GPU Comparison

AMD
RADEON

AMD Radeon 680M

CORE STATE Rembrandt+
VRAM System Shared
CLOCK SPEED 2200 MHz
TDP 50 W
BUS WIDTH System Shared
ARCHITECTURE RDNA 2.0
nm
PROCESS 6 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2023
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

GeForce MX570 A

CORE STATE GA107SB
VRAM 2 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1155 MHz
TDP 25 W
BUS WIDTH 64 bit
ARCHITECTURE Ampere
nm
PROCESS 8 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2021

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
378
N/A
geekbench_opencl
23,468
39,780
geekbench_vulkan
23,723
37,601

Analysis: AMD Radeon 680M vs NVIDIA GeForce MX570 A

Analyzing the test data for the NVIDIA GeForce MX570 A card from NVIDIA and AMD's AMD Radeon 680M graphics, a distinct story emerges. the NVIDIA GeForce MX570 A card from NVIDIA steadily achieves stronger frame rates in our benchmarking. This benchmark advantage spans from considerable to impressive depending on the given benchmark. This reliability attests to underlying design benefits. Buyers wanting graphics capability will take note.

For ray tracing, the NVIDIA GeForce MX570 A card from NVIDIA leaps further in front of AMD's AMD Radeon 680M graphics. The RT cores execute intensive lighting effects significantly more efficiently. Enthusiasts wanting cutting-edge graphics might seriously consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX570 A card from NVIDIA. The ray tracing capability is considerable. Contemporary releases increasingly utilize ray tracing capabilities.

Playing games results over diverse scenarios reliably advantage the NVIDIA GeForce MX570 A card from NVIDIA. From multiplayer games to AAA games, the NVIDIA GeForce MX570 A card from NVIDIA preserves its superiority. The performance steadiness in diverse scenarios shows underlying technical advantages. Players can expect capable results no matter of game type. This capability is remarkable.

AMD's AMD Radeon 680M graphics isn't ignored entirely, yet its gaming deficit against the NVIDIA GeForce MX570 A card from NVIDIA is difficult to dismiss. For price-aware users, AMD's AMD Radeon 680M graphics could still make a choice provided its reduced price accounts for its diminished performance. But, for peak visual performance, the NVIDIA GeForce MX570 A card from NVIDIA stands as the clear winner. The conclusion is obvious. Capability enthusiasts should shift toward the NVIDIA GeForce MX570 A card from NVIDIA.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
680M
MX570 A
Core Specs
Shading Units
768
2,048 +166.7%
Shaders
768
2,048 +166.7%
TMUs
48
64 +33.3%
ROPs
32
32 0.0%
Compute Units
12
SM Count
16
Clocks
Base Clock
2000 MHz
832 MHz
Boost Clock
2200 MHz
1155 MHz
Memory Clock
System Shared
1500 MHz 12 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
System Shared
2 GB
VRAM (MB)
2,048
Memory Type
System Shared
GDDR6
Memory Bus
System Shared
64 bit
Bandwidth
System Dependent
96.00 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
128 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB
L0 Cache
32 KB per WGP
Performance
Pixel Rate
70.40 GPixel/s
36.96 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
105.6 GTexel/s
73.92 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
3.379 TFLOPS
4.731 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
211.2 GFLOPS (1:16)
73.92 GFLOPS (1:64)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
6.758 TFLOPS (2:1)
4.731 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
12
16 +33.3%
Tensor Cores
64
Power
TDP
50 W
25 W
TDP (W)
50
25 -50.0%
Power Connectors
None
None
Architecture
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
Ampere
GPU Name
Rembrandt+
GA107SB
Generation
Navi II IGP (Rembrandt Mobile)
GeForce MX (5xx)
Process Size
6 nm
8 nm
Transistors
13,100 million
8,700 million
Die Size
208 mm²
200 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
Samsung
Density
63.0M / mm²
43.5M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
2.0
3.0
CUDA
8.6
Shader Model
6.8
6.8
Physical
Slot Width
IGP
IGP
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
Portable Device Dependent
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
PCIe 4.0 x8
Other
Production
Active
End-of-life
Predecessor
Vega II IGP
Successor
Navi III IGP
View Radeon 680M Details View GeForce MX570 A Details