NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 vs Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 Comparison

FAQ

Q: How does the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 compare to the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 in raw compute performance?

A: The LX 7G100 delivers 24.58 TFLOPS FP32, which is roughly 9 times the RTX 4010’s 2.706 TFLOPS. The Lisuan card also provides 49.15 TFLOPS FP16 at a 2:1 ratio, while the RTX 4010 offers 2.706 TFLOPS FP16 at a 1:1 ratio.

Q: What are the memory specifications of each card?

A: The RTX 4010 has 4 GB GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus with 96.00 GB/s bandwidth and 1500 MHz memory clock (12 Gbps effective). The LX 7G100 has 12 GB GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth and 2250 MHz memory clock (18 Gbps effective).

Q: Which card has more shading units and texture mapping units?

A: The LX 7G100 has 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. The RTX 4010 has 768 shading units, 24 TMUs, and 16 ROPs. The Lisuan card has 8 times the shading units and TMUs, and 6 times the ROPs.

Q: What are the power requirements differences?

A: The RTX 4010 has a 50 W TDP, no power connectors, and a suggested PSU of 250 W. The LX 7G100 has a 225 W TDP, requires one 8-pin power connector, and suggests a 550 W PSU.

Q: How do the physical dimensions and slot requirements differ?

A: The RTX 4010 is a single-slot card measuring 163 mm in length and 69 mm in height. The LX 7G100 is a dual-slot card measuring 294 mm in length, 120 mm in height, and 49 mm in width.

Q: What API support does each card provide?

A: Both cards support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The RTX 4010 supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX 7G100 supports Vulkan 1.3.

Architecture Differences

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 and Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 represent fundamentally different design approaches. The RTX 4010 uses the GA107 chip built on Samsung’s 8 nm process, with 8,700 million transistors packed into a 200 mm² die. This yields a transistor density of 43.5 million per square millimeter. The LX 7G100 uses the 7G106 chip fabricated on TSMC’s 6 nm process. Its transistor count and die size are listed as unknown in the database, but the architectural differences are substantial.

The RTX 4010 belongs to the GeForce 40 generation and uses the Ampere architecture. It includes 6 RT cores and 24 tensor cores, providing hardware acceleration for ray tracing and AI workloads. The LX 7G100 uses an architecture labeled TrueGPU, and its RT core and tensor core counts are not recorded. This suggests the Lisuan card may not include dedicated ray tracing or tensor hardware, or the data is simply unavailable.

The shading unit counts reveal a massive disparity. The RTX 4010 has 768 shading units, while the LX 7G100 has 6144, an 8-fold difference. TMU counts follow the same ratio: 24 versus 192. The ROP count differs by a factor of 6: 16 versus 96. These differences directly impact pixel and texture throughput rates. The RTX 4010 achieves 28.19 GPixel/s pixel rate and 42.29 GTexel/s texture rate. The LX 7G100 achieves 192.0 GPixel/s and 384.0 GTexel/s respectively.

Memory architecture also diverges sharply. The RTX 4010 uses a 64-bit bus with 4 GB GDDR6, while the LX 7G100 uses a 192-bit bus with 12 GB GDDR6. The bandwidth gap is substantial: 96.00 GB/s versus 432.0 GB/s, a 4.5 times difference. The Lisuan card’s memory clock runs at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective), compared to the RTX 4010’s 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective).

The process node difference matters for power efficiency. The RTX 4010’s 8 nm Samsung process supports a 50 W TDP with no external power connectors. The LX 7G100’s 6 nm TSMC process, despite being more advanced, requires 225 W TDP and a single 8-pin connector. The suggested PSU ratings reflect this: 250 W for the RTX 4010 versus 550 W for the LX 7G100.

Physical design differs as well. The RTX 4010 is a single-slot card with 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a outputs. The LX 7G100 is a dual-slot card with 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs. The Lisuan card is substantially longer at 294 mm versus 163 mm, and taller at 120 mm versus 69 mm. The LX 7G100 also has a recorded width of 49 mm, while the RTX 4010’s width is not recorded.

