NVIDIA GB10 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 AD106 Comparison
NVIDIA GB10
GeForce RTX 4060 AD106
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: NVIDIA GB10 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 AD106
Where Each One Wins
The recorded data presents an unusual comparison because the two GPUs occupy entirely different segments and have different measurement profiles. The NVIDIA GB10 is a server-oriented Blackwell part with a 95th percentile ranking across all GPUs, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 AD106 sits at the 50th percentile. The GB10 carries two benchmark entries in the database: a Geekbench OpenCL score of 120,137 and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 114,648. The RTX 4060 AD106 has no recorded benchmark scores, meaning the comparison must be drawn from architectural specifications and the GB10's position relative to its nearest rivals.
The GB10 wins outright in compute capability. Its FP32 throughput of 29.71 TFLOPS is nearly double the RTX 4060's 15.11 TFLOPS. Texture processing shows an even larger gap: the GB10 delivers 928.5 GTexel/s against the RTX 4060's 236.2 GTexel/s, a 3.9x advantage. Pixel rates are close, with the GB10 at 116.1 GPixel/s and the RTX 4060 at 118.1 GPixel/s, a marginal win for the consumer card. Memory capacity strongly favors the GB10 at 128 GB of LPDDR5X versus 8 GB of GDDR6 on the RTX 4060. Memory bandwidth is nearly identical, 273.2 GB/s for the GB10 and 272.0 GB/s for the RTX 4060, a difference of less than half a percent.
The RTX 4060 AD106 wins in areas tied to consumer graphics support. It has a full API stack with DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The GB10 lists N/A for all three APIs, indicating no consumer graphics API support in the database. The RTX 4060 also has multiple display outputs (1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a) versus a single HDMI output on the GB10. The RTX 4060's higher base clock of 1830 MHz versus 1665 MHz and boost clock of 2460 MHz versus 2418 MHz suggest better clock scaling per core, though the GB10 compensates with double the shading units.
Architecture Differences
The two chips come from different architectural generations and design philosophies. The GB10 uses the Blackwell 2.0 architecture on a 20B-class chip (GB20B), fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC. The RTX 4060 uses the Ada Lovelace architecture on the AD106 chip, also 5 nm at TSMC. The GB10's die measures 382 mm², while the AD106 die measures 188 mm². The AD106 has a known transistor count of 22,900 million and a transistor density of 121.8M per mm². The GB10's transistor count is listed as unknown, but its larger die size and server positioning suggest a more complex design.
Core counts differ substantially. The GB10 has 6144 shading units, 384 texture mapping units, 48 ROPs, 48 RT cores, and 384 tensor cores. The RTX 4060 has 3072 shading units, 96 TMUs, 48 ROPs, 24 RT cores, and 96 tensor cores. The GB10 doubles the shading units, quadruples the TMUs, doubles the RT cores, and quadruples the tensor cores. The ROP count is identical at 48, which explains the near-identical pixel rates.
Memory architecture diverges as well. The GB10 uses 128 GB of LPDDR5X on a 256-bit bus with a memory clock of 1067 MHz (8.5 Gbps effective). The RTX 4060 uses 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with a memory clock of 2125 MHz (17 Gbps effective). The GB10's wider bus compensates for its lower memory clock, resulting in nearly identical bandwidth. The GB10 connects via PCIe 5.0 x16, while the RTX 4060 uses PCIe 4.0 x8.
Power and physical specifications also separate the two. The GB10 has a TDP of 140 W and is an IGP (integrated graphics processor) with no power connectors and a 300 W suggested PSU. Its dimensions are 150 mm length, 51 mm height, and 150 mm width. The RTX 4060 has a TDP of 115 W, uses a dual-slot design with a 1x 12-pin power connector, and also lists a 300 W suggested PSU. The RTX 4060 has no recorded dimensions. The GB10 is marked as Active production with a release date of 2025-10-14, while the RTX 4060 is End-of-life with a release date of 2024-03-31.
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark entries between the GB10 and the RTX 4060. The RTX 4060 has no benchmark scores recorded at all, and the average benchmark score field is 0. The GB10, by contrast, has an average benchmark score of 117,393 across its two recorded tests. This absence of comparative data means the head-to-head analysis relies on the GB10's nearest rival comparisons and the architectural specifications.
