NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile vs Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA Comparison

Where Each One Wins

The recorded data presents an unusual comparison, as the two products occupy entirely different segments of the GPU landscape. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile has a complete set of benchmark results, while the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, giving it an average benchmark score of 0. Consequently, the database records zero wins for either product in direct head-to-head testing, as no shared benchmark entries exist between the two.

The RTX 3050 A Mobile shows its strengths through eight recorded benchmark entries. Its Passmark G3D score of 11664 places it in the 44th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 8746. The nearest rivals in the database show how tightly grouped this performance level is: the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2 scores 8743, a 0 percent delta, while the AMD Radeon R9 M265X scores 8851, representing a delta of -1.2 percent relative to the RTX 3050 A Mobile. The AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100 sits at 8863, a -1.3 percent delta, and the NVIDIA Quadro P2200 scores 8686, a 0.7 percent delta. This clustering indicates the RTX 3050 A Mobile delivers performance roughly equivalent to those established desktop and mobile parts.

The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has a percentile rank of 50, which suggests it sits at the median of all GPUs in the database, but without any benchmark scores, this ranking cannot be substantiated with measured data. The product is listed as active in production status, whereas the RTX 3050 A Mobile is end-of-life. For the LX ULTRA, the absence of recorded measurements means no wins can be attributed to it in any workload category, whether rasterization, compute, or memory-bound tasks.

The practical interpretation of the data is straightforward: the RTX 3050 A Mobile is the only one of the two with verifiable performance metrics. The LX ULTRA's specifications indicate high theoretical capability, but the database contains no empirical results to confirm how that hardware translates into real-world scores. Until benchmark data is recorded for the LX ULTRA, the RTX 3050 A Mobile remains the only product in this comparison with demonstrated wins across the tested workloads.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs diverge fundamentally at the architectural level. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile uses the GA106 chip built on the Ampere architecture, manufactured by Samsung on an 8 nm process node. It integrates 12,000 million transistors on a die size of 276 mm², resulting in a transistor density of 43.5 million transistors per square millimeter. The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA employs the 7G105 chip under the TrueGPU architecture, fabricated by TSMC on a 6 nm process. Its transistor count, die size, and transistor density are all listed as unknown in the database.

The RTX 3050 A Mobile belongs to the GeForce 30 Mobile generation, with its predecessor being the GeForce 20 Mobile series. The LX ULTRA is part of the 7G100 generation, with no predecessor or successor recorded. The process node difference, 8 nm versus 6 nm, gives the LX ULTRA a manufacturing advantage in terms of feature size, though the database does not provide transistor counts to assess how that translates into density or efficiency.

Clock specifications further separate the two. The RTX 3050 A Mobile has a base clock of 1065 MHz and a boost clock of 1343 MHz, with memory clocked at 1500 MHz, or 12 Gbps effective. The LX ULTRA lists no base or boost clock, but its memory runs at 2250 MHz, or 18 Gbps effective. The absence of core clock data for the LX ULTRA makes direct clock-to-clock comparisons impossible, though the memory clock advantage is clear.

The memory subsystems differ substantially. The RTX 3050 A Mobile contains 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, yielding 192.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The LX ULTRA carries 24 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, producing 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. That represents a 2.25 times increase in memory capacity and a 2.25 times increase in bandwidth, according to the recorded figures.

Compute resources show a wide gap. The RTX 3050 A Mobile has 1792 shading units, 56 texture mapping units, 32 raster output units, 14 ray tracing cores, and 56 tensor cores. The LX ULTRA has 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs, but its ray tracing core and tensor core counts are listed as null. The LX ULTRA's shading unit count is roughly 3.4 times that of the RTX 3050 A Mobile, and its texture and pixel rates reflect that scaling: 384.0 GTexel/s versus 75.21 GTexel/s, and 192.0 GPixel/s versus 42.98 GPixel/s.

Floating point performance follows the same pattern. The RTX 3050 A Mobile delivers 4.813 TFLOPS for FP32 and the same 4.813 TFLOPS for FP16, indicating a 1:1 ratio. The LX ULTRA provides 24.58 TFLOPS for FP32 and 49.15 TFLOPS for FP16, a 2:1 ratio. The FP16 advantage for the LX ULTRA suggests a different compute strategy, favoring half-precision workloads with double the throughput relative to FP32.

