NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 vs Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010
Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 vs Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 and Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA represent two dramatically different interpretations of a graphics card. The RTX 4010 is a compact, low-power Ampere part from the GeForce 40-series, while the LX ULTRA is a large, high-throughput device from the 7G100 generation. The recorded data shows the two cards have no direct head-to-head benchmark results, and the LX ULTRA has no recorded benchmark scores in the database. The analysis below relies on the specification fields, the single 3DMark result for the RTX 4010, and the nearest-rival comparisons for that card.
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark results between the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 and the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA. The LX ULTRA has an average benchmark score of 0, and no benchmark entries are recorded for it. The RTX 4010 has a single recorded benchmark result: 2893 points in the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test.
For the RTX 4010, the nearest rivals in the database provide context for this score. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB scores 2907, which is 0.5% higher. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF scores 2910, 0.6% higher. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB scores 2913, 0.7% higher. The NVIDIA Quadro P600 scores 2923, 1% higher. The RTX 4010 sits just below all four of these cards, with a percentile rank of 18 among all GPUs. The performance gap is small, ranging from 0.5% to 1.0%, indicating the RTX 4010 is positioned very close to these rivals in this specific workload.
The LX ULTRA, lacking any recorded benchmark scores, cannot be compared numerically to the RTX 4010 or any other card in the database. Its percentile rank of 50 places it in the middle of the distribution of all GPUs, but this percentile is not tied to an actual measured score. The specification data for the LX ULTRA suggests a much higher theoretical throughput, with an FP32 rating of 24.58 TFLOPS and a pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s, compared to the RTX 4010's 2.706 TFLOPS and 28.19 GPixel/s. However, without a recorded benchmark score, these figures cannot be translated into a measured performance delta.
FAQ
Q: What is the RTX 4010's single recorded benchmark score?
A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 scores 2893 points in the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test. This places it at the 18th percentile among all GPUs in the database.
Q: How does the RTX 4010 compare to its nearest rivals in the database?
A: The RTX 4010 trails the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB by 0.5%, the NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF by 0.6%, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB by 0.7%, and the NVIDIA Quadro P600 by 1.0%. All four rivals have average scores within 1% of the RTX 4010.
Q: Does the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA have any benchmark results?
A: No. The LX ULTRA has an average benchmark score of 0 and no benchmark entries are recorded in the database.
Q: What is the memory capacity of each card?
A: The RTX 4010 has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, while the LX ULTRA has 24 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus.
Q: What is the power requirement difference between the two cards?
A: The RTX 4010 has a TDP of 50 W and requires no power connectors, with a suggested PSU of 250 W. The LX ULTRA has a TDP of 225 W, uses one 16-pin connector, and requires a suggested PSU of 550 W.
Q: What are the API support differences?
A: Both cards support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The RTX 4010 supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX ULTRA supports Vulkan 1.3.
Where Each One Wins
The RTX 4010 wins in efficiency and physical footprint. Its 50 W TDP requires no power connectors and a 250 W suggested PSU, making it suitable for systems with minimal power delivery. Its single-slot design, 163 mm length, and 69 mm height allow installation in compact chassis. The RTX 4010 also has a recorded benchmark score, so its measured performance is known: 2893 points in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, placing it within 1% of several higher-tier cards.
The LX ULTRA wins on raw specification headroom. Its 24 TB memory capacity, 432.0 GB/s bandwidth, and 192-bit bus width dwarf the RTX 4010's 4 GB, 96.00 GB/s, and 64-bit bus. The shading unit count of 6144 versus 768, the texture rate of 384.0 GTexel/s versus 42.29 GTexel/s, and the FP32 throughput of 24.58 TFLOPS versus 2.706 TFLOPS all point to substantially higher compute potential. The LX ULTRA also supports FP16 at a 2:1 ratio (49.15 TFLOPS), while the RTX 4010 operates at a 1:1 ratio (2.706 TFLOPS).
The RTX 4010 uses PCIe 4.0 x8, which halves the lane count compared to the LX ULTRA's PCIe 4.0 x16. The RTX 4010 has 6 RT cores and 24 tensor cores, while the LX ULTRA lists no RT core or tensor core counts. The RTX 4010's display outputs are 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a, while the LX ULTRA uses 4x DisplayPort 1.4a.