The GB10's nearest rivals in the database provide context for its performance tier. The NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation scores 117,088, which places the GB10 0.3% ahead. The AMD Radeon PRO W7700 scores 118,976, placing the GB10 1.3% behind. The NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB scores 114,395, with the GB10 2.6% ahead. The NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile scores 113,944, with the GB10 3% ahead. These deltas indicate the GB10 sits in a tight performance cluster among workstation and server GPUs, with all rivals within a 3% band.
Given that the RTX 4060 has no recorded benchmark data, the most meaningful numerical comparison comes from specification-derived metrics. The FP32 throughput difference is the clearest signal: 29.71 TFLOPS versus 15.11 TFLOPS, a 96.6% advantage for the GB10. The texture rate difference of 928.5 GTexel/s versus 236.2 GTexel/s represents a 293% advantage. The pixel rate difference is negligible, 116.1 GPixel/s versus 118.1 GPixel/s, a 1.7% edge for the RTX 4060. Memory bandwidth is effectively tied at 273.2 GB/s versus 272.0 GB/s, a 0.4% difference.
The GB10's tensor core count of 384 versus 96 on the RTX 4060 suggests a fourfold advantage in AI-related workloads, though no direct tensor benchmark scores appear in the database. The GB10's 128 GB memory capacity versus 8 GB represents a 16x difference, which would matter for large model inference or dataset residency. The RTX 4060's higher memory clock (2125 MHz versus 1067 MHz) and faster effective data rate (17 Gbps versus 8.5 Gbps) show that its GDDR6 memory operates at double the speed, but the GB10's 256-bit bus doubles the width to compensate.
The Verdict
The data indicates these are different tools for different tasks. The GB10 is a server Blackwell part with a 95th percentile ranking, Active production status, and a launch MSRP of 3,999 USD. Its 128 GB memory capacity, quadruple tensor core count, and near-double FP32 throughput position it for compute-heavy server workloads. The RTX 4060 AD106 is an end-of-life consumer GeForce part at the 50th percentile, with full DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4 API support, plus multiple display outputs. It targets consumer graphics rendering where API compatibility and display connectivity matter.
The GB10's nearest rival data reinforces its server positioning. It outperforms the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation by 0.3%, trails the Radeon PRO W7700 by 1.3%, and leads the Tesla V100 SXM2 by 2.6% and the RTX A5500 Mobile by 3%. These are all workstation, server, or professional mobile GPUs, not consumer cards. The RTX 4060's lack of benchmark scores means it cannot be placed in the same performance hierarchy.
For compute throughput, the GB10 is the clear choice based on FP32, texture rate, tensor core count, and memory capacity. For consumer graphics rendering with modern API support and multi-display output, the RTX 4060 has the features the GB10 lacks. The RTX 4060's lower TDP of 115 W versus 140 W also makes it more power-efficient in raw wattage, though the GB10's higher performance per watt is not directly calculable from the data. The RTX 4060's dual-slot design and 12-pin connector indicate a conventional add-in card, while the GB10's IGP form factor with no power connectors suggests an integrated solution within a larger system.
FAQ
Q: Which GPU has higher FP32 compute performance?
A: The NVIDIA GB10 delivers 29.71 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, which is 96.6% higher than the RTX 4060 AD106's 15.11 TFLOPS.
Q: How do the memory capacities compare?
A: The GB10 has 128 GB of LPDDR5X memory on a 256-bit bus, while the RTX 4060 has 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus. The GB10 offers 16 times the capacity.
Q: Do both GPUs support the same graphics APIs?
A: No. The RTX 4060 supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The GB10 lists N/A for DirectX, OpenGL, and Vulkan in the database.
Q: What are the nearest rivals to the GB10 based on average benchmark scores?
A: The GB10's average score of 117,393 puts it 0.3% ahead of the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation (117,088), 1.3% behind the Radeon PRO W7700 (118,976), 2.6% ahead of the Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB (114,395), and 3% ahead of the RTX A5500 Mobile (113,944).
Q: How does the memory bandwidth differ between the two?
A: The GB10 has 273.2 GB/s of bandwidth, and the RTX 4060 has 272.0 GB/s. The difference is 0.4%, making them effectively equivalent despite different memory types and bus widths.
Q: What are the power requirements for each GPU?
A: The GB10 has a 140 W TDP with no power connectors and a 300 W suggested PSU. The RTX 4060 has a 115 W TDP with a 1x 12-pin connector and a 300 W suggested PSU.