NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Max-Q vs Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows no direct benchmark scores for either the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Max-Q or the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA. Both entries carry an average benchmark score of zero and a percentile ranking of 50 against all GPUs in the database. This absence of measured results makes a numeric head-to-head comparison impossible from the current dataset. What the database does provide is a full specification profile for each product, which allows for theoretical performance estimation based on hardware parameters.

The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA holds a massive theoretical advantage in raw compute throughput. Its FP32 rating of 24.58 TFLOPS stands against the RTX 4060 Max-Q's 9.032 TFLOPS. That represents a 2.72x difference in single-precision floating-point performance. In FP16 workloads, the gap widens further because the LX ULTRA uses a 2:1 ratio, delivering 49.15 TFLOPS, while the RTX 4060 Max-Q delivers only 9.032 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio. The LX ULTRA's FP16 capability is 5.44x higher than the RTX 4060 Max-Q's.

Pixel throughput follows a similar pattern. The LX ULTRA achieves 192.0 GPixel/s versus 70.56 GPixel/s for the RTX 4060 Max-Q, a 2.72x lead. Texture fill rate shows the same multiplier: 384.0 GTexel/s for the LX ULTRA against 141.1 GTexel/s for the RTX 4060 Max-Q. These ratios align perfectly with the shading unit counts, 6144 versus 3072, and TMU counts, 192 versus 96. The LX ULTRA doubles the RTX 4060 Max-Q in both shading units and texture mapping units, while also doubling the ROP count at 96 versus 48.

Memory bandwidth favors the LX ULTRA by a substantial margin. The LX ULTRA's 432.0 GB/s bandwidth compares to 256.0 GB/s for the RTX 4060 Max-Q, a 1.69x advantage. This comes from a wider 192-bit bus and faster 18 Gbps effective memory speed, versus the RTX 4060 Max-Q's 128-bit bus and 16 Gbps effective speed. The LX ULTRA also carries 24 GB of GDDR6 memory, three times the 8 GB on the RTX 4060 Max-Q.

The RTX 4060 Max-Q does hold specific advantages in the feature set. It includes 24 ray tracing cores and 96 tensor cores, while the LX ULTRA lists no ray tracing cores and no tensor cores in the database. The RTX 4060 Max-Q supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX ULTRA supports Vulkan 1.3. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6.

The power envelope tells a different story. The RTX 4060 Max-Q draws 35 W with no power connectors, designed as an integrated graphics processor. The LX ULTRA draws 225 W and requires a single 16-pin power connector, with a suggested power supply of 550 W. The LX ULTRA is a dual-slot card measuring 268 mm in length, 112 mm in height, and 40 mm in width. The RTX 4060 Max-Q has no listed dimensions, reflecting its IGP form factor.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher FP32 compute performance?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA delivers 24.58 TFLOPS in FP32, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Max-Q delivers 9.032 TFLOPS. The LX ULTRA is 2.72x faster in single-precision compute.

Q: How much memory does each GPU carry, and what is the bandwidth?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has 24 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Max-Q has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Does the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA support ray tracing?

A: The database lists no ray tracing cores for the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Max-Q includes 24 ray tracing cores.

Q: What is the power consumption difference between the two?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Max-Q has a TDP of 35 W and uses no power connectors. The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has a TDP of 225 W, requires one 16-pin power connector, and lists a suggested power supply of 550 W.

Q: Which GPU is more recent in the database?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has a release date of 2026-03-16, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Max-Q has a release date of 2023-01-02.

Q: What are the form factor differences?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Max-Q is an IGP with no slot width dimensions listed. The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA is a dual-slot card measuring 268 mm in length, 112 mm in height, and 40 mm in width.

Where Each One Wins

The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA dominates in every measured throughput category. Its FP32 and FP16 compute figures, pixel rate, texture rate, memory capacity, and memory bandwidth all exceed the RTX 4060 Max-Q by wide margins. For workloads that stress raw computational throughput, such as rendering, simulation, or large-scale data processing, the LX ULTRA's 6144 shading units and 192 TMUs provide a clear theoretical edge. The 24 GB memory capacity allows for datasets three times larger than the RTX 4060 Max-Q's 8 GB, which matters for applications holding large textures or models in VRAM.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Max-Q wins in portability and feature completeness. Its 35 W TDP fits within a power envelope that the LX ULTRA cannot approach, since the LX ULTRA draws 225 W and requires a 550 W power supply. The RTX 4060 Max-Q integrates ray tracing cores and tensor cores, features absent from the LX ULTRA's specification. The newer Vulkan 1.4 support also gives the RTX 4060 Max-Q a software compatibility edge. For systems needing a compact IGP solution with modern graphics features, the RTX 4060 Max-Q holds the advantage.

The data also shows different bus interfaces. The RTX 4060 Max-Q uses PCIe 4.0 x8, while the LX ULTRA uses PCIe 4.0 x16. The LX ULTRA's full x16 bandwidth reduces potential bottlenecks for data transfer between GPU and CPU, though the RTX 4060 Max-Q's lower bandwidth requirement aligns with its smaller memory and compute resources.

