GPU Comparison

Intel
GPU

Intel Arc A370M

CORE STATE DG2-128
VRAM 4 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2050 MHz
TDP 35 W
BUS WIDTH 64 bit
ARCHITECTURE Xe-HPG
nm
PROCESS 6 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2022
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

CMP 50HX

CORE STATE TU102
VRAM 10 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1545 MHz
TDP 250 W
BUS WIDTH 320 bit
ARCHITECTURE Turing
nm
PROCESS 12 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2021

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

geekbench_opencl
29,676
56,135
geekbench_vulkan
28,673
47,445

Analysis: Intel Arc A370M vs NVIDIA CMP 50HX

If analyzing the NVIDIA CMP 50HX against GeForce Arc A370M, the benchmark gap gets obviously noticeable. the NVIDIA CMP 50HX secures the advantage in essentially all benchmark we ran. The difference is substantial sufficiently to affect practical graphics performance. Users can notice enhanced gameplay. This determination is straightforward.

This video memory superiority of the NVIDIA CMP 50HX becomes particularly important at higher settings. Ultra HD scenarios needs considerable video memory, and the NVIDIA CMP 50HX offers additional headroom. This results into smoother frame rates in heavy games. Modern releases can only demand additional video memory. The superiority increases over time.

For RT, the NVIDIA CMP 50HX jumps even more forward of GeForce Arc A370M. The hardware units process intensive global illumination computations significantly more effectively. Players demanding cutting-edge fidelity would strongly consider the NVIDIA CMP 50HX. This real-time ray tracing advantage is substantial. Modern releases increasingly use RT capabilities.

The bottom line: the NVIDIA CMP 50HX wins this battle obviously. Consumers prioritizing visual capability might certainly favor the NVIDIA CMP 50HX over GeForce Arc A370M. This score numbers demonstrates this conclusion. Your workloads might render significantly better. This is a clear victor in this segment.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
A370M
CMP 50HX
Core Specs
Shading Units
1,024
3,584 +250.0%
Shaders
1,024
3,584 +250.0%
TMUs
64
192 +200.0%
ROPs
32
80 +150.0%
SM Count
56
Execution Units
128
Clocks
Base Clock
1550 MHz
1350 MHz
Boost Clock
2050 MHz
1545 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz 14 Gbps effective
1750 MHz 14 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
4 GB
10 GB
VRAM (MB)
4,096
10,240 +150.0%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory Bus
64 bit
320 bit
Bandwidth
112.0 GB/s
560.0 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
4 MB
5 MB
Performance
Pixel Rate
65.60 GPixel/s
123.6 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
131.2 GTexel/s
296.6 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
4.198 TFLOPS
11.07 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
1,049.6 GFLOPS (1:4)
346.1 GFLOPS (1:32)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
8.397 TFLOPS (2:1)
22.15 TFLOPS (2:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
8
56 +600.0%
Tensor Cores
448
XMX Cores
128
Power
TDP
35 W
250 W
TDP (W)
35
250 +614.3%
Suggested PSU
600 W
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Architecture
Architecture
Xe-HPG
Turing
GPU Name
DG2-128
TU102
Generation
Alchemist (Arc 3 Mobile)
Mining GPUs
Process Size
6 nm
12 nm
Transistors
7,200 million
18,600 million
Die Size
157 mm²
754 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
TSMC
Density
45.9M / mm²
24.7M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
3.0
3.0
CUDA
7.5
Shader Model
6.6
6.8
Physical
Slot Width
IGP
Dual-slot
Length
267 mm 10.5 inches
Height
116 mm 4.6 inches
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
No outputs
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
PCIe 1.0 x4
Other
Production
End-of-life
End-of-life
View Arc A370M Details View CMP 50HX Details