NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 vs Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database currently contains no direct head-to-head benchmark results between the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 and the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA. This absence of comparative data is significant, as it means any performance assessment must rely on the individual recorded metrics for each product and the contextual ranking information available for the RTX 4070.

The RTX 4070 has an extensive set of recorded benchmark scores. In 3DMark Steel Nomad (DX12), it scores 3854 points. Its Geekbench OpenCL score is 154858, and its Geekbench Vulkan score is 174152. The PassMark suite shows a G3D score of 26927, a G2D score of 1164, and a GPU Compute score of 14720. Legacy DirectX tests show scores of 320 for DX9, 244 for DX11, 139 for DX10, and 103 for DX12. These figures establish a clear performance baseline for the RTX 4070.

The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA, however, has an empty benchmark array. Its average benchmark score is recorded as 0, and its percentile rank against all GPUs is 50. This means the database has no measured performance data for this GPU. The RTX 4070, by contrast, holds an 81st percentile rank against all GPUs and an average benchmark score of 37648.

Because the LX ULTRA has no recorded benchmarks, the head-to-head comparison is structurally incomplete. The RTX 4070 sits between several rivals in the database. It is 0.1% ahead of the NVIDIA Tesla P4 (which averages 37628) and 0.4% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 (which averages 37507). It trails the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile by 1.3% (which averages 38135) and leads the AMD Radeon PRO W6400 by 1.3% (which averages 37157). These deltas define the RTX 4070's competitive neighborhood, but the LX ULTRA does not appear in that neighborhood, nor does it have any nearest rivals of its own.

The data shows that the LX ULTRA's lack of benchmark entries prevents any direct win-loss tally. The winsA and winsB fields are both 0, confirming that no head-to-head tests have been recorded. This is a critical gap for a database-driven analysis, as it forces a reliance on architectural and specification comparisons rather than measured outcomes.

Where Each One Wins

Without head-to-head results, the "wins" for each product must be inferred from their respective specification sheets and the limited performance data available.

The RTX 4070's recorded benchmarks provide concrete evidence of its strengths. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3854 indicates strong DX12 rasterization performance. Its Geekbench Vulkan score of 174152 suggests robust compute and graphics API efficiency. The PassMark G3D score of 26927 and GPU Compute score of 14720 further support a profile of a capable general-purpose and gaming GPU. The RTX 4070 achieves 29.15 TFLOPS FP32 and an identical 29.15 TFLOPS FP16 (1:1 ratio), indicating balanced single-precision and half-precision throughput. Its texture rate is 455.4 GTexel/s, and its pixel rate is 158.4 GPixel/s.

The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has no measured wins because it has no measured performance. However, its specifications suggest areas where it could theoretically compete. It offers 24 GB of GDDR6 memory, double the RTX 4070's 12 GB. Its memory bandwidth is 432.0 GB/s, which is lower than the RTX 4070's 504.2 GB/s, but its memory capacity is substantially larger. The LX ULTRA has 6144 shading units versus 5888 on the RTX 4070, 192 TMUs versus 184, and 96 ROPs versus 64. Its pixel rate is 192.0 GPixel/s, higher than the RTX 4070's 158.4 GPixel/s. Its texture rate is 384.0 GTexel/s, which is lower than the RTX 4070's 455.4 GTexel/s.

The LX ULTRA's FP32 throughput is 24.58 TFLOPS, below the RTX 4070's 29.15 TFLOPS. However, its FP16 throughput is 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio), which is significantly higher than the RTX 4070's 29.15 TFLOPS FP16. This suggests the LX ULTRA could have an advantage in workloads that leverage half-precision arithmetic, such as certain AI inference or compute tasks, if its drivers and software stack support that capability.

In terms of API support, both GPUs support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The RTX 4070 supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX ULTRA supports Vulkan 1.3. This gives the RTX 4070 a potential edge in Vulkan-based applications, though the practical impact depends on software implementation.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from fundamentally different design lineages. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture, using the AD104 chip manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC. It contains 35,800 million transistors on a 294 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 121.8M per mm². The LX ULTRA uses the "TrueGPU" architecture with the 7G105 chip, fabricated on a 6 nm process, also at TSMC. Its transistor count and die size are recorded as unknown.

The RTX 4070 includes 46 RT cores and 184 tensor cores, hardware dedicated to ray tracing and AI acceleration. The LX ULTRA has no recorded RT cores or tensor cores, which means its architecture does not expose dedicated hardware for these functions in the database. This is a major architectural divergence. The RTX 4070's tensor cores enable features like DLSS and AI-based rendering, while the LX ULTRA lacks such listed hardware.

The memory subsystems differ in type and capacity. The RTX 4070 uses 12 GB of GDDR6X with a 192-bit bus, achieving 504.2 GB/s bandwidth. The LX ULTRA uses 24 GB of GDDR6 with the same 192-bit bus, achieving 432.0 GB/s. The RTX 4070's memory clock is 1313 MHz (21 Gbps effective), while the LX ULTRA's memory clock is 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). The LX ULTRA trades bandwidth for capacity.

The RTX 4070 has a base clock of 1920 MHz and a boost clock of 2475 MHz. The LX ULTRA has no recorded base or boost clocks. This prevents a direct clock-speed comparison, but the FP32 throughput figures suggest the RTX 4070 maintains a higher single-precision execution rate.