Specification Differences
The two cards differ across nearly every measurable specification. The RTX 4010 uses an 8 nm Samsung process with 8,700 million transistors on a 200 mm² die. The LX ULTRA uses a 6 nm TSMC process, with transistor count and die size listed as unknown. The RTX 4010 has a base clock of 1417 MHz and a boost clock of 1762 MHz; the LX ULTRA lists no base or boost clock. Memory clocks differ: 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) for the RTX 4010 versus 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) for the LX ULTRA.
Memory configuration is starkly different: 4 GB versus 24 GB, 64-bit versus 192-bit bus, and 96.00 GB/s versus 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. The RTX 4010 has 768 shading units, 24 TMUs, and 16 ROPs. The LX ULTRA has 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. Pixel rate is 28.19 GPixel/s versus 192.0 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 42.29 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel/s.
The RTX 4010 is single-slot with no power connectors, while the LX ULTRA is dual-slot with one 16-pin connector. The RTX 4010 is 163 mm long, 69 mm tall; the LX ULTRA is 268 mm long, 112 mm tall, and 40 mm wide. The RTX 4010 uses PCIe 4.0 x8, the LX ULTRA uses PCIe 4.0 x16. The RTX 4010 was released on 2024-04-15, while the LX ULTRA has a release date of 2026-03-16.
Architecture Differences
The architecture names and origins are unrelated. The RTX 4010 is built on NVIDIA's Ampere architecture, using the GA107 chip, and belongs to the GeForce 40 generation. The LX ULTRA is built on a "TrueGPU" architecture, using the 7G105 chip, and belongs to the 7G100 generation. The RTX 4010's predecessor is the GeForce 30 series and its successor is the GeForce 50 series; the LX ULTRA has no listed predecessor or successor.
The manufacturing process differs: Samsung 8 nm for the RTX 4010, TSMC 6 nm for the LX ULTRA. The RTX 4010 has a known transistor density of 43.5M per mm², while the LX ULTRA's density is not recorded. The RTX 4010 includes 6 RT cores and 24 tensor cores, features that are absent from the LX ULTRA's record. The FP16 execution ratio differs: 1:1 for the RTX 4010, 2:1 for the LX ULTRA. Vulkan support also differs, with the RTX 4010 at version 1.4 and the LX ULTRA at version 1.3.
Slot width and power delivery reflect the architectural priorities: the RTX 4010 is a single-slot, 50 W card with no power connector; the LX ULTRA is a dual-slot, 225 W card with a 16-pin connector. The RTX 4010's bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8, while the LX ULTRA uses PCIe 4.0 x16. The RTX 4010 uses four mini-DisplayPort 1.4a outputs, while the LX ULTRA uses four full-size DisplayPort 1.4a outputs.
The Verdict
The data supports a clear split by use case. The RTX 4010 is the only card with a measured benchmark score, and that score places it within 1% of the RTX 4060 Ti variants and the Quadro P600. Its 50 W TDP, single-slot footprint, and lack of power connectors make it suitable for low-power or space-constrained systems. The 4 GB memory and 64-bit bus limit its capacity for large datasets, but the recorded score confirms it performs at a known level in DX12 workloads.
The LX ULTRA presents a specification sheet that outclasses the RTX 4010 in nearly every compute and memory metric. The 24 GB memory, 432.0 GB/s bandwidth, 6144 shading units, and 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 throughput indicate a design aimed at memory-intensive or high-throughput tasks. The absence of any recorded benchmark score, however, means the database cannot confirm how these specifications translate into measured performance. The percentile rank of 50 is recorded without a corresponding average score, leaving the LX ULTRA's real-world results unverified.
For a user requiring a known, measured performance level in a compact, low-power package, the RTX 4010 is the only option with validated data. For a user prioritizing memory capacity, raw compute throughput, and bandwidth on paper, the LX ULTRA offers far higher specification ceilings. The RTX 4010's nearest rivals all score within 1% of it, indicating its performance tier is well-established. The LX ULTRA's specifications suggest a different class of hardware, but without benchmark data, the database cannot confirm its operational performance.