GPU Comparison

NVIDIA
GEFORCE

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

CORE STATE AD107
VRAM 6 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1755 MHz
TDP 50 W
BUS WIDTH 96 bit
ARCHITECTURE Ada Lovelace
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2023
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

RTX A4500

CORE STATE GA102
VRAM 20 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1650 MHz
TDP 200 W
BUS WIDTH 320 bit
ARCHITECTURE Ampere
nm
PROCESS 8 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2021

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

geekbench_opencl
74,748
141,837
geekbench_vulkan
75,235
129,980
passmark_directx_10
79
N/A
passmark_directx_11
130
N/A
passmark_directx_12
61
N/A
passmark_directx_9
184
N/A
passmark_g2d
633
N/A
passmark_g3d
14,423
N/A
passmark_gpu_compute
5,947
N/A
3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
N/A
3,196

Analysis: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile vs NVIDIA RTX A4500

Rendering performance tests between the NVIDIA RTX A4500 and RTX 4050 by NVIDIA indicate a definite winner. the NVIDIA RTX A4500 delivers substantially stronger benchmark scores in modern gaming benchmarks. The VRAM superiority and design enhancements translate into clearly enhanced rendering quality. Performance data validates this conclusion. Enthusiasts seeking maximum frame rates would pay attention.

RTX 4050 by NVIDIA encounters issues to match the NVIDIA RTX A4500's absolute throughput. In price-conscious builders, RTX 4050 by NVIDIA could yet provide sufficient performance, though users wanting the best performance would look toward the NVIDIA RTX A4500. The frame rate delta is significantly notable to ignore. Heavy titles notably highlight this gap. This investment delivers benefits in visual quality.

For real-time ray tracing, the NVIDIA RTX A4500 moves significantly ahead of RTX 4050 by NVIDIA. The dedicated hardware manage heavy shadow rendering far more smoothly. Enthusiasts looking for next-gen fidelity should seriously consider the NVIDIA RTX A4500. This hardware RT performance is considerable. Modern releases increasingly utilize ray tracing capabilities.

For users weighing a buying decision, the NVIDIA RTX A4500 appears as the advised pick. Its steady frame rate superiority over RTX 4050 by NVIDIA renders it the wiser purchase for enthusiast users. Factor in your personal workloads, however this evidence leads toward the NVIDIA RTX A4500. Reach an smart choice. This performance difference is measurable and notable.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
RTX 4050 Mobile
RTX A4500
Core Specs
Shading Units
2,560
7,168 +180.0%
Shaders
2,560
7,168 +180.0%
TMUs
80
224 +180.0%
ROPs
48
96 +100.0%
SM Count
20
56 +180.0%
Clocks
Base Clock
1455 MHz
1050 MHz
Boost Clock
1755 MHz
1650 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz 16 Gbps effective
2000 MHz 16 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
6 GB
20 GB
VRAM (MB)
6,144
20,480 +233.3%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory Bus
96 bit
320 bit
Bandwidth
192.0 GB/s
640.0 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
128 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
12 MB
6 MB
Performance
Pixel Rate
84.24 GPixel/s
158.4 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
140.4 GTexel/s
369.6 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
8.986 TFLOPS
23.65 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
140.4 GFLOPS (1:64)
369.6 GFLOPS (1:64)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
8.986 TFLOPS (1:1)
23.65 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
20
56 +180.0%
Tensor Cores
80
224 +180.0%
Power
TDP
50 W
200 W
TDP (W)
50
200 +300.0%
Suggested PSU
550 W
Power Connectors
None
1x 8-pin
Architecture
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
Ampere
GPU Name
AD107
GA102
Generation
GeForce 40 Mobile
Workstation Ampere (Ax000)
Process Size
5 nm
8 nm
Transistors
18,900 million
28,300 million
Die Size
159 mm²
628 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
Samsung
Density
118.9M / mm²
45.1M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
3.0
3.0
CUDA
8.9
8.6
Shader Model
6.8
6.8
Physical
Slot Width
IGP
Dual-slot
Length
267 mm 10.5 inches
Height
112 mm 4.4 inches
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
PCIe 4.0 x16
Other
Production
Active
End-of-life
Predecessor
GeForce 30 Mobile
Quadro Turing
Successor
GeForce 50 Mobile
Workstation Ada
View GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile Details View RTX A4500 Details