The power profiles differ as well. The RTX 4070 has a TDP of 200 W, while the LX ULTRA has a TDP of 225 W. Both use a single 16-pin power connector and require a 550 W suggested PSU. Both are dual-slot cards with PCIe 4.0 x16 interfaces.

The RTX 4070 supports 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs. The LX ULTRA supports 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs, omitting HDMI entirely. The RTX 4070 is 240 mm long, while the LX ULTRA is 268 mm long. Both are 40 mm wide, and the heights are 110 mm versus 112 mm.

FAQ

Q: Does the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA have any recorded benchmark scores?

A: No. The database shows an empty benchmark array for the LX ULTRA, with an average benchmark score of 0 and a percentile rank of 50 against all GPUs.

Q: How does the RTX 4070's average benchmark score compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The RTX 4070 averages 37648. It is 0.1% ahead of the NVIDIA Tesla P4 (37628), 0.4% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 (37507), 1.3% behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile (38135), and 1.3% ahead of the AMD Radeon PRO W6400 (37157).

Q: What is the memory capacity difference between the two GPUs?

A: The RTX 4070 has 12 GB of GDDR6X memory, while the LX ULTRA has 24 GB of GDDR6 memory. Both use a 192-bit memory bus.

Q: Which GPU has higher FP32 throughput?

A: The RTX 4070 delivers 29.15 TFLOPS FP32, while the LX ULTRA delivers 24.58 TFLOPS FP32. The RTX 4070 is higher in single-precision compute.

Q: Does the LX ULTRA have dedicated ray tracing or tensor cores?

A: The database records no RT cores or tensor cores for the LX ULTRA. The RTX 4070 has 46 RT cores and 184 tensor cores.

Q: What are the production statuses of the two GPUs?

A: The RTX 4070 is marked as end-of-life, while the LX ULTRA is marked as active. The RTX 4070 was released on 2023-04-11, and the LX ULTRA on 2026-03-16.

The Verdict

The data presents an unusual situation. The RTX 4070 is a fully characterized product with a complete set of benchmarks, a clear percentile ranking, and defined rival deltas. The LX ULTRA is a specification sheet with no measured performance. Any verdict must acknowledge this asymmetry.

For users who require proven performance, the RTX 4070 is the only option with recorded evidence. Its average benchmark score of 37648 and 81st percentile ranking demonstrate that it competes effectively with the GPUs around it. Its architecture includes RT cores and tensor cores, which are absent from the LX ULTRA's recorded specifications. Its FP32 throughput is higher, and its memory bandwidth is greater.

For users who need maximum memory capacity, the LX ULTRA offers 24 GB, double the RTX 4070's 12 GB. It also has more shading units (6144 versus 5888) and more ROPs (96 versus 64). Its FP16 throughput is 49.15 TFLOPS, which is 1.7 times the RTX 4070's FP16 figure. These are meaningful specification advantages, but they are unverified by any benchmark results.

The RTX 4070's Vulkan 1.4 support is newer than the LX ULTRA's Vulkan 1.3. The RTX 4070 also includes an HDMI 2.1 output, which the LX ULTRA lacks. The RTX 4070 is shorter (240 mm versus 268 mm) and has a lower TDP (200 W versus 225 W).

The verdict from the data is that the RTX 4070 is the safer choice for anyone relying on measured performance. The LX ULTRA remains an unknown quantity. Its specifications suggest potential strengths in memory-heavy workloads and half-precision compute, but without benchmark entries, those strengths are hypothetical. The database cannot confirm a single performance win for the LX ULTRA.

Specification Differences

| Specification | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 | Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA |

|---|---|---|

| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | TrueGPU |

| Chip | AD104 | 7G105 |

| Process Node | 5 nm | 6 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | TSMC |

| Transistors | 35,800 million | Unknown |

| Die Size | 294 mm² | Unknown |

| Transistor Density | 121.8M / mm² | Not recorded |

| Base Clock | 1920 MHz | Not recorded |

| Boost Clock | 2475 MHz | Not recorded |

| Memory Clock | 1313 MHz, 21 Gbps effective | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective |

| Memory Size | 12 GB | 24 GB |

| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |

| Memory Bus Width | 192 bit | 192 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | 504.2 GB/s | 432.0 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 5888 | 6144 |

| TMUs | 184 | 192 |

| ROPs | 64 | 96 |

| RT Cores | 46 | Not recorded |

| Tensor Cores | 184 | Not recorded |

| Pixel Rate | 158.4 GPixel/s | 192.0 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 455.4 GTexel/s | 384.0 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 29.15 TFLOPS | 24.58 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 29.15 TFLOPS (1:1) | 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| TDP | 200 W | 225 W |

| Display Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | 4x DisplayPort 1.4a |

| Vulkan Support | 1.4 | 1.3 |

| Length | 240 mm | 268 mm |

| Height | 110 mm | 112 mm |

| Width | 40 mm | 40 mm |

| Production Status | End-of-life | Active |

| Release Date | 2023-04-11 | 2026-03-16 |

| Launch MSRP | 599 USD | Not recorded |

The table highlights that the two GPUs share the same bus interface (PCIe 4.0 x16), power connector type (1x 16-pin), suggested PSU (550 W), slot width (Dual-slot), DirectX support (12 Ultimate 12_2), and OpenGL support (4.6). Their differences are substantial across compute, memory, and feature sets.