GPU Comparison

NVIDIA
GEFORCE

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

CORE STATE AD107
VRAM 6 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1755 MHz
TDP 50 W
BUS WIDTH 96 bit
ARCHITECTURE Ada Lovelace
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2023
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

RTX A2000 Mobile

CORE STATE GA107
VRAM 4 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1687 MHz
TDP 95 W
BUS WIDTH 128 bit
ARCHITECTURE Ampere
nm
PROCESS 8 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2021

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

geekbench_opencl
74,748
56,518
geekbench_vulkan
75,235
53,146
passmark_directx_10
79
57
passmark_directx_11
130
68
passmark_directx_12
61
47
passmark_directx_9
184
115
passmark_g2d
633
491
passmark_g3d
14,423
9,611
passmark_gpu_compute
5,947
4,334

Analysis: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile

Throughout this graphics card matchup, RTX 4050 by NVIDIA shows its leadership obviously. Whether you're streaming at 4K, RTX 4050 by NVIDIA reliably surpasses NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile from NVIDIA by notable gaps. The frame rate margin widens notably greater at higher quality levels. The card handles heavy workloads with ease. The design improvements are clear.

Gaming results throughout various titles steadily benefit RTX 4050 by NVIDIA. Whether it's fast-paced scenarios to AAA releases, RTX 4050 by NVIDIA maintains its lead. This benchmark consistency throughout various games shows fundamental engineering advantages. Users can count on capable results no matter of title. The adaptability is impressive.

Gaming benchmarks over different titles repeatedly favor RTX 4050 by NVIDIA. Whether it's competitive scenarios to heavy releases, RTX 4050 by NVIDIA preserves its superiority. The performance reliability in various scenarios demonstrates underlying design benefits. Enthusiasts will count on strong experiences independent of title. This capability is impressive.

When those making a buying decision, RTX 4050 by NVIDIA emerges as the suggested selection. Its dependable benchmark superiority over NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile from NVIDIA establishes it the wiser selection for performance-oriented buyers. Evaluate your particular needs, but the results directs toward RTX 4050 by NVIDIA. Base an wise choice. The benchmark gap is significant and substantial.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
RTX 4050 Mobile
RTX A2000 Mobile
Core Specs
Shading Units
2,560
2,560 0.0%
Shaders
2,560
2,560 0.0%
TMUs
80
80 0.0%
ROPs
48
48 0.0%
SM Count
20
20 0.0%
Clocks
Base Clock
1455 MHz
1215 MHz
Boost Clock
1755 MHz
1687 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz 16 Gbps effective
1500 MHz 12 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
6 GB
4 GB
VRAM (MB)
6,144
4,096 -33.3%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory Bus
96 bit
128 bit
Bandwidth
192.0 GB/s
192.0 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
128 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
12 MB
2 MB
Performance
Pixel Rate
84.24 GPixel/s
80.98 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
140.4 GTexel/s
135.0 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
8.986 TFLOPS
8.637 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
140.4 GFLOPS (1:64)
135.0 GFLOPS (1:64)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
8.986 TFLOPS (1:1)
8.637 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
20
20 0.0%
Tensor Cores
80
80 0.0%
Power
TDP
50 W
95 W
TDP (W)
50
95 +90.0%
Power Connectors
None
None
Architecture
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
Ampere
GPU Name
AD107
GA107
Generation
GeForce 40 Mobile
Ampere-MW (Ax000)
Process Size
5 nm
8 nm
Transistors
18,900 million
8,700 million
Die Size
159 mm²
200 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
Samsung
Density
118.9M / mm²
43.5M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
3.0
3.0
CUDA
8.9
8.6
Shader Model
6.8
6.8
Physical
Slot Width
IGP
IGP
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
Portable Device Dependent
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
PCIe 4.0 x16
Other
Production
Active
End-of-life
Predecessor
GeForce 30 Mobile
Quadro Turing-M
Successor
GeForce 50 Mobile
Ada-MW
View GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile Details View RTX A2000 Mobile Details