Power and physical characteristics also diverge. The RTX 3050 A Mobile is rated at 45 W TDP, uses an integrated form factor with no power connectors, and connects via PCIe 4.0 x8. The LX ULTRA draws 225 W, occupies a dual-slot width, requires a single 16-pin power connector, and recommends a 550 W power supply. The LX ULTRA measures 268 mm in length, 112 mm in height, and 40 mm in width, while the RTX 3050 A Mobile has no listed dimensions due to its mobile nature. Display outputs for the LX ULTRA are four DisplayPort 1.4a connections, while the RTX 3050 A Mobile's outputs are described as portable device dependent.

API support shows both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The RTX 3050 A Mobile supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX ULTRA supports Vulkan 1.3.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head benchmark table in the database is empty, meaning there are no shared test results between the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile and the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA. The RTX 3050 A Mobile has eight individual benchmark scores recorded, while the LX ULTRA has none. As a result, a direct walk through comparative wins is not possible from the recorded data.

What the data does allow is an examination of the RTX 3050 A Mobile's performance against its nearest rivals, which provides context for its capability. Its Passmark G3D score of 11664 is the highest among its recorded results. The Passmark DirectX 9 score of 152, DirectX 11 score of 94, and DirectX 10 score of 61 show a declining performance curve across older API levels, which is typical for a modern architecture that prioritizes newer feature sets. The Passmark DirectX 12 score of 55 is notably lower than the DirectX 11 result, which may indicate driver optimization patterns or workload characteristics. The Passmark G2D score of 526 reflects 2D graphics throughput, while the Passmark GPU compute score of 4419 measures general-purpose compute performance. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 52998 provides an additional cross-platform compute measurement.

Against its nearest rivals, the RTX 3050 A Mobile's average benchmark score of 8746 sits within a narrow band. The GeForce GTX 460 v2 matches it almost exactly at 8743, a 0 percent delta. The Quadro P2200 trails by 0.7 percent with a score of 8686. The Radeon R9 M265X leads by 1.2 percent at 8851, and the Radeon Pro WX 5100 leads by 1.3 percent at 8863. These deltas, all within 1.3 percent, indicate that the RTX 3050 A Mobile performs at a level statistically indistinguishable from this peer group in aggregate terms.

For the LX ULTRA, the absence of benchmark scores means the database records an average benchmark score of 0, and its nearest rivals list is empty. The percentile rank of 50 is present, but without measured results, this cannot be interpreted as a competitive position. The theoretical specifications, including 24.58 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 432.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth, suggest the LX ULTRA would outperform the RTX 3050 A Mobile by a wide margin if those specifications translate into benchmark scores, but the data does not confirm this.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile has an average benchmark score of 8746, while the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has an average benchmark score of 0 due to having no recorded benchmark results.

Q: How does the RTX 3050 A Mobile compare to its nearest rivals in the database?

A: The RTX 3050 A Mobile's average score of 8746 is effectively tied with the GeForce GTX 460 v2 at 8743 (0 percent delta), slightly ahead of the Quadro P2200 at 8686 (0.7 percent delta), and slightly behind the Radeon R9 M265X at 8851 (-1.2 percent delta) and the Radeon Pro WX 5100 at 8863 (-1.3 percent delta).

Q: What is the memory configuration difference between the two GPUs?

A: The RTX 3050 A Mobile has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with 192.0 GB/s bandwidth. The LX ULTRA has 24 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Which GPU has more shading units?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has 6144 shading units, while the RTX 3050 A Mobile has 1792 shading units. The LX ULTRA also has 192 TMUs and 96 ROPs, compared to 56 TMUs and 32 ROPs on the RTX 3050 A Mobile.

Q: What are the FP32 performance figures for each GPU?

A: The RTX 3050 A Mobile delivers 4.813 TFLOPS of FP32 performance. The LX ULTRA delivers 24.58 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, which is approximately 5.1 times higher based on the recorded values.

Q: Do both GPUs support DirectX 12 Ultimate?

