NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER Comparison

# NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 occupy vastly different segments of the GPU spectrum, separated by architecture, process node, and memory configuration. In the single available benchmark — 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 — the RTX 5080 SUPER scores 3075 against the RTX 4010's 2893, a 6.3% advantage. Both cards sit at nearly identical percentile rankings among all GPUs (19th for the 5080 SUPER, 18th for the 4010), yet this surface-level similarity masks enormous internal differences. The RTX 5080 SUPER is a 415 W dual-slot flagship-class board built on TSMC's 5 nm process with 45,600 million transistors, while the RTX 4010 is a 50 W single-slot card on Samsung's 8 nm node with just 8,700 million transistors. The benchmark data shows the 5080 SUPER winning the head-to-head, but the real story is in how each card achieves its score through fundamentally different design philosophies.

The Verdict

Based strictly on the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 results, the RTX 5080 SUPER is the faster card, delivering 3075 points compared to the RTX 4010's 2893 points, a 6.3% lead. This margin is modest relative to the colossal specification gap between the two — the 5080 SUPER packs 14 times the shading units (10752 vs 768), 14 times the texture mapping units (336 vs 24), and 7 times the ROPs (112 vs 16). The RTX 5080 SUPER's advantage becomes more pronounced when examining its nearest rival list: it trails the NVIDIA Quadro P1000 by only 2.8% (3163 vs 3075) and sits 3.1% ahead of the GeForce 820A (2983 vs 3075). In contrast, the RTX 4010's nearest rivals are much closer, with the RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB just 0.5% ahead (2907 vs 2893) and the RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB 0.7% ahead (2913 vs 2893).

The RTX 5080 SUPER is the choice for users who need maximum compute throughput, massive memory capacity, and modern connectivity. Its 24 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus delivers 1.02 TB/s bandwidth, compared to the RTX 4010's 4 GB GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus at 96.00 GB/s — a 10.6-fold bandwidth advantage. The 5080 SUPER also offers PCIe 5.0 x16 versus the 4010's PCIe 4.0 x8, and triple DisplayPort 2.1b outputs versus quad mini-DisplayPort 1.4a. Conversely, the RTX 4010's 50 W TDP with no power connectors and a 250 W suggested PSU makes it suitable for low-power or embedded deployments where the 5080 SUPER's 415 W requirement and 1x 16-pin connector would be prohibitive. The 4010's single-slot 163 mm length also fits compact chassis that cannot accommodate the 5080 SUPER's 304 mm dual-slot frame.

For pure benchmark performance per watt, the data is stark: the RTX 4010 produces 2893 points at 50 W (57.9 points per watt), while the RTX 5080 SUPER produces 3075 points at 415 W (7.4 points per watt). The 4010 is nearly 8 times more power-efficient in this single test. However, the 5080 SUPER's raw capability — 56.28 TFLOPS FP32 versus 2.706 TFLOPS — makes it the only viable option for compute-heavy workloads, despite its enormous power draw. The verdict depends entirely on whether the user prioritizes absolute performance or efficiency and physical footprint.

FAQ

Q: Which card has a higher 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER scores 3075, which is 6.3% higher than the RTX 4010's 2893 in the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 benchmark.

Q: How do these cards compare to their nearest rivals?

A: The RTX 5080 SUPER trails the Intel Arc Pro B60 by 3.4% (3182 vs 3075) and the Quadro P1000 by 2.8% (3163 vs 3075), while leading the GeForce 820A by 3.1% (2983 vs 3075). The RTX 4010 is nearly tied with the RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB (0.5% behind at 2907 vs 2893) and the RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB (0.7% behind at 2913 vs 2893).

Q: What is the memory capacity difference between the two cards?

A: The RTX 5080 SUPER has 24 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus, yielding 1.02 TB/s bandwidth. The RTX 4010 has 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, yielding 96.00 GB/s bandwidth — a 6-fold capacity difference and a 10.6-fold bandwidth difference.

Q: Which card requires less power and physical space?

A: The RTX 4010 has a 50 W TDP, is single-slot, measures 163 mm in length, and requires no power connectors or additional PSU beyond a 250 W suggested unit. The RTX 5080 SUPER has a 415 W TDP, is dual-slot, measures 304 mm, and requires a 1x 16-pin power connector.

Q: Are both cards based on the same architecture?

A: No. The RTX 5080 SUPER uses the Blackwell 2.0 architecture on TSMC's 5 nm process with the GB203 chip. The RTX 4010 uses the Ampere architecture on Samsung's 8 nm process with the GA107 chip.

Q: What are the rendering core counts for each GPU?

A: The RTX 5080 SUPER has 10752 shading units, 336 TMUs, 112 ROPs, 84 RT cores, and 336 tensor cores. The RTX 4010 has 768 shading units, 24 TMUs, 16 ROPs, 6 RT cores, and 24 tensor cores.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs represent two distinct generations of NVIDIA design. The RTX 5080 SUPER is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture, fabricated by TSMC on a 5 nm process node. It uses the GB203 chip with 45,600 million transistors packed into a 378 mm² die, achieving a transistor density of 120.6 million per square millimeter. The RTX 4010 is based on the older Ampere architecture, manufactured by Samsung on an 8 nm process. Its GA107 chip contains 8,700 million transistors on a 200 mm² die, for a density of 43.5 million per square millimeter — less than half the 5080 SUPER's density.

