GPU Comparison

AMD

RADEON

AMD Radeon RX 6600S

CORE STATE Navi 23

VRAM 4 GB

CLOCK SPEED 2000 MHz

TDP 80 W

BUS WIDTH 128 bit

ARCHITECTURE RDNA 2.0

PROCESS 7 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2022

NVIDIA

GEFORCE

CMP 50HX

CORE STATE TU102

VRAM 10 GB

CLOCK SPEED 1545 MHz

TDP 250 W

BUS WIDTH 320 bit

ARCHITECTURE Turing

PROCESS 12 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2021

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

geekbench_opencl

66,435

56,135

passmark_directx_10

N/A

passmark_directx_11

105

N/A

passmark_directx_12

N/A

passmark_directx_9

176

N/A

passmark_g2d

647

N/A

passmark_g3d

12,649

N/A

passmark_gpu_compute

4,879

N/A

geekbench_vulkan

N/A

47,445

Analysis: AMD Radeon RX 6600S vs NVIDIA CMP 50HX

Gaming performance comparisons between AMD RX 6600 and NVIDIA's NVIDIA CMP 50HX graphics demonstrate a clear victor. AMD RX 6600 achieves considerably superior frame rates throughout current titles. The memory superiority and technical upgrades translate into noticeably better visual quality. Score results demonstrates this assessment. Gamers wanting top-tier visuals would pay attention.

When it comes to hardware ray tracing, AMD RX 6600 jumps even more beyond of NVIDIA's NVIDIA CMP 50HX graphics. The dedicated cores process complex shadow calculations far more smoothly. Players wanting premium effects should strongly favor AMD RX 6600. The ray tracing advantage is significant. Modern releases continually utilize RT capabilities.

When users weighing a investment determination, AMD RX 6600 emerges as the preferred option. Its dependable benchmark advantage over NVIDIA's NVIDIA CMP 50HX graphics positions it the wiser purchase for gaming-focused builders. Consider your specific workloads, though this benchmarks directs toward AMD RX 6600. Make an informed decision. The benchmark gap is tangible and considerable.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION

RX 6600S

CMP 50HX

Core Specs

Shading Units

1,792

3,584 +100.0%

Shaders

1,792

3,584 +100.0%

TMUs

112

192 +71.4%

ROPs

80 +25.0%

Compute Units

—

SM Count

—

Clocks

Base Clock

1700 MHz

1350 MHz

Boost Clock

2000 MHz

1545 MHz

Game Clock

1881 MHz

—

Memory Clock

1750 MHz 14 Gbps effective

Memory

Memory Size

4 GB

10 GB

VRAM (MB)

4,096

10,240 +150.0%

Memory Type

GDDR6

Memory Bus

128 bit

320 bit

Bandwidth

224.0 GB/s

560.0 GB/s

Cache

L1 Cache

128 KB per Array

64 KB (per SM)

L2 Cache

2 MB

5 MB

L3 Cache

32 MB

—

L0 Cache

32 KB per WGP

—

Performance

Pixel Rate

128.0 GPixel/s

123.6 GPixel/s

Texture Rate

224.0 GTexel/s

296.6 GTexel/s

FP32 (TFLOPS)

7.168 TFLOPS

11.07 TFLOPS

FP64 (TFLOPS)

448.0 GFLOPS (1:16)

346.1 GFLOPS (1:32)

FP16 (TFLOPS)

14.34 TFLOPS (2:1)

22.15 TFLOPS (2:1)

AI/RT

RT Cores

56 +100.0%

Tensor Cores

—

448

Power

TDP

80 W

250 W

TDP (W)

250 +212.5%

Suggested PSU

—

600 W

Power Connectors

None

2x 8-pin

Architecture

RDNA 2.0

Turing

GPU Name

Navi 23

TU102

Generation

Navi Mobile (RX 6000M)

Mining GPUs

Process Size

7 nm

12 nm

Transistors

11,060 million

18,600 million

Die Size

237 mm²

754 mm²

Foundry

TSMC

Density

46.7M / mm²

24.7M / mm²

API Support

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

OpenGL

4.6

Vulkan

1.4

OpenCL

2.1

3.0

CUDA

—

7.5

Shader Model

6.8

Physical

Slot Width

IGP

Dual-slot

Length

—

267 mm 10.5 inches

Height

—

116 mm 4.6 inches

Outputs

Portable Device Dependent

No outputs

Bus Interface

PCIe 4.0 x8

PCIe 1.0 x4

Other

Production

End-of-life

Predecessor

Polaris Mobile

—

View Radeon RX 6600S Details View CMP 50HX Details

GPU Comparison

AMD Radeon RX 6600S

CMP 50HX

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

Analysis: AMD Radeon RX 6600S vs NVIDIA CMP 50HX

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

Related Graphics Cards

Related Comparisons