NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER vs Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 Comparison

FAQ

Q: How does the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER compare to the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 in overall benchmark positioning?

A: The RTX 4070 SUPER sits at the 83rd percentile among all GPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 43,223. The LX 7G100 has no recorded benchmark scores and sits at the 50th percentile, making direct performance comparison impossible from measured data.

Q: What are the key architectural differences between the two cards?

A: The RTX 4070 SUPER uses NVIDIA's Ada Lovelace architecture on a 5 nm TSMC process with the AD104 chip, featuring 7,168 shading units, 56 RT cores, and 224 tensor cores. The LX 7G100 uses the TrueGPU architecture on a 6 nm TSMC process with the 7G106 chip, featuring 6,144 shading units and no listed RT or tensor cores.

Q: Which card has higher memory bandwidth?

A: The RTX 4070 SUPER delivers 504.2 GB/s of bandwidth using 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 192-bit bus. The LX 7G100 provides 432.0 GB/s using 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on the same 192-bit bus width.

Q: What is the difference in raw compute performance?

A: The RTX 4070 SUPER delivers 35.48 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, while the LX 7G100 provides 24.58 TFLOPS of FP32. However, the LX 7G100 offers 49.15 TFLOPS of FP16 performance with a 2:1 ratio, compared to the RTX 4070 SUPER's 35.48 TFLOPS at a 1:1 ratio.

Q: How do the cards compare in pixel and texture processing rates?

A: The RTX 4070 SUPER achieves 198.0 GPixel/s and 554.4 GTexel/s, while the LX 7G100 reaches 192.0 GPixel/s and 384.0 GTexel/s. The RTX 4070 SUPER leads in both metrics, with a more substantial advantage in texture rate.

Q: What are the physical and power differences between the two cards?

A: The RTX 4070 SUPER is shorter at 267 mm, while the LX 7G100 is longer at 294 mm. Both are dual-slot cards. The RTX 4070 SUPER uses a 220 W TDP with a 1x 16-pin connector, while the LX 7G100 has a 225 W TDP with a 1x 8-pin connector. Both recommend a 550 W power supply.

Architecture Differences

The two cards represent fundamentally different design philosophies. The RTX 4070 SUPER uses NVIDIA's Ada Lovelace architecture, built on a 5 nm TSMC process. The LX 7G100 employs a TrueGPU architecture from Lisuan Tech, fabricated on a slightly larger 6 nm TSMC process. This process difference contributes to the RTX 4070 SUPER's higher transistor density, though the LX 7G100's transistor count and die size are not recorded in the database.

The shading unit counts differ significantly. The RTX 4070 SUPER carries 7,168 shading units, while the LX 7G100 has 6,144. This translates to a 17% advantage for the NVIDIA card in pure shading resources. The texture mapping units follow a similar pattern: 224 on the RTX 4070 SUPER versus 192 on the LX 7G100. However, the raster operations units tell a different story, with the LX 7G100 featuring 96 ROPs compared to 80 on the RTX 4070 SUPER.

The most substantial architectural divergence appears in specialized hardware. The RTX 4070 SUPER includes 56 dedicated RT cores for ray tracing and 224 tensor cores for AI acceleration. The LX 7G100 lists neither RT cores nor tensor cores in the database, suggesting a more streamlined compute-focused design without dedicated acceleration blocks.

Memory technology also differs. The RTX 4070 SUPER uses GDDR6X, while the LX 7G100 uses standard GDDR6. Both run on a 192-bit bus with 12 GB capacity, but the GDDR6X memory on the NVIDIA card operates at 21 Gbps effective, producing 504.2 GB/s bandwidth versus 432.0 GB/s on the LX 7G100's 18 Gbps effective memory.

The compute ratios reveal different design targets. The RTX 4070 SUPER provides equal FP32 and FP16 performance at 35.48 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio. The LX 7G100 offers 24.58 TFLOPS of FP32 but doubles that to 49.15 TFLOPS of FP16 at a 2:1 ratio, indicating a design optimized for workloads that can utilize mixed-precision processing.

