GPU Comparison

AMD
RADEON

AMD Radeon 880M

CORE STATE Strix Point
VRAM System Shared
CLOCK SPEED 2900 MHz
TDP 15 W
BUS WIDTH System Shared
ARCHITECTURE RDNA 3.5
nm
PROCESS 4 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

GeForce RTX 3070

CORE STATE GA104
VRAM 8 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1725 MHz
TDP 220 W
BUS WIDTH 256 bit
ARCHITECTURE Ampere
nm
PROCESS 8 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2020

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
535
3,162
geekbench_opencl
31,285
112,821
geekbench_vulkan
40,006
21,022
passmark_directx_10
31
150
passmark_directx_11
73
182
passmark_directx_12
32
85
passmark_directx_9
97
247
passmark_g2d
969
1,001
passmark_g3d
7,615
22,214
passmark_gpu_compute
3,719
11,195

Analysis: AMD Radeon 880M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070

If analyzing Radeon RTX 3070 with the AMD AMD Radeon 880M, a benchmark gap turns immediately apparent. Radeon RTX 3070 holds the lead in essentially most benchmark we executed. This gap is significant enough to change practical graphics experiences. Players should notice enhanced frame rates. This verdict is clear.

the AMD AMD Radeon 880M has difficulty to keep up with Radeon RTX 3070's pure capability. For budget consumers, the AMD AMD Radeon 880M could nonetheless deliver acceptable performance, yet buyers wanting top-tier experience might look toward Radeon RTX 3070. The benchmark difference is sufficiently substantial to ignore. Resource-hungry workloads specifically reveal this difference. This premium provides benefits in capability.

This graphics memory benefit of Radeon RTX 3070 turns more significant at elevated detail settings. High resolution gaming requires considerable graphics memory, and Radeon RTX 3070 has more headroom. This leads into smoother gameplay in heavy scenarios. Upcoming releases should increasingly require additional graphics memory. This benefit widens over generations.

The bottom line: Radeon RTX 3070 takes this battle obviously. Users seeking graphics power should certainly select Radeon RTX 3070 over the AMD AMD Radeon 880M. The benchmark data demonstrates this assessment. The scenarios can execute noticeably better. This is a straightforward victor in this tier.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
880M
RTX 3070
Core Specs
Shading Units
768
5,888 +666.7%
Shaders
768
5,888 +666.7%
TMUs
48
184 +283.3%
ROPs
16
96 +500.0%
Compute Units
12
SM Count
46
Clocks
Base Clock
400 MHz
1500 MHz
Boost Clock
2900 MHz
1725 MHz
Memory Clock
System Shared
1750 MHz 14 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
System Shared
8 GB
VRAM (MB)
8,192
Memory Type
System Shared
GDDR6
Memory Bus
System Shared
256 bit
Bandwidth
System Dependent
448.0 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
128 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
2 MB
4 MB
L0 Cache
32 KB per WGP
Performance
Pixel Rate
46.40 GPixel/s
165.6 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
139.2 GTexel/s
317.4 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
4.454 TFLOPS
20.31 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
278.4 GFLOPS (1:16)
317.4 GFLOPS (1:64)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
4.454 TFLOPS (1:1)
20.31 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
12
46 +283.3%
Tensor Cores
184
Power
TDP
15 W
220 W
TDP (W)
15
220 +1366.7%
Suggested PSU
550 W
Power Connectors
None
1x 12-pin
Architecture
Architecture
RDNA 3.5
Ampere
GPU Name
Strix Point
GA104
Generation
Navi III IGP (Strix Point Mobile)
GeForce 30
Process Size
4 nm
8 nm
Transistors
34,000 million
17,400 million
Die Size
233 mm²
392 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
Samsung
Density
145.9M / mm²
44.4M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
2.1
3.0
CUDA
8.6
Shader Model
6.8
6.8
Physical
Slot Width
IGP
Dual-slot
Length
242 mm 9.5 inches
Height
112 mm 4.4 inches
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 1.4a
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
PCIe 4.0 x16
Other
Launch Price
499 USD
Production
Active
End-of-life
Predecessor
Navi II IGP
GeForce 20
Successor
GeForce 40
View Radeon 880M Details View GeForce RTX 3070 Details