Bus interface differences exist too. The RTX 4010 uses PCIe 4.0 x8, while the LX 7G100 uses PCIe 4.0 x16. This gives the Lisuan card double the bandwidth to the host system. Both cards are listed as Active in production status. The RTX 4010 released on April 15, 2024, while the LX 7G100 released on June 17, 2026.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains a single benchmark entry for the RTX 4010: a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test score of 2893. The LX 7G100 has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, so direct head-to-head comparisons rely on the nearest rival data for the RTX 4010 and the architectural specifications of both cards.

The RTX 4010’s score of 2893 places it at the 18th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are tightly clustered: the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB scores 2907, representing a delta of -0.5% relative to the RTX 4010. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF scores 2910, a -0.6% delta. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB scores 2913, a -0.7% delta. The NVIDIA Quadro P600 scores 2923, a -1% delta. These results indicate the RTX 4010 performs essentially on par with these cards in the Steel Nomad test, sitting within one percentage point of each.

The LX 7G100 has a 50th percentile ranking among all GPUs, but its average benchmark score is recorded as 0 due to missing benchmark data. This makes direct numerical comparison impossible from the recorded measurements alone. However, the specification differences provide a basis for expected performance. The LX 7G100’s FP32 throughput of 24.58 TFLOPS is approximately 9.1 times the RTX 4010’s 2.706 TFLOPS. Its pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s is roughly 6.8 times higher. Texture rate of 384.0 GTexel/s is about 9.1 times higher.

Memory bandwidth is another clear differentiator. The LX 7G100’s 432.0 GB/s is 4.5 times the RTX 4010’s 96.00 GB/s. In memory-intensive workloads, such as large textures or high-resolution rendering, this bandwidth advantage directly translates to higher throughput. The 12 GB frame buffer versus 4 GB also allows the LX 7G100 to handle larger working sets without spilling to system memory.

The RTX 4010’s advantage lies in efficiency and form factor. Its 50 W TDP is only 22% of the LX 7G100’s 225 W TDP. The single-slot, 163 mm design fits in far more compact chassis. The RTX 4010 also carries dedicated RT cores and tensor cores, which the LX 7G100 does not list. For workloads that leverage these accelerators, the RTX 4010 may hold a functional edge despite lower raw compute.

Since the head-to-head benchmark table is empty in the database, the comparison rests on the recorded Steel Nomad score for the RTX 4010 and the missing benchmark field for the LX 7G100. The percentile data shows the RTX 4010 at 18th percentile versus the LX 7G100 at 50th percentile. This percentile gap suggests the Lisuan card sits in a higher performance tier overall, even without a concrete score.

Specification Differences

The two cards differ across nearly every recorded specification. The process node differs: 8 nm for the RTX 4010 versus 6 nm for the LX 7G100. The foundries differ: Samsung for NVIDIA versus TSMC for Lisuan. Transistor count is 8,700 million for the RTX 4010, while the LX 7G100’s is unknown. Die size is 200 mm² for the RTX 4010, unknown for the LX 7G100. Transistor density is 43.5M per mm² for the RTX 4010, not recorded for the Lisuan card.

Clock speeds differ mainly on the memory side. The RTX 4010 has base and boost clocks of 1417 MHz and 1762 MHz respectively, while the LX 7G100 has no recorded base or boost clocks. Memory clocks are 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) for the RTX 4010 versus 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) for the LX 7G100.

Memory specifications diverge completely: 4 GB versus 12 GB capacity, 64-bit versus 192-bit bus width, 96.00 GB/s versus 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. Both use GDDR6 type memory. Shading units, TMUs, and ROPs all favor the LX 7G100 by wide margins: 768 versus 6144, 24 versus 192, and 16 versus 96 respectively.