API support is nearly identical, with both cards supporting DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The Vulkan support differs slightly: the RTX 4070 SUPER supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX 7G100 supports Vulkan 1.3. Display outputs also vary, with the RTX 4070 SUPER offering 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a, while the LX 7G100 provides 4x DisplayPort 1.4a without HDMI.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons between the RTX 4070 SUPER and the LX 7G100. The RTX 4070 SUPER has ten recorded benchmark results, while the LX 7G100 has none. This absence of measured data for the LX 7G100 means the comparison must rely on architectural specifications and the RTX 4070 SUPER's established performance profile.

The RTX 4070 SUPER's recorded benchmarks show consistent performance across multiple testing methodologies. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it scores 4,627. Geekbench results show 172,795 in OpenCL and 205,624 in Vulkan. Passmark scores range from 110 in DirectX 12 to 344 in DirectX 9, with a G3D score of 29,995 and GPU compute score of 17,108.

The nearest rivals to the RTX 4070 SUPER in the database provide context for its positioning. The NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB scores 43,262 on average, just 0.1% ahead. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile scores 43,268, also 0.1% ahead. The NVIDIA Quadro M6000 scores 43,301, 0.2% ahead. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile scores 43,667, 1% ahead. These tight margins place the RTX 4070 SUPER in a competitive mid-range position.

Since the LX 7G100 has no benchmark data, its performance relative to the RTX 4070 SUPER cannot be quantified. The architectural specifications suggest the RTX 4070 SUPER holds advantages in shading units, texture rate, FP32 compute, and memory bandwidth. The LX 7G100 counters with more ROPs, higher FP16 throughput, and a newer production status.

Specification Differences

The two cards differ across nearly every measured specification category. Starting with the core configuration, the RTX 4070 SUPER has 7,168 shading units, 224 TMUs, and 80 ROPs. The LX 7G100 has 6,144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. The RTX 4070 SUPER includes 56 RT cores and 224 tensor cores; the LX 7G100 has neither listed.

Clock speeds show distinct approaches. The RTX 4070 SUPER specifies a base clock of 1980 MHz and boost clock of 2475 MHz. The LX 7G100 lists no base or boost clocks in the database. Memory clocks differ as well: the RTX 4070 SUPER runs at 1313 MHz with 21 Gbps effective, while the LX 7G100 runs at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective.

Memory configuration matches in capacity and bus width at 12 GB and 192-bit, but diverges in type and resulting bandwidth. The RTX 4070 SUPER uses GDDR6X for 504.2 GB/s; the LX 7G100 uses GDDR6 for 432.0 GB/s. This gives the RTX 4070 SUPER a 72.2 GB/s bandwidth advantage.

Compute rates show the RTX 4070 SUPER leading in pixel fill at 198.0 GPixel/s versus 192.0 GPixel/s, and in texture fill at 554.4 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel/s. FP32 performance favors the RTX 4070 SUPER at 35.48 TFLOPS versus 24.58 TFLOPS. FP16 performance favors the LX 7G100 at 49.15 TFLOPS versus 35.48 TFLOPS.

Power and physical specifications are similar but not identical. Both cards are dual-slot with a 550 W suggested PSU. The RTX 4070 SUPER has a 220 W TDP and uses a 1x 16-pin connector; the LX 7G100 has a 225 W TDP and uses a 1x 8-pin connector. Dimensions differ: the RTX 4070 SUPER measures 267 mm by 112 mm by 42 mm, while the LX 7G100 measures 294 mm by 120 mm by 49 mm.