Specification Differences

Memory capacity differs by 16 GB. The LX ULTRA carries 24 GB, the RTX 4060 Max-Q carries 8 GB. Memory bus width differs by 64 bits: 192-bit for the LX ULTRA, 128-bit for the RTX 4060 Max-Q. Memory bandwidth differs by 176.0 GB/s: 432.0 GB/s versus 256.0 GB/s. Effective memory speed differs by 2 Gbps: 18 Gbps for the LX ULTRA, 16 Gbps for the RTX 4060 Max-Q.

Shading units differ by 3072: 6144 versus 3072. TMUs differ by 96: 192 versus 96. ROPs differ by 48: 96 versus 48. FP32 compute differs by 15.548 TFLOPS. FP16 compute differs by 40.118 TFLOPS, with the LX ULTRA using a 2:1 ratio and the RTX 4060 Max-Q using a 1:1 ratio. Pixel rate differs by 121.44 GPixel/s. Texture rate differs by 242.9 GTexel/s.

Power consumption differs by 190 W: 225 W versus 35 W. The LX ULTRA requires a 16-pin power connector and lists a 550 W suggested power supply; the RTX 4060 Max-Q has no power connectors. Slot width differs between dual-slot and IGP. The LX ULTRA has physical dimensions of 268 mm by 112 mm by 40 mm; the RTX 4060 Max-Q has no listed dimensions. Bus interface differs between PCIe 4.0 x16 and PCIe 4.0 x8.

Display outputs differ: the LX ULTRA provides 4x DisplayPort 1.4a, while the RTX 4060 Max-Q lists "Portable Device Dependent" outputs. Vulkan support differs between 1.3 and 1.4. The LX ULTRA has no ray tracing cores or tensor cores; the RTX 4060 Max-Q has 24 ray tracing cores and 96 tensor cores.

Architecture Differences

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Max-Q uses the AD107 chip based on the Ada Lovelace architecture, built on a 5 nm process at TSMC. The database records 18,900 million transistors on a 159 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 118.9 million per square millimeter. It belongs to the GeForce 40 Mobile generation and lists GeForce 30 Mobile as its predecessor and GeForce 50 Mobile as its successor.

The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA uses the 7G105 chip based on the TrueGPU architecture, built on a 6 nm process at TSMC. Transistor count, die size, and transistor density are listed as unknown. It belongs to the 7G100 generation with no predecessor or successor recorded.

The process node difference is 1 nm, with the RTX 4060 Max-Q on the smaller 5 nm node. Both use TSMC as foundry. The RTX 4060 Max-Q's Ada Lovelace architecture incorporates ray tracing and tensor cores, while the LX ULTRA's TrueGPU architecture omits both from its listed specifications. The FP16 ratio differs: Ada Lovelace uses 1:1, TrueGPU uses 2:1, indicating a different approach to mixed-precision compute.

The RTX 4060 Max-Q's transistor count of 18,900 million provides a reference point for density, while the LX ULTRA's transistor count remains undisclosed. The 6 nm process for the LX ULTRA suggests a less dense implementation than the RTX 4060 Max-Q's 5 nm node, though without die size data, direct comparison is limited.

The Verdict

The data points to two entirely different product categories. The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA is a high-power, dual-slot desktop card with massive compute resources: 24.58 TFLOPS FP32, 24 GB memory, 432.0 GB/s bandwidth, and a 225 W TDP. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Max-Q is a low-power mobile IGP with 9.032 TFLOPS FP32, 8 GB memory, 256.0 GB/s bandwidth, and a 35 W TDP. The LX ULTRA outperforms the RTX 4060 Max-Q by 2.72x in FP32, FP16, pixel rate, and texture rate, and by 1.69x in memory bandwidth.

For users prioritizing maximum compute throughput, memory capacity, and bandwidth, the LX ULTRA is the evident choice. Its 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs provide a theoretical ceiling far above the RTX 4060 Max-Q. The 24 GB memory capacity suits workloads with large data sets. The dual-slot form factor and 16-pin power connector indicate a system designed for stationary, high-performance use.

For users prioritizing power efficiency, portability, and modern graphics features, the RTX 4060 Max-Q is the appropriate selection. Its 35 W TDP, IGP form factor, and no power connector requirement fit thin-and-light systems. The inclusion of 24 ray tracing cores and 96 tensor cores provides hardware acceleration for ray-traced rendering and AI workloads, features the LX ULTRA lacks. Vulkan 1.4 support also gives the RTX 4060 Max-Q a more current API profile.

The percentile ranking of 50 for both GPUs against all entries in the database indicates that neither sits at the extreme high or low end of the overall distribution, though this ranking does not account for the significant specification gaps between the two. Benchmark results in the database remain empty for both products, so the theoretical advantages derived from specifications cannot be validated with measured scores. The release dates differ by roughly three years, with the LX ULTRA listed as newer, yet no architectural lineage connects the two products. The choice rests on whether the workload demands raw throughput and capacity or efficiency and feature breadth.