high level. The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has no scores, leaving its actual performance unknown, though its specifications indicate a different design.

For users who prioritize proven compute performance, the NVIDIA card has the data to support its capability. The RTX 4090 Mobile delivers 32.98 TFLOPS FP32, 76 RT cores, and 304 tensor cores, which are features suited for workloads that rely on ray tracing and tensor operations. The Lisuan card offers 24.58 TFLOPS FP32, no recorded RT or tensor cores, and a higher FP16 rate of 49.15 TFLOPS. The Lisuan card’s 24 GB memory capacity exceeds the NVIDIA card’s 16 GB, but its bandwidth is lower at 432.0 GB/s versus 576.0 GB/s.

The physical form factor is a decisive factor. The NVIDIA card is an IGP with no power connectors, intended for integrated mobile systems. The Lisuan card is a dual-slot desktop card requiring a 550 W PSU and a 16-pin connector. Users building a desktop system with space and power headroom may find the Lisuan card’s specifications relevant, but without benchmark numbers, its real-world standing cannot be assessed. The NVIDIA card’s recorded scores and percentile rank make it the only product in this comparison with verified performance data.

The RTX 4090 Mobile also has a release date of January 2, 2023, while the Lisuan card has a release date of March 16, 2026. The NVIDIA card’s predecessor is GeForce 30 Mobile and its successor is GeForce 50 Mobile. The Lisuan card has no recorded predecessor or successor. The NVIDIA card has an active production status, as does the Lisuan card. For anyone choosing between these two, the database shows the NVIDIA card has a proven benchmark profile, while the Lisuan card’s performance remains entirely unmeasured.

Specification Differences

The following table lists only the fields where the two products differ, based on recorded data.

| Field | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile | Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA |

|-------|-------------------------------|----------------------|

| Series | GeForce 40-series | Not recorded |

| Manufacturer | NVIDIA | Unknown |

| Chip | AD103 | 7G105 |

| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | TrueGPU |

| Generation | GeForce 40 Mobile | 7G100 |

| Process Node | 5 nm | 6 nm |

| Transistors | 45,900 million | Unknown |

| Die Size | 379 mm² | Unknown |

| Transistor Density | 121.1M / mm² | Not recorded |

| Base Clock | 1335 MHz | Not recorded |

| Boost Clock | 1695 MHz | Not recorded |

| Memory Size | 16 GB | 24 GB |

| Memory Bus Width | 256 bit | 192 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | 576.0 GB/s | 432.0 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 9728 | 6144 |

| TMUs | 304 | 192 |

| ROPs | 112 | 96 |

| RT Cores | 76 | Not recorded |

| Tensor Cores | 304 | Not recorded |

| Pixel Rate | 189.8 GPixel/s | 192.0 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 515.3 GTexel/s | 384.0 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 32.98 TFLOPS | 24.58 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 32.98 TFLOPS (1:1) | 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| TDP | 120 W | 225 W |

| Slot Width | IGP | Dual-slot |

| Power Connectors | None | 1x 16-pin |

| Suggested PSU | Not recorded | 550 W |

| Display Outputs | Portable Device Dependent | 4x DisplayPort 1.4a |

| Vulkan API | 1.4 | 1.3 |

| Dimensions | Not recorded | 268 mm length, 112 mm height, 40 mm width |

| Release Date | 2023-01-02 | 2026-03-16 |

| Predecessor | GeForce 30 Mobile | Not recorded |

| Successor | GeForce 50 Mobile | Not recorded |

| Average Benchmark Score | 43667 | 0 |

| Percentile vs All GPUs | 84 | 50 |

The NVIDIA card has a smaller process node, more shading units, more TMUs, more ROPs, dedicated RT and tensor cores, higher FP32 throughput, higher memory bandwidth, and a lower TDP. The Lisuan card has more memory capacity, a higher pixel rate, higher FP16 throughput, a wider physical footprint, and a later release date. Vulkan support also differs, with the NVIDIA card on version 1.4 and the Lisuan card on 1.3.