Production status separates the two clearly. The RTX 4070 SUPER is end-of-life, released on 2024-01-16, with a predecessor in the GeForce 30 series and successor in the GeForce 50 series. The LX 7G100 is active, released on 2026-06-17, with no predecessor or successor listed.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 4070 SUPER demonstrates strengths in several measurable categories. Its shading unit count of 7,168 exceeds the LX 7G100 by 1,024 units, providing a solid foundation for general 3D rendering. The texture rate of 554.4 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel/s gives it a 44% advantage in texture-heavy workloads. FP32 compute of 35.48 TFLOPS versus 24.58 TFLOPS positions it ahead for standard single-precision graphics processing.

Memory bandwidth is a clear win for the RTX 4070 SUPER. The 504.2 GB/s from GDDR6X memory outperforms the LX 7G100's 432.0 GB/s by 17%. This bandwidth advantage benefits high-resolution textures, large frame buffers, and memory-intensive effects. The RTX 4070 SUPER also includes dedicated RT cores and tensor cores, providing hardware acceleration for ray tracing and AI-based features that the LX 7G100 lacks entirely.

The LX 7G100 takes the lead in several specific areas. Its 96 ROPs compared to 80 on the RTX 4070 SUPER gives it a 20% advantage in raster operations, which can benefit certain pixel-heavy workloads. The FP16 throughput of 49.15 TFLOPS versus 35.48 TFLOPS provides superior mixed-precision performance, potentially useful for compute workloads that support FP16 acceleration.

The LX 7G100 also offers more display outputs with 4x DisplayPort 1.4a, compared to the RTX 4070 SUPER's single HDMI 2.1 and three DisplayPort connections. This makes the LX 7G100 more flexible for multi-display configurations without adapters. Its active production status and newer release date suggest ongoing availability and potential driver support, while the RTX 4070 SUPER is end-of-life.

Physical dimensions favor the RTX 4070 SUPER for compact builds. At 267 mm length, 112 mm height, and 42 mm width, it is smaller than the LX 7G100 at 294 mm, 120 mm, and 49 mm. The RTX 4070 SUPER's lower 220 W TDP versus 225 W also gives it a slight efficiency edge, though both require a 550 W power supply.

The Verdict

The data presents a clear split between the two cards. The RTX 4070 SUPER is a fully measured, established product with ten benchmark results and a known performance profile. Its average benchmark score of 43,223 places it at the 83rd percentile, with nearest rivals within 1% of its score. The LX 7G100 has no benchmark results and a 50th percentile rating, making its real-world performance unquantifiable from the database.

For workloads that depend on shading throughput, texture processing, FP32 compute, and memory bandwidth, the RTX 4070 SUPER holds definitive specification advantages. Its 7,168 shading units, 554.4 GTexel/s texture rate, 35.48 TFLOPS FP32, and 504.2 GB/s bandwidth provide a strong foundation for standard gaming and rendering tasks. The inclusion of RT cores and tensor cores adds capability for ray tracing and AI acceleration that the LX 7G100 cannot match.

The LX 7G100 appeals to specific use cases based on its specifications. Its 96 ROPs and 49.15 TFLOPS FP16 throughput suggest a design oriented toward compute workloads that can leverage mixed precision. The 4x DisplayPort outputs provide flexibility for professional multi-monitor setups. Its active production status and 2026 release date indicate current availability, though the absence of benchmark data means buyers must evaluate it on specifications alone.

The RTX 4070 SUPER's end-of-life status is a consideration, but its measured performance and competitive positioning among rivals within 1% of its average score confirm its capabilities. The LX 7G100's unknown transistor count, die size, and clock speeds leave significant gaps in its profile. The 6 nm process and TrueGPU architecture suggest a different design approach, but without recorded performance data, its actual capabilities remain unverified.

Users prioritizing proven performance, ray tracing, tensor core acceleration, and higher memory bandwidth should select the RTX 4070 SUPER. Users requiring maximum ROP count, FP16 compute throughput, multiple DisplayPort outputs, or current production status should consider the LX 7G100. The database records support the RTX 4070 SUPER as the safer choice for measured performance, while the LX 7G100 offers specific architectural advantages that may suit specialized workloads.