GPU Comparison

AMD
RADEON

AMD Radeon 880M

CORE STATE Strix Point
VRAM System Shared
CLOCK SPEED 2900 MHz
TDP 15 W
BUS WIDTH System Shared
ARCHITECTURE RDNA 3.5
nm
PROCESS 4 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

GeForce RTX 4060

CORE STATE AD107
VRAM 8 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2460 MHz
TDP 115 W
BUS WIDTH 128 bit
ARCHITECTURE Ada Lovelace
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2023

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
535
2,302
geekbench_opencl
31,285
95,057
geekbench_vulkan
40,006
48,643
passmark_directx_10
31
103
passmark_directx_11
73
175
passmark_directx_12
32
76
passmark_directx_9
97
236
passmark_g2d
969
1,037
passmark_g3d
7,615
19,545
passmark_gpu_compute
3,719
9,213

Analysis: AMD Radeon 880M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060

Visual performance benchmarks between Radeon RTX 4060 and AMD AMD Radeon 880M GPU indicate a decisive champion. Radeon RTX 4060 delivers notably better performance throughout recent games. The memory superiority and engineering upgrades translate into noticeably enhanced rendering performance. Benchmark numbers confirms this finding. Players demanding top-tier performance will factor this in.

The VRAM advantage of Radeon RTX 4060 becomes more critical at higher settings. Ultra HD workloads consumes notable VRAM, and Radeon RTX 4060 has greater capability. The converts into enhanced frame rates in memory-intensive workloads. Modern releases will progressively demand greater graphics memory. The benefit increases over the years.

Playing games benchmarks over different resolutions reliably benefit Radeon RTX 4060. From multiplayer games to demanding games, Radeon RTX 4060 keeps its lead. This performance reliability over multiple scenarios proves underlying design benefits. Users should rely on strong performance independent of game type. This versatility is outstanding.

AMD AMD Radeon 880M GPU shouldn't be written off entirely, however the frame rate shortfall relative to Radeon RTX 4060 is difficult to deny. For budget-conscious buyers, AMD AMD Radeon 880M GPU might yet represent an option if its reduced cost makes up for the diminished power. However, when peak gaming power, Radeon RTX 4060 represents the definite choice. This conclusion is clear. Power enthusiasts might lean toward Radeon RTX 4060.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
880M
RTX 4060
Core Specs
Shading Units
768
3,072 +300.0%
Shaders
768
3,072 +300.0%
TMUs
48
96 +100.0%
ROPs
16
48 +200.0%
Compute Units
12
SM Count
24
Clocks
Base Clock
400 MHz
1830 MHz
Boost Clock
2900 MHz
2460 MHz
Memory Clock
System Shared
2125 MHz 17 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
System Shared
8 GB
VRAM (MB)
8,192
Memory Type
System Shared
GDDR6
Memory Bus
System Shared
128 bit
Bandwidth
System Dependent
272.0 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
128 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
2 MB
24 MB
L0 Cache
32 KB per WGP
Performance
Pixel Rate
46.40 GPixel/s
118.1 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
139.2 GTexel/s
236.2 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
4.454 TFLOPS
15.11 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
278.4 GFLOPS (1:16)
236.2 GFLOPS (1:64)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
4.454 TFLOPS (1:1)
15.11 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
12
24 +100.0%
Tensor Cores
96
Power
TDP
15 W
115 W
TDP (W)
15
115 +666.7%
Suggested PSU
300 W
Power Connectors
None
1x 12-pin
Architecture
Architecture
RDNA 3.5
Ada Lovelace
GPU Name
Strix Point
AD107
Generation
Navi III IGP (Strix Point Mobile)
GeForce 40
Process Size
4 nm
5 nm
Transistors
34,000 million
18,900 million
Die Size
233 mm²
159 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
TSMC
Density
145.9M / mm²
118.9M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
2.1
3.0
CUDA
8.9
Shader Model
6.8
6.8
Physical
Slot Width
IGP
Dual-slot
Length
240 mm 9.4 inches
Height
111 mm 4.4 inches
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 1.4a
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
PCIe 4.0 x8
Other
Launch Price
299 USD
Production
Active
End-of-life
Predecessor
Navi II IGP
GeForce 30
Successor
GeForce 50
View Radeon 880M Details View GeForce RTX 4060 Details