A: Yes, both the RTX 3050 A Mobile and the LX ULTRA support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The RTX 3050 A Mobile supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX ULTRA supports Vulkan 1.3.

Specification Differences

The following fields differ between the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile and the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA:

• Chip: GA106 versus 7G105
• Architecture: Ampere versus TrueGPU
• Generation: GeForce 30 Mobile versus 7G100
• Process node: 8 nm (Samsung) versus 6 nm (TSMC)
• Transistors: 12,000 million versus unknown
• Die size: 276 mm² versus unknown
• Transistor density: 43.5M / mm² versus not listed
• Memory clock: 1500 MHz 12 Gbps effective versus 2250 MHz 18 Gbps effective
• Memory size: 4 GB versus 24 GB
• Memory bus width: 128 bit versus 192 bit
• Memory bandwidth: 192.0 GB/s versus 432.0 GB/s
• Shading units: 1792 versus 6144
• TMUs: 56 versus 192
• ROPs: 32 versus 96
• RT cores: 14 versus null
• Tensor cores: 56 versus null
• Pixel rate: 42.98 GPixel/s versus 192.0 GPixel/s
• Texture rate: 75.21 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel/s
• FP32 performance: 4.813 TFLOPS versus 24.58 TFLOPS
• FP16 performance: 4.813 TFLOPS (1:1) versus 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1)
• TDP: 45 W versus 225 W
• Slot width: IGP versus Dual-slot
• Power connectors: None versus 1x 16-pin
• Suggested PSU: Not listed versus 550 W
• Bus interface: PCIe 4.0 x8 versus PCIe 4.0 x16
• Display outputs: Portable Device Dependent versus 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
• Dimensions: Not listed versus 268 mm length, 112 mm height, 40 mm width
• Production status: End-of-life versus Active
• Release date: 2023-12-31 versus 2026-03-16
• Vulkan support: 1.4 versus 1.3
• Benchmark results: Eight recorded scores versus none
• Percentile rank: 44 versus 50
• Average benchmark score: 8746 versus 0
• Nearest rivals: Four listed versus none

The Verdict

The recorded data supports a clear distinction between these two products, though the comparison is limited by the lack of benchmark results for the LX ULTRA. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile is a verified performer with an average benchmark score of 8746, placing it in the 44th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals cluster within a 1.3 percent range, confirming that its performance level is consistent with established mid-range parts. For users seeking a GPU with measured, reproducible benchmark data and a track record in the database, the RTX 3050 A Mobile is the only option in this pair that provides such evidence.

The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA presents a different case. Its specifications indicate a far more powerful part on paper: 24.58 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, 6144 shading units, 24 GB of memory, and 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. These figures dwarf the RTX 3050 A Mobile's corresponding values. The LX ULTRA also carries a higher percentile rank of 50 versus 44, though this rank exists without supporting benchmark scores. Its active production status and 2026 release date suggest a newer product, while the RTX 3050 A Mobile is end-of-life with a 2023 release date.

The physical and power requirements differ sharply. The LX ULTRA demands a 225 W TDP, a 550 W suggested power supply, a dual-slot form factor, and a 16-pin power connector. The RTX 3050 A Mobile operates at 45 W with no power connectors and an integrated form factor, making it suitable for mobile or low-power implementations. The LX ULTRA's 268 mm length and dual-slot width indicate a desktop add-in card, while the RTX 3050 A Mobile is designed for portable devices.

From the data alone, the choice depends on the use case. The RTX 3050 A Mobile suits scenarios where verified performance, low power consumption, and mobile integration are priorities. The LX ULTRA suits scenarios where maximum theoretical compute throughput, large memory capacity, and high bandwidth are required, accepting the higher power draw and physical footprint. The absence of benchmark scores for the LX ULTRA means that its actual performance remains unverified in the database, so any decision favoring it must rely on specification-based projections rather than measured results. Conversely, the RTX 3050 A Mobile's performance is fully documented, with an average score that places it alongside the GeForce GTX 460 v2, Quadro P2200, Radeon R9 M265X, and Radeon Pro WX 5100 within a narrow margin of 1.3 percent.