The Blackwell architecture in the 5080 SUPER introduces a significantly more complex compute layout. Its 10752 shading units are organized across 336 TMUs and 112 ROPs, with 84 dedicated RT cores and 336 tensor cores. The Ampere-based 4010, by contrast, has 768 shading units, 24 TMUs, 16 ROPs, 6 RT cores, and 24 tensor cores. The RT core count difference is particularly notable — 84 versus 6 — indicating a 14-fold difference in ray tracing hardware. Both cards support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, so API-level feature parity exists despite the architectural gulf.

The memory subsystem reflects the generational leap. The 5080 SUPER uses GDDR7 — the latest memory standard — while the 4010 uses GDDR6. The 5080 SUPER's 256-bit memory bus is four times wider than the 4010's 64-bit bus, and its effective memory clock of 2000 MHz (32 Gbps) more than doubles the 4010's 1500 MHz (12 Gbps). This results in a bandwidth gap from 96.00 GB/s to 1.02 TB/s. The 5080 SUPER's base clock of 2295 MHz and boost clock of 2617 MHz are substantially higher than the 4010's 1417 MHz base and 1762 MHz boost, reflecting both the newer process node and higher power envelope.

Specification Differences

The most striking specification difference is in power consumption: the RTX 5080 SUPER draws 415 W versus the RTX 4010's 50 W, an 8.3-fold difference. This is reflected in their physical designs — the 5080 SUPER is dual-slot measuring 304 mm × 137 mm × 40 mm, while the 4010 is single-slot at 163 mm × 69 mm with no listed width. The 5080 SUPER requires a 1x 16-pin power connector; the 4010 has no power connectors and a suggested PSU of 250 W.

Memory configuration differs dramatically: 24 GB GDDR7 with 1.02 TB/s bandwidth on the 5080 SUPER versus 4 GB GDDR6 with 96.00 GB/s on the 4010. The 5080 SUPER's FP32 compute throughput is 56.28 TFLOPS, compared to the 4010's 2.706 TFLOPS — a 20.8-fold difference. Pixel rate is 293.1 GPixel/s versus 28.19 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 879.3 GTexel/s versus 42.29 GTexel/s. The 5080 SUPER uses PCIe 5.0 x16 while the 4010 uses PCIe 4.0 x8. Display outputs also differ: the 5080 SUPER offers 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b, while the 4010 offers 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a. The 5080 SUPER has a launch MSRP of 999 USD; the 4010 has no listed MSRP. Release dates differ by roughly 20 months, with the 5080 SUPER launching on 2025-12-31 and the 4010 on 2024-04-15. The 4010 lists its predecessor as GeForce 30 and successor as GeForce 50, confirming its position as a transitional low-power part.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The only head-to-head benchmark available is 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, where the RTX 5080 SUPER scores 3075 against the RTX 4010's 2893, yielding a 6.3% delta in favor of the 5080 SUPER. This is a surprisingly narrow margin given the 14-fold difference in shading units and 20.8-fold difference in FP32 throughput. The explanation lies in the benchmark's nature: Steel Nomad is a rasterization test that may be memory-bandwidth or latency-bound rather than compute-bound, allowing the 4010's architecture to compete more closely than raw specs suggest.

Examining the rival context clarifies the result. The RTX 5080 SUPER's 3075 score places it 2.8% behind the Quadro P1000 (3163) and 3.4% behind the Intel Arc Pro B60 (3182), while leading the GeForce 820A by 3.1% (2983 vs 3075) and the GTX 860M by 3.6% (2967 vs 3075). The RTX 4010's 2893 score sits within 1% of the RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB (2907, 0.5% behind), RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF (2910, 0.6% behind), and RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB (2913, 0.7% behind), while trailing the Quadro P600 by 1% (2923 vs 2893). This suggests the 4010 is performance-adjacent to mid-range Blackwell products despite its Ampere architecture, while the 5080 SUPER occupies a similar benchmark tier to professional and entry-level workstation cards.

The deltaPct values reveal that the 5080 SUPER's nearest rivals are within ±3.6% of its score, while the 4010's rivals are within ±1%. The 5080 SUPER's broader spread indicates it is less tightly clustered with its competitors, whereas the 4010 sits in a dense pack of similarly-scoring GPUs. The win tally shows the 5080 SUPER winning 1 benchmark and the 4010 winning 0, reinforcing the 5080 SUPER's superiority in this test. However, the 6.3% margin is smaller than the specification differences would predict, suggesting that the Steel Nomad workload does not fully exercise the 5080 SUPER's massive compute advantage. For users evaluating these cards, the benchmark data alone shows a clear but modest winner; the specification sheet tells the rest of the story about which card belongs in which system.