The RTX 4010 has 6 RT cores and 24 tensor cores, while the LX 7G100 has no recorded values for either. Pixel rate is 28.19 GPixel/s versus 192.0 GPixel/s. Texture rate is 42.29 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel/s. FP32 compute is 2.706 TFLOPS versus 24.58 TFLOPS. FP16 compute is 2.706 TFLOPS (1:1) versus 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1).

Power and physical specifications differ: 50 W versus 225 W TDP, single-slot versus dual-slot, no power connectors versus one 8-pin, 250 W versus 550 W suggested PSU. Bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8 versus PCIe 4.0 x16. Display outputs are 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a versus 4x DisplayPort 1.4a.

Dimensions differ: 163 mm length versus 294 mm, 69 mm height versus 120 mm. The LX 7G100 has a recorded width of 49 mm, while the RTX 4010’s width is not recorded. API support matches on DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6, but differs on Vulkan: 1.4 for the RTX 4010 versus 1.3 for the LX 7G100.

Release dates differ: April 15, 2024 for the RTX 4010 versus June 17, 2026 for the LX 7G100. The RTX 4010 has a predecessor in GeForce 30 and a successor in GeForce 50, while the LX 7G100 has no recorded predecessor or successor. The RTX 4010 belongs to the GeForce 40-series and GeForce 40 generation, while the LX 7G100 has no series and belongs to the 7G100 generation.

Where Each One Wins

The LX 7G100 wins in scenarios demanding raw compute throughput. Its 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 and 49.15 TFLOPS FP16 dwarf the RTX 4010’s 2.706 TFLOPS in both precisions. Rendering tasks that scale with shading units, such as complex pixel shaders or compute-heavy post-processing, will favor the Lisuan card. The 6144 shading units versus 768 provide an 8-fold parallel processing capacity.

Memory-intensive workloads strongly favor the LX 7G100. The 432.0 GB/s bandwidth versus 96.00 GB/s allows much faster data movement. The 12 GB capacity versus 4 GB supports larger textures, bigger scene geometry, and higher resolution assets. The 192-bit bus versus 64-bit reduces memory contention in multi-tasking or large dataset scenarios.

The LX 7G100 also wins on pixel and texture throughput. Its 192.0 GPixel/s fill rate versus 28.19 GPixel/s supports higher resolution rendering with more overdraw. The 384.0 GTexel/s texture rate versus 42.29 GTexel/s enables more detailed texture filtering. These advantages matter in high-resolution gaming or professional visualization.

The RTX 4010 wins on power efficiency and physical footprint. Its 50 W TDP versus 225 W means far lower heat generation and power draw. The single-slot design and 163 mm length fit in small form factor systems. The lack of power connectors simplifies installation in constrained builds. The 250 W suggested PSU versus 550 W makes it viable in systems with modest power supplies.

The RTX 4010 also holds an edge in dedicated accelerators. Its 6 RT cores and 24 tensor cores provide hardware support for ray tracing and AI workloads. The LX 7G100 has no recorded values for these units. Applications that use ray tracing or tensor operations may run more efficiently on the NVIDIA card despite its lower raw compute. The RTX 4010’s Vulkan 1.4 support versus 1.3 on the Lisuan card also offers a newer API version.

The percentile ranking favors the LX 7G100 overall. At the 50th percentile among all GPUs versus 18th percentile for the RTX 4010, the Lisuan card sits in a higher performance tier. The RTX 4010’s nearest rivals are all within one percentage point of its Steel Nomad score, indicating it performs in a specific mid-range cluster. The LX 7G100’s missing benchmark data leaves its exact position unmeasured, but its architectural specifications suggest a much higher performance ceiling.

For compact systems, low-power builds, or workloads using ray tracing and tensor cores, the RTX 4010 delivers adequate performance in a minimal package. For compute-heavy rendering, large memory footprints, or high-resolution workloads, the LX 7G100’s substantial advantages in shading units, memory bandwidth, and fill rates make it the stronger choice. The database records zero wins for either card in the head-to-head table, leaving the comparison to specification analysis and the single benchmark score available.